This article reports on two studies that examine the relationship between performance and strategic issue-framing and decision-processing.The results suggest strong performance promotes a defensive mindset that may lead to dysfunctional outcomes. Study 1 draws its data from 51 CEOs and shows that performance is associated with framing issues as threats rather than opportunities. Study 2 draws its data from 45 top management teams and shows that performance is associated with less comprehensiveness in decision-making. Implications of these findings provide insights into why organizations that perform well sometimes squander their success subsequently through poor decision-making.
Agle, B., Mitchell, R. and Sonnenfeld, J. (1999) `Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values', Academy of Management Journal42: 507-25.
2.
Allison, G.T. (1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown .
3.
Amason, A.C. (1996) `Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams', Academy of Management Journal39: 123-48.
4.
Atuahene-Gima, K. and Li, H. (2004) `Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in Technology Ventures', Academy of Management Journal47: 583-97.
5.
Audia, P.G. (2005) `Regression toward the Mean', Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior1: 1.
6.
Audia, P.G. and Brion, S. (2007) `Reluctant to Change: Self-Sustaining Responses to Diverging Performance Measures', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes102: 255-69.
7.
Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A. and Smith, K.G. (2000) `The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change', Academy of Management Journal43: 837-54.
8.
Bateman, T.S. and Zeithaml, C.P. (1989) `The Psychological Context of Strategic Decisions: A Model and Convergent Experimental Findings', Strategic Management Journal10: 59-74.
9.
Baum, J.R. and Wally, S. (2003) `Strategic Decision Speed and Firm Performance' , Academy of Management Journal24: 1107-29.
10.
Birchall, J. (2005) `Kmart Sees Signs of Sales Turnaround', Financial Times 9 March.
11.
Bourgeois, L.J. (1981) `On the Measurement of Organizational Slack', Academy of Management Review6: 29-39.
12.
Bourgeois, L.J. and Singh, J.V. (1983) `Organizational Slack and Political Behavior among Top Management Teams', Academy of Management Proceedings 43-7.
13.
Bromiley, P. (1991) `Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance', Academy of Management Journal34: 37-59.
14.
Carver, C.S. and Scheier, M.F. (1998) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W.H. and Huber, G.P. (2001) `Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities', Academy of Management Journal44: 937-56.
16.
Cheng, J.L.C. and Kesner, I.F. (1997) `Organizational Slack and Response to Environmental Shifts: The Impact of Resource Allocation Patterns', Journal of Management23: 1-18.
17.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951) `Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests', Psychometrika16: 297-334.
18.
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Daft, R. and Weick, K. (1984) `Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretations Systems', Academy of Management Review9: 284-95.
20.
Dess, G.G. (1987) `Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a Fragmented Industry', Strategic Management Journal8: 259-77.
21.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) `The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields', American Sociological Review48: 147-61.
22.
Dutton, J.E. and Duncan, R.B. (1987) `The Creation of Momentum for Change through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis', Strategic Management Journal8: 279-95.
23.
Dutton, J.E. and Jackson, S.E. (1987) `Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action', Academy of Management Review12: 76-90.
24.
Dutton, J.E., Fahey, L. and Narayanan, V.K. (1983) `Toward Understanding Strategic Issue Diagnosis' , Strategic Management Journal4: 43-60.
25.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) `Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments', Academy of Management Journal32: 543-76.
Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S. and Schendel, D. (1996) `Strategic Reference Point Theory', Strategic Management Journal17: 219-35.
28.
Forbes, D.P. (2005) `Managerial Determinants of Design Speed in New Ventures', Strategic Management Journal26: 355-66.
29.
Fredrickson, J.W. (1985) `Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes', Academy of Management Journal28: 821-43.
30.
Fredrickson, J.W. and Iaquinto, A.L. (1989) `Inertia and Creeping Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes', Academy of Management Journal32: 516-42.
31.
Fredrickson, J.W. and Mitchell, T.R. (1984) `Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment', Academy of Management Journal27: 399-423.
32.
George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S.B. and Barden, J. (2006) `Cognitive Underpinnings of Institutional Persistence and Change: A Framing Perspective', Academy of Management Review31: 347-65.
33.
Ginsberg, A. (1988) `Measuring and Modeling Changes in Strategy: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Directions', Strategic Management Journal9: 559-76.
Greve, H.R. (2003) `A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding', Academy of Management Journal46: 685-702.
36.
Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M.A. and Fredrickson, J.W. (1993) `Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of its Determinants', Strategic Management Journal14: 401-18.
37.
Hamilton, B.H. and Nickerson, J.A. (2003) `Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research', Strategic Organization1: 51-78.
38.
Heath, C., Larrick, R.P., and Wu, G. (1999) `Goals as Reference Points', Cognitive Psychology38: 79-109.
39.
Heckman, J. (1979) `Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error' , Econometrica47: 153-61.
40.
Hedberg, B.Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (1976) `Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization', Administrative Science Quarterly21: 41-65.
41.
Hickson, D.J., Butler, R.J., Cray, D., Mallory, G.R. and Wilson, D.C. (1986) Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
42.
Isenberg, D.J. (1986) `Thinking and Managing: A Verbal Protocol Analysis' , Academy of Management Journal29: 775-89.
43.
Jackson, S.E. and Dutton, J.E. (1988) `Discerning Threats and Opportunities', Administrative Science Quarterly33: 370-87.
44.
Janis, I. (1982) Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
45.
Judge, W.Q. and Miller, A. (1991) `Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts', Academy of Management Journal34: 449-63.
46.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) `Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', Econometrica47: 263-91.
Lindsley, H., Brass, D.J. and Thomas, J.B. (1995) `Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multi-Level Perspective' , Academy of Management Review20: 645-78.
49.
Locke, E.A. (1986) `Generalizing from Laboratory to Field: Ecological Validity or Abstraction of Essential Elements?', in E. A. Locke (ed.) Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Studies , pp. 3-9. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
50.
Marino, K.E. and Lange, D.R. (1983) `Measuring Organizational Slack: A Note on the Convergence and Divergence of Alternative Operational Definitions', Journal of Management9: 81-92.
51.
Meindl, J.R. and Ehrlich, S.B. (1987) `The Romance of Leadership and the Evaluation of Organizational Performance', Academy of Management Review30: 91-109.
52.
Mervis, C.B. and Rosch, E. (1981) `Categorization of Natural Objects', Annual Review of Psychology32: 89-115.
53.
Miller, D. (1992) `The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring about Their Own Downfall', Business Horizons35: 24-35.
54.
Miller, K.D. and Leiblein, M.J. (1996) `Corporate Risk-Return Relations: Returns Variability versus Downside Risk', Academy of Management Journal39: 91-122.
55.
Milliken, F.J. and Lant, T.K. (1991) `The Effect of an Organization's Recent Performance History on Strategic Persistence and Change: The Role of Managerial Interpretations' , Advances in Strategic Management7: 129-56.
56.
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. (1976) `The Structure of Unstructured Decision Processes' , Administrative Science Quarterly21: 192-205.
57.
Mittal, V. and Ross, W.T. (1998) `The Impact of Positive and Negative Affect and Issue Framing on Issue Interpretation and Risk Taking', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76: 298-324.
58.
Moses, O.D. (1992) `Organizational Slack and Risk-Taking Behaviour: Tests of Product Pricing Strategy', Journal of Organizational Change Management5: 38-54.
59.
Narayanan, V.K. and Fahey, L. (1982) `The Micro-Politics of Strategy Formulation', Academy of Management Review7: 25-34.
60.
Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. (1996) `Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?', Academy of Management Journal39(5): 1245-64
61.
Norburn, D. (1989) `The Chief Executive: A Breed Apart', Strategic Management Journal10: 1-15.
62.
Panzano, P.C. and Billings, R.S. (1994) `The Influence of Issue Frame and Organizational Slack on Risky Decision Making: A Field Study', Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings 377-81.
63.
Park, K.M. (2007) `Antecedents of Convergence and Divergence in Strategic Positioning: The Effects of Performance and Aspiration on the Direction of Strategic Change', Organization Science18: 386-402.
64.
Pedhazur, E.J. and Schmelkin, L.P. (1991) Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
Perlow, L.A., Okhuysen, G.A. and Repenning, N.P. (2002) `The Speed Trap: Exploring the Relationship between Decision Making and Temporal Context', Academy of Management Journal45: 933-55.
66.
Rajagopalan, N., Rasheed, A. and Datta, D. (1993) `Strategic Decision Process: Critical Review and Future Directions', Journal of Management19: 349-84.
67.
Rosch, E. (1975) `Cognitive Reference Points', Cognitive Psychology7: 573-605.
68.
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. (1975) `Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories', Cognitive Psychology7: 573-605.
69.
Sharfman, M.P. and Dean, J.W. (1997) `Flexibility in Strategic Decision Making: Informational and Ideological Perspectives', Journal of Management Studies34: 191-217.
70.
Sharfman, M.P., Wolf, G., Chase, R.B. and Tansik, D.A. (1988) `Antecedents of Organizational Slack', Academy of Management Review13: 601-14.
71.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. and Smith, K. (1999) `Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams', Academy of Management Review42: 662-73.
72.
Singh, J.V. (1986) `Performance, Slack, and Risk-Taking in Organizational Decision Making', Academy of Management Journal29: 562-85.
73.
Starbuck, W.H. and Milliken, F.J. (1988) `Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds until Something Breaks', Journal of Management Studies25: 319-340.
74.
Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E. and Dutton, J.E. (1981) `Threat-Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multi-Level Analysis', Administrative Science Quarterly26: 501-24.
75.
Thomas, J. and McDaniel, R. (1990) `Interpreting Strategic Issues: Effects of Strategic and the Information-Processing Structure of Top Management Teams', Academy of Management Journal33(2): 286-306.
76.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983) `Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment', Psychological Review90: 293-315.
77.
Whyte, G. (1993) `Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes54: 430-55.
