This article considers how feminist theories have and can contribute to action research, while acknowledging some of the tensions that arise when applying and building feminist theories. While feminist theorizing undoubtedly occurs in some action research, whether it is named or not, the gap appears to be in linking local knowledge to existing theoretical frameworks. Feminist theories, even though they are always partial and contested, have acted as an intentional counter to dominant theories about human experiences and strategies for change. They prompt people to ask new questions and to see power dynamics and relationships that may otherwise be missed or misread. As a result, they have an important role to play in any action research with transformative intentions.
Beilin, R., & Boxelaar, L. (2001). Rethinking action research: Theory and extension practice. In Australian Pacific Extension Network 2001 International Conference Proceedings. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved from: http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2001/r/BeilinR.htm#TopOfPage
2.
Berge, B.M., & Ve, H. (2000). Action research for gender equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3.
Brydon-Miller, M., Maguire, P., & McIntyre, A. (Eds.). (2004). Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
Butler, J. (1994). Against proper objects. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6(2), 1-16.
5.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
6.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A social science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67-86.
7.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
8.
Frisby, W., Reid, C., & Ponic, P. (2007). Levelling the playing field: Promoting the health of poor women through a community development approach to recreation. In K. Young & P. White (Eds.), Sport and gender in Canada (pp. 121- 136). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
9.
Frisby, W., Reid, C., Miller, S., & Hoeber, L. (2005). Putting `participatory' into participatory forms of action research. Journal of Sport Management, 19(4), 367-386.
10.
Guijt, I., & Shah, M. K. (Eds). (1998). The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
11.
Hackett, E., & Haslanger, S. (2006). Theorizing feminisms. New York : Oxford University Press.
12.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies , 14, 575-599.
13.
Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 49-72.
14.
Hemmings, C. (2007). What is a feminist theorist responsible for? Feminist Theory, 8(1), 69-76.
15.
Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
17.
hooks, b. (1998). Men: Comrades in struggle. In S. Schacht & D. Ewing (Eds.), Feminism and men: Reconstructing gender relations (pp. 265-279). New York: New York University Press.
18.
Lorber, J. (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics . Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing .
19.
Lykes, B., & Coquillon, E. (2006). Participatory and action research and feminisms: Towards transformative praxis. In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach . Amherst, MA: The Centre for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
21.
Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 59-69). London: SAGE.
22.
Maguire, P., & Berge, B.M. (2009). Elbows out, arms linked: Claiming spaces for feminisms and gender equity in educational action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Handbook of educational action research (pp. 311-319). London: SAGE.
23.
Maguire, P., Brydon-Miller, M., & McIntyre, A. (2004). Introduction. In M. Brydon-Miller, P. Maguire, & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research (pp. ix-xix). Westport, CT: Praeger.
24.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800.
25.
McCann, C., & Kim, S. K. (Eds.). (2003). Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives. New York: Routledge.
26.
McCready, L. (2004). Understanding the marginalization of gay and gender non-conforming black male youth. Theory into Practice, 43(2), 136-143.
27.
McEwan, C. (2001). Postcolonialism, feminism and development: Intersections and dilemmas. Progress in Development Studies, 1(2): 93-111.
28.
McIntyre, A. (1997). Making meaning of whiteness: Exploring racial identity with white teachers. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
McIntyre, A. (2000). Inner-city kids: Adolescents confront life and violence in an urban community. New York: New York University Press.
30.
McIntyre, A., & Lykes, M.B. (2004). Weaving words and pictures in/through feminist participatory action research. In M. Brydon-Miller , P. Maguire & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research (pp. 57-78). Westport, CT : Praeger.
31.
Mohanty, C.T. (1988). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61-88.
32.
Mohanty, C.T. (2004). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
Nealon, J., & Giroux, S.S. (2003). The theory toolbox: Critical concepts in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
34.
Noffke, S. (1998, July). What's a nice theory like yours doing in a practice like this? And other impertinent questions about practitioner research . Keynote address presented at the 2nd International Practitioner Research Conference. Sydney, Australia.
35.
Ong, A. (1988). Colonialism and modernity: Feminist representations of women in non-western societies. Inscriptions, 3(4), 79-104.
36.
Pheterson, G. (1990). Alliances between women: Overcoming internalized oppression and internalized domination. In L. Albrecht & R. M. Brewer (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women's multicultural alliances (pp. 34-47). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
37.
Ponic, P. (2007). Embracing complexity in community-based health promotion: Inclusion, power and women's health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of British Columbia.
38.
Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: SAGE.
39.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 93-105). London: SAGE.
40.
Reid, C. (2004a). The wounds of exclusion: Poverty, women's health, and social justice. Edmonton, AB: Qualitative Institute Press.
41.
Reid, C. (2004b). Advancing women's social justice agendas: A feminist action research framework. International Journal of Qualitative Method, 3(3), Article 1.
42.
Reid, C., & Frisby, W. (2007). Continuing the journey: Articulating dimensions of feminist participatory action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 93-105). London: SAGE.
43.
Reid, C., Frisby, W., & Ponic, P. (2002). Confronting two-tiered community recreation and poor women's exclusion: Promoting inclusion, health, and social justice. Canadian Women's Studies, 21(3), 88-94.
44.
Reid, C., Tom, A., & Frisby, W. (2006). Finding the `action' in feminist participatory action research. Action Research, 4(3), 313-330.
45.
Rooney, P. (1998). Men, work, and family: The case for a subjective approach to an objective problem. European Families and Work Network, New Ways, pp. 1-12.
46.
Schacht, S., & Ewing, D. (Eds.). (1998). Introduction. In Feminism and men: Reconstructing gender relations (pp. 1-17). New York: New York University Press. Spivak, G.C. (1990). The postcolonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues (S. Harasym, Ed.). New York: Routledge.
47.
Thompson, N. (2000). Theory and practice in human services. Buckingham: Open University Press.
48.
Wang, C., Burris, M.A., & Ping, X.Y. (1996). Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science & Medicine, 42(10), 1391-1400.
49.
Weiner, G. (2004). Critical action research and third wave feminism: A meeting of paradigms. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 631-644.
50.
Williams, J., & Lykes, B. (2003). Bridging theory and practice: Using reflexive cycles in feminist participatory action research. Feminism & Psychology, 13(3), 287- 294.
51.
Yoshihama, M., & Carr, E.S. (2002). Community participation considered: Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. Journal of Community Practice , 10(4), 85-102.
52.
Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193-210.
