Action research was chosen to investigate the interface between economic and environmental factors in the aviation sector. A variant of the methodology was developed which combined the ethos of action research with the prescriptive mechanism of case study analysis. This was found to be particularly appropriate for the situation encountered, where the parameters of the central problem are clearly defined and an outline solution can be identified but how to persuade stakeholders of a way forward is uncertain. The research had three phases beginning with the preparatory phase which examined the situation in depth to be able to propose a feasible solution. The second phase involved seeking ideas from another sector with similar characteristics. The third phase consisted of engagement with stakeholders across six stakeholder groups. It is suggested that the ‘action research case study’ is particularly suited to the challenge of sustainability and may have wider utility.
AltrichterH.KemmisS.McTaggartR.Zuber-SkerrittO. (2002) The concept of action research. The Learning Organisation. 9(3), 125–131; republished in Volume II of Cooke, B., & Cox, J. W. (Eds.), Fundamentals of action research (pp. 101–113). London: Sage Publications.
2.
ArgyrisC.SchönD. A. (2005) Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. American Behavioral Scientist. 32(5), 612–623; republished in Volume II of Cooke, B., & Cox, J. W. (Eds.), Fundamentals of action research (pp. 137–147). London: Sage Publications.
3.
BradburyH. (2013) Action research: The journal’s purpose, vision and mission. Action Research11(1): 3–7.
4.
BridgerR. (2013) Plane truth: Aviation’s real impact on people and the environment, London: Pluto Press.
5.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2000) Doing action research in your own organisation, London: Sage.
6.
DaleyB. (2010) Air transport and the environment, Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
7.
EkinsP.SpeckS. (1999) Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics13: 369–396.
8.
ForesterJ. (2013) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory12(1): 5–22.
9.
FrohanM. A.SashkinM.KavanaghM. J. (1976) Action-research as applied to organization development. Organization and Administration Science. 7(1 and 2), 129–161; republished in Volume II of Cooke, B., & Cox, J. W. (Eds.), Fundamentals of action research (pp. 367–405). London: Sage Publications.
10.
GustavsenB. (2008) Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory. Action Research6(4): 421–437.
11.
GösslingS.UphamP. (2009) Climate change and aviation: Issues, challenges and solutions, London: Earthscan.
12.
HallN. L.TaplinR.GoldsteinW. (2010) Empowerment of individuals and realization of community agency: Applying action research to climate change responses in Australia. Action Research8(1): 71–91.
HummelsD. (2007) Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. The Journal of Economic Perspectives21(3): 131–154.
15.
ICAO. (2010). Statement from the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to the Thirty-third Session of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA33) (30 November to 4 December 2010 – Cancun, Mexico). Retrieved from: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/STATEMENTS/sbsta-33.pdf.
16.
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2006). Convention on international civil aviation. Document 7300/9, Montréal: ICAO.
17.
LeeD. S.PitariG.GreweV.GierensK.PennerJ. E.PetzoldSausenR. (2010) Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation. Atmospheric Environment44(37): 4678–4734.
18.
MarkardJ.RavenR.TrufferB. (2012) Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, Special Section on Sustainability Transitions41(6): 955–967.
19.
McMannersP. J. (2012) Fly and be damned: What now for aviation and climate change?, London: Zed Books.
20.
McNiffJ.WhiteheadJ. (2000) Action research in organisations, London: Routledge.
21.
NijkampP. (1999) Sustainable transport: New research and policy challenge for the next millennium. European Review7: 551–563. DOI: 10.1017/S1062798700004476.
22.
O'ConnorW. E. (2001) An introduction to airline economics, (6th ed. Westport: Praeger.
23.
OrmerodR. J. (1996) Combining management consultancy and research. Omega International Journal of Management Science24(1): 1–12.
24.
PoteeteA. R.JanssenM. A.OstromE. (2010) Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
PrestonH.LeeD. S.HooperP. D. (2012) The inclusion of the aviation sector within the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme: What are the prospects for a more sustainable aviation industry?Environmental Development2: 48–56.
26.
ReasonP.Bradbury-HuangH. (2000) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, London: Sage.
27.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2012) Qualitative interview: The art of hearing data, (3rd ed. London: Sage.
28.
Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment (SSEE) (2010) Future of mobility roadmap, (2nd ed. Oxford: SSEE.
29.
StettlerM. E. J.EasthamS.BarrettS. R. H. (2011) Air quality and public health impacts of UK airports. Part I: Emissions. Atmospheric Environment45: 5415–5424.
