This study proposes an explanation for the accuracy of top management teams’ diagnoses of strategic issues. Key determinants are the number of members on the management team, as well as the span of managers’ attention and its allocation to the environment and to other managers. Depending on the nature of the issues faced, managers who reason analogically from past experience to draw inferences about current strategic issues may arrive at accurate or inaccurate diagnoses. We specify and analyze a multiple-agent model that encompasses individual, top management team, and context characteristics relevant to classifying strategic issues as opportunities or threats based on learning from experience. Results from our model indicate that attending to the environment improves the accuracy of strategic issue diagnoses, whereas attending to other managers’ inferences proves detrimental. Adding members can enhance issue diagnosis accuracy for a team that makes decisions according to majority-rule voting, despite leaving the accuracy of individual managers’ diagnoses unchanged.
ArendtLAPriemRLNdoforHA (2005) A CEO-adviser model of strategic decision making. Journal of Management31(5): 680–699.
4.
BaerMDirksKTNickersonJA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal34(2): 197–214.
5.
BarrPSGlynnMA (2004) Cultural variations in strategic issue interpretation: Relating cultural uncertainty avoidance to controllability in discriminating threat and opportunity. Strategic Management Journal25(1): 59–67.
6.
BouquetCMorrisonABirkinshawJ (2009) International attention and multinational enterprise performance. Journal of International Business Studies40(1): 108–131.
7.
BramsSJFishburnPC (2002) Voting procedures. In: ArrowKJSenAKSuzumuraK (eds) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 173–236.
8.
BudescuDVChenE (2015) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Science61(2): 267–280.
9.
BurtonRM (2003) Computational laboratories for organization science: Questions, validity and docking. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory9(2): 91–108.
10.
BurtonRMObelB (1995) The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory1: 57–71.
11.
BurtonRMObelB (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organization Science22: 1195–1202.
12.
CarleyKM (1992) Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organization Science3(1): 20–46.
13.
CarleyKM (1996) A comparison of artificial and human organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization31(2): 175–191.
14.
CarleyKM (2009) Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behavior of humans. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory15: 47–59.
15.
CarleyKMLinZ (1997) A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion. Management Science43(7): 976–997.
16.
CarleyKMPrietulaMJLinZ (1998) Design versus cognition: The interaction of agent cognition and organizational design on organizational performance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation1(3): 1–4.
17.
CastellanetaFZolloM (2015) The dimensions of experiential learning in the management of activity load. Organization Science26(1): 140–157.
18.
CertoSTLesterRHDaltonCM, et al. (2006) Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies43(4): 813–839.
19.
ChattopadhyayPGlickWHHuberGP (2001) Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal44(5): 937–955.
20.
ChoTSHambrickDC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science17(4): 453–469.
21.
CohenJCohenPWestSG, et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
CooperDPatelPCThatcherSMB (2014) It depends: Environmental context and the effects of faultlines on top management team performance. Organization Science25(2): 633–652.
23.
CornelissenJPClarkeJS (2010) Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review35(4): 539–557.
24.
CsaszarFAEggersJP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Science59(10): 2257–2277.
25.
DaftRLWeickKE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review9(2): 284–295.
26.
DaftRLSormunenJParksD (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal9(2): 123–139.
27.
DaneE (2011) Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management37(4): 997–1018.
28.
DuttonJE (1986) The processing of crisis and non-crisis strategic issues. Journal of Management Studies23(5): 501–517.
29.
DuttonJE (1993) The making of organizational opportunities: An interpretive pathway to organizational change. Research in Organizational Behavior15: 195–226.
30.
DuttonJEAshfordSJ (1993) Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review18(3): 397–428.
31.
DuttonJEDuncanRB (1987a) The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal8(3): 279–295.
32.
DuttonJEDuncanRB (1987b) The influence of the strategic planning process on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal8(2): 103–116.
33.
DuttonJEJacksonSE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review12(1): 76–90.
34.
DuttonJEOttensmeyerE (1987) Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions, and contexts. Academy of Management Review12(2): 355–365.
35.
DuttonJEWebsterJ (1988) Patterns of interest around issues: The role of uncertainty and feasibility. Academy of Management Journal31(3): 663–675.
36.
DuttonJEAshfordSJLawrenceKA, et al. (2002) Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science13(4): 355–369.
37.
DuttonJEAshfordSJO’NeillRM, et al. (1997) Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal18(5): 407–423.
38.
DuttonJEAshfordSJO’NeillRM, et al. (2001) Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 716–736.
DuttonJEStumpfSAWagnerD (1990) Diagnosing strategic issues and managerial investment of resources. Advances in Strategic Management6: 143–167.
41.
DuttonJEWaltonEJAbrahamsonE (1989) Important dimensions of strategic issues: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Journal of Management Studies26(4): 379–396.
42.
EdmundsAMorrisA (2000) The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management20(1): 17–28.
43.
EpplerMMengisJ (2004) The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society20(5): 325–344.
44.
FangCLeeJSchillingMA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science21(3): 625–642.
45.
FriedmanLW (1996) The Simulation Metamodel. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
46.
GavettiGRivkinJW (2005) How strategists really think: Tapping the power of analogy. Harvard Business Review83(4): 54–63.
47.
GavettiGRivkinJW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organization Science18(3): 420–439.
48.
GavettiGWarglienM (2015) A model of collective interpretation. Organization Science26(5): 1263–1283.
49.
GavettiGLevinthalDRivkinJW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management Journal26: 691–712.
50.
GentnerD (1983) Structure-mapping—A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science7(2): 155–170.
51.
GentnerDMarkmanAB (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist52(1): 45–56.
52.
GilboaISchmeidlerD (2001) A Theory of Case-Based Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
HaleblianJFinkelsteinS (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal36(4): 844–863.
54.
HambrickDC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review32(2): 334–343.
55.
HarrisonJRLinZCarrollGR, et al. (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review32: 1229–1245.
56.
HastieRKamedaT (2005) The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review112(2): 494–508.
57.
HenricksonLMcKelveyB (2002) Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America99(10): 7288–7295.
58.
HighhouseSPaesePWLeatherberryT (1996) Contrast effects on strategic-issue framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes65(2): 95–105.
59.
HolyoakKJThagardP (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science13(3): 295–355.
60.
HolyoakKJThagardP (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
IsabellaLAWaddockSA (1994) Top management team certainty: Environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management20(4): 835–858.
JacksonSEDuttonJE (1988) Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly33(3): 370–387.
64.
JanisIL (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
65.
KennyDA (1979) Correlation and Causality. New York: Wiley.
66.
KerrNLTindaleRS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology55: 623–655.
67.
KuvaasB (2002) An exploration of two competing perspectives on informational contexts in top management strategic issue interpretation. Journal of Management Studies39(7): 977–1001.
68.
LantTK (2002) Organizational cognition and interpretation. In: BaumJAC (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 344–262.
69.
LantTKShapiraZ (2001) Introduction: Foundations of research on cognition in organizations. In: LantTKShapiraZ (eds) Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–12.
70.
LarkeyLBMarkmanAB (2005) Processes of similarity judgment. Cognitive Science29(6): 1061–1076.
71.
LarrickRPMannesAESollJB (2011) The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. In: KruegerJI (ed.) Frontiers of Social Psychology: Social Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 227–242.
72.
LauzenMM (1995) Public relations manager involvement in strategic issue diagnosis. Public Relations Review21(4): 287–304.
73.
LavieN (1995) Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21(3): 451–468.
74.
LawAM (2015) Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 5th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
75.
LevinthalDA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science43: 934–950.
76.
McKelveyB (2002) Model-centered organization science epistemology. In: BaumJAC (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 752–780.
77.
MaitlisSChristiansonM (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals8(1): 57–125.
78.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
79.
MeziasJMStarbuckWH (2003) Studying the accuracy of managers’ perceptions: A research odyssey. British Journal of Management14(1): 3–17.
80.
MichelAA (2007) A distributed cognition perspective on newcomers’ change processes: The management of cognitive uncertainty in two investment banks. Administrative Science Quarterly52(4): 507–557.
81.
MillerKD (2015) Agent-based modeling and organization studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization Studies36(2): 175–196.
82.
MillerKDLinS (2015) Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments. Strategic Management Journal36(13): 2000–2020.
83.
MillikenFJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review12: 133–143.
84.
NadkarniSBarrPS (2008) Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management Journal29(13): 1395–1427.
85.
NewellASimonHA (1972) Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
86.
NigamAOcasioW (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science21(4): 823–841.
87.
OcasioW (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal18(S1): 187–206.
88.
PageSE (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89.
PerlowLAOkhuysenGARepenningNP (2002) The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal45(5): 931–955.
90.
PlambeckNWeberK (2009) CEO ambivalence and responses to strategic issues. Organization Science20(6): 993–1010.
RudolphJWMorrisonJBCarrollJS (2009) The dynamics of action-oriented problem solving: Linking interpretation and choice. Academy of Management Review34(4): 733–756.
93.
SandbergJTsoukasH (2020) Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory1(1): 1–34.
94.
SchneiderSC (1987) Information overload: Causes and consequences. Human Systems Management7(2): 143–153.
95.
SchneiderSCDe MeyerA (1991) Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management Journal12(4): 307–320.
96.
SchwabAAbrahamsonEStarbuckWH, et al. (2011) Researchers should make thoughtful assessments instead of null-hypothesis significance tests. Organization Science22(4): 1105–1120.
97.
SimonHA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics69: 99–118.
98.
SimonHA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review63: 129–138.
99.
SimonHA (1976) From substantive to procedural rationality. In: LatsisSJ (ed.) Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–148.
100.
SimonHA (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Review68(2): 1–16.
101.
SimonHA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review69: 493–513.
102.
StatlerMJacobsCDRoosJ (2008) Performing strategy—Analogical reasoning as strategic practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management24(2): 133–144.
103.
SurowieckiJ (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York: Doubleday.
104.
SutcliffeKM (1994) What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal37(5): 1360–1378.
105.
SutcliffeKMWeickKE (2008) Information overload revisited. In: HodgkinsonGPStarbuckWH (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–75.
106.
ThomasJBMcDanielRRJr (1990) Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Academy of Management Journal33(2): 286–306.
107.
ThomasJBClarkSMGioiaDA (1993) Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal36(2): 239–270.
108.
ThomasJBShanksterLJMathieuJE (1994) Antecedents to organizational issue interpretation: The roles of single-level, cross-level, and content cues. Academy of Management Journal37(5): 1252–1284.
109.
ThompsonJD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
110.
TindaleRS (1993) Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In: CastellanN (ed.) Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 109–124.
111.
WalshJP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science6(3): 280–321.
112.
WeickKE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
113.
WeickKERobertsKH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 357–381.
114.
WeickKESutcliffeKMObstfeldD (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science16(4): 409–421.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
