‘Testing it in the real world’: Using action research to apply a conceptual framework to social care planning

Abstract

This paper outlines an action research methodology used to create a practice-informed resource for social care in Australia. Practitioners and researchers worked together to develop, test and refine a process to engage people with cognitive disability and complex support needs in person-centred planning. The planning approach, which calls for planners to reflect on their own skills and attitudes as well as the unique needs of an individual, has helped to improve practice in a number of fields and locations in Australia. The process marks a substantive practice shift towards recognition of planning as fundamentally relational in nature. This paper reflects on the process of action research which we describe as similarly relational and potentially transformative of the relations between researchers and practitioners. Working within a knowledge translation paradigm we show how reflexivity within the researcher/practitioner relationship in action research calls for a substantive shift in perspective by researchers to effectively work within the complex contexts of practitioners themselves. In taking this opportunity in our research practice, we identify the potential for a fundamentally different praxis to emerge, one more deeply grounded in the conceptual, political and practical relations between researchers, practitioners and those whose lives they seek to enhance.

Keywords

Action research praxis knowledge translation person-centred planning disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bargal

(2008). Action research: A paradigm for achieving social change. Small Group Research, 39(1), 17–27. doi: 10.1177/1046496407313407

Bigby

(2014). Is the National Disability Insurance Scheme taking account of people with intellectual disabilities? Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1, 93–97. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2014.974484

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research). (2012). Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: Integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Clift

(2014). Access to the National Disability Insurance Scheme for people with intellectual disabilities who are involved in the criminal justice system. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1, 24–33. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2014.910863

Collings

Dew

Dowse

(2016a). Support Planning for people with intellectual disability and complex support needs in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(3), 272–276. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2016.1151864

Collings

Dew

Dowse

(2016b). Being a planner with a person with disability and complex support needs: A planning resource. Sydney, Australia: UNSW. Retrieved from http://arts.unsw.edu.au/research/intellectual-disability-behaviour-support-program

Collings

Dew

Dowse

(2017). Complexity for planners engaged with persons with cognitive disability and complex support needs. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability. Epub ahead of print 3 July 2017. doi: 10.1111/jar.12381

Davies

Nutley

Walter

(2008). Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 188–190. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008055

10.

Dickinson

Needham

Sullivan

(2015). Individual funding for disability support: What are the implications for accountability? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(4), 414–725. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12106

11.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

12.

Hall

B. L.

(2005). In from the cold: Reflections on participatory action research from 1970–2005. Convergence, 38(1), 5–24.

13.

Hamilton,

. (2016). The complex support needs planning resource kit: Being a Planner with a Person with Disability and Complex Support Needs, Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 191–199. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2016.1241717

14.

Hughes

(2008). Action research in healthcare. In Reason

Bradbury

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., Chapter 25, pp. 381–293). London, UK: Sage.

15.

Kothari

Wathen

C. N.

(2013). A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy, 109(2), 187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004

16.

McCormack

Dewing

(2012). Action research: Working with transformational intent. Klinisk Sygepleje, 26(3), 4–14.

17.

O’Brien

C. L.

O’Brien

(2000). The origins of person-centred planning: A community of practice perspective. In Holburn

Vietze

P. M.

(Eds.), Person-centred planning: Research, practice, and future directions. (pp. 3–27). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.

18.

Purcal

Fisher

Meltzer

(2016). Social insurance for individualised disability support – Implementing the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). In Fenger

Hudson

Needham.

(Eds.), Social policy review 28: Analysis and debate in social policy. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

19.

Reason

Bradbury

(2008). Introduction to Groundings. In Reason

Bradbury

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–11). London, UK: Sage.

20.

Reason

Torbert

(2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science: A further look at the scientific merits of action research. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 1–37.

21.

Robertson

Hatton

Emerson

Elliott

McIntosh

Swift

, … Joyce

(2007). Reported barriers to the implementation of person-centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities in the UK. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 297–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00333.x

22.

Sanderson

(2000). Person-centred planning: Key features and approaches. Report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, UK. Retrieved from http://www.familiesleadingplanning.co.uk/documents/pcp%20key%20features%20and%20styles.pdf