Understanding how action research can be practiced, taught, and learned in contemporary universities requires understanding the dominant structures that organize higher education in the 21st century. This article presents the neo-liberal and Taylorist structures affecting higher education and then places the practice and study of action research in this context to outline ways action research could contribute to an improved future for higher education.
AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AlexanderF. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411–431.
3.
BaldwinG. (1994). The student as customer: The discourse of ‘quality’ in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 9(2), 131–139.
4.
BecherT.TrowlerP. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
BirnbaumR. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BleiklieI. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state: New Public Management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 299–316.
8.
BokD. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BousquetM. (2008). How the university works: Higher education and the low-wage nation. New York: New York University Press.
10.
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Eikeland, O. (Eds.) (2006). Ethics and action research. Special issue of Action Research, 4(1).
11.
ChandlerJ.BarryJ.ClarkH. (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55(9), 1051–1069.
12.
ColeJ. (2009). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, and why it must be protected. New York: Public Affairs.
13.
Commission on Higher Education. (2004). Great expectations: The social sciences in Britain. New York: Transaction Publishers.
14.
CorbettA. (2005). Universities and the Europe of knowledge: Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurship in European Union higher education policy, 1955–2005. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
CroissantJ.RestivoS. P. (2001). Degrees of compromise: Industrial interests and academic values. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
DeemR.HillyardS.ReedM. I. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
DouglasM. (1966). Purity and danger. London: Routledge.
18.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Oxford and New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GappaJ. M.AustinA. E.TriceA. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GibbsP. (2001). Higher education as a market: A problem or solution?Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 85–94.
GoddardJ.PuukkaJ. (2008). The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(2), 3–33.
23.
GreenwoodD. (2009a). Bologna in America: The Spellings Commission and neo-liberal higher education policy. Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1–38.
24.
GreenwoodD.(2009b). Are universities knowledge-intensive organizations? In: JemielniakD.KociatkiewiczJ. (eds). Handbook of research on knowledge-intensive organizations. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global, 1–18.
25.
GreenwoodD.LevinM.(2000). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In: DenzinN.LincolnY. (eds). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 85–106.
26.
GreenwoodD.LevinM.(2001). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In: ReasonP.BradburyH. (eds). Handbook of action research. London: SAGE, 103–113.
27.
GreenwoodD.LevinM.(2005). reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. In: DenzinN.LincolnY. (eds). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 43–64.
28.
GreenwoodD.LevinM.(2007). The future of universities: Action research and the transformation of higher education. In: ReasonP.BradburyH. (eds). Handbook of action research, 3rd edn. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 211–226.
29.
GreenwoodD.LevinM. (2008). The reformed social sciences to reform the university: Mission impossible?Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 89–112.
30.
HardingA.ScottA.LaskeS.BurtscherC. (2007). Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development, and the knowledge economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
31.
KamvouniasP. (1999). Students as customers and higher education as industry: A review of the literature and the legal academy of educational leadership journal. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 3(1), 32–40.
32.
KirnW. (2009). Lost in the meritocracy: The undereducation of an overachiever. New York: Doubleday.
33.
KirpD. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
LawrenceS.SharmaU. (2002). Commodification of education and academic LABOUR: Using the balanced scorecard in a university critical perspectives on accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5–6), 661–677.
35.
LyallK.SellK.GorenP. (2008). The true genius of America at risk: Are we losing our public universities to de facto privatization?Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 177–177.
36.
McMahonW. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Messer-DavidowE. (2002). Disciplining feminism: From social activism to academic discourse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
NeradM.EvansB. (2009). The impact of globalization on doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
39.
NeradM.HeggelundM. (2008). Towards a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
40.
NeradM.with JuneR.MillerD. (1997). Graduate education in the United States. New York: Garland Press.
41.
NewfieldC. (2003). Ivy and industry: Business and the making of the American university, 1880–1980. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
42.
NewfieldC. (2008). Unmaking the public university: The forty-year assault on the middle class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
NewmanF.CouturierL.ScurryJ. (2004). The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
NowotnyH.ScottP.GibbonsM. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
45.
OlssenM.PetersM. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge journal of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
46.
PriestD.St JohnE. P. (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47.
RaboA.WrightS. (2010). Introduction: Anthropologies of university reform. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 18(1), 1–14.
48.
ReddingP. (2005). The evolving interpretations of customers in higher education: Empowering the elusive. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 409–417.
49.
RossD. (1992). The origins of American social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
ShumarW. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
51.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
SlaughterS.RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
StrathernM. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London and New York: Routledge.
54.
TaylorF. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
55.
TuchmanG. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
WashburnJ. (2005). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of American higher education. New York: Basic Books.
57.
WrightS.Williams ØrbergJ.(2009a). Paradoxes of the self: Self-owning universities in a society of control. In: SørensenE.TriantafillouP. (eds). The politics of self-governance. London: Ashgate, 117–136.
58.
WrightS.Williams ØrbergJ.(2009b). Prometheus (on the) rebound? Freedom and the Danish steering system. In: HuismanJ. (ed.) International perspectives on the governance of higher education. London: Routledge, 69–87.
