In recent times concerns about possible adverse effects of early separation and advocacy for individual rights have resulted in a movement away from organizational level policies about the separation of twin children as they enter school. Instead, individualized approaches that focus on the twin children’s characteristics and family perspectives have been proposed. This study, conducted in Australia where all but a few families had choice about the class placement of their twin children, questioned parents (N = 156) about their placement decisions. Results indicated that most parents opted for placement together in the early years of schooling. The choice to separate twins at school entry was associated with parent identification of risk in the twin relationship, while being kept together was associated with parent identification of absence of such risk. The findings are discussed in light of the current evidence against separation, and suggest that parent choices regarding the separation of twin children in the early years are informative to educational policy and practice.
ArcE (2008) A descriptive study of academic and practitioners perceptions identifying program practices meeting the unique needs of twins in center-based preschools. Doctor of Education in Organizational Leadership, University of La Verne.
BallaràCYBolleaE (1994) Structuring of self and twinship. Acta Geneticae, Medicae, Gemellologica: Twin Research39: 145–148.
4.
BeauchampHMBrooksLJ (2003) The perceptions, policy, and practice of educating twins: A review. Psychology in Schools40: 429–438.
5.
CoventryWLByrneBColemanMOlsonRKCorleyRWillcuttESamuelssonS (2009) Does classroom seperation affect twins’ reading ability in the early years?Twin Research and Human Genetics12(5): 455–461.
6.
DanbySThorpeK (2005) Compatibility and conflict: Negotiation of relationships by dizygotic same-sex twin girls. Twin Research and Human Genetics9: 103–112.
7.
DavidsonST (2005) The great twin debate. Psychology Today38(4): 30.
8.
DeanLL (1999) Mandatory twin separation in school: How parents can best rely on another set of ‘twins’ – Meyer and Pierce – to keep their children together. Stetson Law Review29(2): 451–494.
9.
DiLallaLFMullineauxPY (2008) The effects of classroom environment on problem behaviors: A twin study. Journal of School Psychology46(2): 107–128.
10.
GleesonCHayDAJohnstonCJTheobaldTM (1990) Twins in school: An Australia-wide program. Acta geneticae Medicae et Gemellolgiae: Twin Research39: 231–244.
11.
GrimeJJ (2008) The educational effects of forced separation of twins. Doctor of Education degree in Eductional Administration and Supervision, The University of Toledo.
12.
HayDA (2004) Together or apart. Twin Research7(2): 3–4.
13.
HayDAPreedyP (2006) Meeting the educational needs of multiple birth children. Early Human Development82: 397–403.
14.
JonesLDe GioiaK (2010) The same or separate? An exploration of teachers’ perceptions of the classroom assignment of twins in prior to school and kindergarten to Year Two school settings. Journal of Early Childhood Research8(3): 239–253.
15.
LarcheSH (2007) From the twin cities to ‘twin’ states: Legislating the classroom placement of twins and other higher order multiples. Marquette Law Review91(2): 587–604.
16.
LevyFHayDAMclaughlinMWoodCWaldmanI (1996) Twin sibling differences in parental reports of ADHD, speech, reading and behavioural problems. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines37: 569–578.
17.
LuriaARYudovichFL (1959) Speech and the Development of Mental Processes in the Child. Rochester: Staples Press.
18.
MartinB (2006) School policy to separate twins spurs changes: Parent and expert testimony supports twins’ law. Twins23(1): 26–27.
19.
MartinJAHamiltonBESuttonPDVenturaSJMenackerFKirmeyerSMathewsTJ (2009) Births: Final data for 2006. In: ReportsNVS (ed.) National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
20.
NilssonJLeonardLBarazanjiDSimoneR (2009) Placement of twins and multiples in the classroom: A brief survey of school counselors’ knowledge and attitudes. Journal of School Counseling8(16), available at: http://www.jsc.montana.edu/articles/v8n16.pdf.
21.
Office of National Statistics (2008) Review of the National Statistician on births and patterns of family building in England and Wales, 2007. ONS.
22.
PalusznyMGibsonR (1974) Twin interactions in a normal nursery school. American Journal of Psychiatry131: 293–296.
23.
Penninkilampi-KerolaVMoilanenIKaprioJ (2005) Co-twin dependence, social interactions, and academic achievement: A population-based study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships22: 519–541.
24.
PoldermanTJCBartelsMVerhulstFCHuizinkACVan BeijsterveldtCEMBoomsmaDI (2009) No effect of classroom sharing on educational achievement in twins: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health64: 36–40.
25.
PreedyP (1999) Meeting the educational needs of pre-school and primary aged twins and higher multiples. In: SandbankAC (ed.) Twin and Triplet Psychology: A Professional Guide to Working with Multiples. New York: Routledge.
26.
PreedyP (2001) Are multiple birth children different from singletons? Meeting the educational needs of multiple birth children upon school entry. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Birmingham.
27.
PulkkinenLVaalamoIHietalaRKaprioJRoseRJ (2003) Peer reports of adaptive behaviour in twins and singletons: Is twinship a risk or and advantage. Twin Research6(2): 106–118.
28.
RutterMRedshawJ (1991) Annotation: Growing up as a twin: Twin-singleton differences in psychological development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry32(6): 885–895.
29.
RutterMThorpeKJGreenwoodRNorthstoneKGoldingJ (2003) Twins as a natural experiment to study causes of language delay I: Examination of obstetric and perinatal environment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry44(3): 326–341.
30.
SarnaSKaprioJSistonenePKoskenvuoM (1987) Diagnosis of twin zygosity by mailed questionnaire. Human Heredity28: 241–254.
31.
SegalNL (1993) Twin, sibling, and adoption methods: Tests of evolutionary hypothesis. American Psychologist48(9): 943–956.
32.
SegalNLRussellJM (1992) Twins in the classroom: School policy issues and recommendations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation3(1): 69–84.
33.
SimonoffE (1992) A comparison of twins and singletons with psychiatric disorders: An item sheet study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry33: 1319–1332.
34.
TancredyCMFraleyRC (2006) The nature of adult twin relationships: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships90(1): 78–93.
35.
ThorpeKDanbyS (2006) Compromised or competent: Analysing twin children’s social worlds. Twin Research and Human Genetics9(1): 90–94.
36.
ThorpeKGreenwoodREiversARutterM (2001) Prevalence and developmental course of ‘secret language’. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders36: 43–62.
37.
ThorpeKRutterMGreenwoodR (2003) Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay: II: Family interaction risk factors. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines44(3): 342–355.
38.
TullyLAMoffittTECaspiATaylorAKiernanHAndreouP (2004) What effect does classroom separation have on twins’ behavior, progress at school, and reading abilities?Twin Research7(2): 115–124.
39.
Van LeeuwenMVan Den BergSMVan BeijsterveldtTCEMBoomsmaDI (2005) Effects of twin separation in primary school. Twin Research and Human Genetics8(4): 384–391.
40.
WallaceM (1996) The Silent Twins. London: Vintage.
41.
WebbinkDHayDAVisscherPM (2007) Does sharing the same class in school improve cognitive abilities of twins?Twin Research and Human Genetics10(4): 573–580.
