This article extends previous research on how work continues in the face of disruption by theorizing continuity as patterning and highlighting the difference between continuity of a thing and continuity as a process. Based on interviews with people who continued providing mental health care during and after the disruption caused by Hurricane Katrina, we show that continuity is a dynamic process that entails people orienting to what actions they can take and how they can connect these actions into paths in an unfolding material, social, and personal situation. The paths, taken together, are a pattern of work (in our case, a pattern of mental health care). While recognizing that exogenous goals play a role, we highlight the importance of the endogenous experience of an activity in taking action and creating paths. Viewing continuity as patterning suggests new roles for organizations in supporting flexible responses to disruption.
BarleySR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CAT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly31: 78–108.
2.
BensenCBlairRHolandezR, et al. (2006) Coping with Katrina: Mental healthcare services in New Orleans: Challenges and opportunities. Final report, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
3.
BergsonH (1992 [1946]) The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics (Trans. Mabelle L. Andison). New York: Citadel Press.
4.
BeunzaDStarkD (2003) The organization of responsiveness: Innovation and recovery in the trading rooms of Lower Manhattan. Socio-Economic Review1: 135–164.
5.
Boe-LillegravenS (2019) Transferring routines across multiple boundaries: A flexible approach. In: FeldmanMSD’AdderioLDittrichK, et al. (eds) Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 31–53.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) Assessment of health related needs after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita-Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, New Orleans Area, Louisiana. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report55: 38–41.
7.
CharmazK (2001) Grounded theory. In: EmersonRM (ed.) Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, 2nd edn.Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 235–252.
8.
ChiaR (2002) Essai: Time, duration and simultaneity: Rethinking process and change in organizational analysis. Organization Studies23: 863–868.
9.
ChiaRHoltR (2009) Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChristiansonMKFarkasMTSutcliffeKM, et al. (2009) Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. Organization Science20(5): 846–860.
11.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
12.
CzarniawskaB (2004) On time, space and action nets. Organization11(6): 777–795.
Danner-SchröderAGeigerD (2016) Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science27(3): 633–658.
15.
DeanKLLangleyAKKataokaSH, et al. (2008) School-based disaster mental health services: Clinical, policy, and community challenges. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice39(1): 52–57.
16.
DeSalvoKBHyreADOmpadDC, et al. (2007) Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in a New Orleans workforce following Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Urban Health84: 142–152.
17.
EberhardJFrostARerupC (2019) The dark side of routine dynamics: Deceit and the Work OF Romeo pimps. In: FeldmanMSD’AdderioLDittrichK, et al. (eds) Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 99–122.
18.
ElliottDMacphersonA (2010) Policy and practice: Recursive learning from crisis. Group & Organization Management35(5): 572–605.
19.
FeldmanMS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science11(6): 611–629.
20.
FeldmanMS (2016) Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In: Howard-GrenvilleJARerupCLangleyA, et al. (eds) Organizational Routines: A Process Perspective. Perspectives on Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.
21.
GarudRGehmanJKumaraswamyA, et al. (2017) From the process of innovation to innovation as process. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 451–465.
22.
GeigerDDanner-SchröderAKremserW (2020) Getting ahead of time—Performing temporal boundaries to coordinate routines under temporal uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly66(1): 220–264.
23.
GohKPentlandBT (2019) From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal62(6): 1901–1929.
24.
GriffiesWS (2010) Health care infrastructure post-Katrina: Disaster planning to return health care workers to their home communities. Psychiatric Services61(1): 70–73.
25.
GubaEGLincolnY (1995) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, pp. 105–117.
26.
HæremTPentlandBTMillerKD (2015) Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Academy of Management Review40: 446–460.
27.
HatchMJ (1999) Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies20(1): 75–100.
28.
HernesT (2014) A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HolsteinJAGubriumJF (1995) The Active Interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
JarzabkowskiPJLêJKFeldmanMS (2012) Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organization Science23(4): 907–927.
31.
JaycoxLHTanielianTLSharmaPMorseL, et al. (2007) Schools’ mental health responses after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Psychiatric Services58(10): 1339–1343.
32.
KaplanSOrlikowskiWJ (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science24(4): 965–995.
33.
KimABansalPHaughH (2019) No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal62(2): 607–634.
34.
KremserWBlagoevB (2020) The dynamics of prioritizing: How actors temporally pattern complex role–routine ecologies. Administrative Science Quarterly66: 339–379.
35.
KremserWPentlandBTBrunswickerS (2019) Interdependence within and between routines: A performative perspective. In: FeldmanMSD’AdderioLDittrichK, et al. (eds). Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 79–98.
36.
KrepsGABosworthSL (2007) Organizational adaptation to disaster. In: RodríguezHQuarantelliELDynesRR (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, pp. 297–315.
37.
LambergL (2008) Katrina’s mental health impact lingers: Patients face shortages of facilities, clinicians. Journal of the American Medical Association300(9): 1011–1013.
38.
LangleyATsoukasH (2017) Introduction. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 1–28.
39.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasH, et al. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal56: 1–13.
40.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
LoflandJSnowDAndersonL, et al. (2006) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
42.
MeadGH (1936) Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
MoynihanDP (2008) Learning under uncertainty: Netwo in crisis management. Public Administration Review68(2): 350–365.
44.
NicoliniD (2017) Is small the only beautiful? Making sense of “large phenomena” from a practice-based perspective. In: HuiASchatzkiTShoveE (eds) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners. New York: Routledge, pp. 98–113.
45.
NorrisFHRosenCS (2009) Innovations in disaster mental health services and evaluation: National, state, and local responses to Hurricane Katrina (Introduction to the Special Issue). Admin Policy Mental Health36: 159–164.
46.
PauchantTCMitroffII (1990) Crisis management: Managing paradox in a chaotic world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change38(2): 117–134.
47.
PearsonCMClairJA (1998) Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review23(1): 59–76.
48.
PentlandBTMahringerCADittrichK, et al. (2020) Process multiplicity and process dynamics: Weaving the space of possible paths. Organization Theory1: 1–21.
49.
PowleyEH (2009) Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations62(9): 1289–1326.
50.
QuarantelliELLagadecPBoinA (2007) A Heuristic approach to future disasters and crises: New, old, and in-between types. In: RodríguezHQuarantelliELDynesRR (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, pp. 16–41.
51.
ReinekeJAnsariS (2015) When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal58(2): 618–648.
52.
ReinekeJAnsariS (2017) Time, temporality and process studies. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 402–416.
53.
RodríguezHQuarantelliELDynesRR (2007) Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer.
54.
RudowitzRRowlandDShartzerA (2006) Health care in New Orleans before and after Katrina. Health Affairs25(5): 393–406.
55.
SchatzkiT (2016) Practice theory as flat ontology. In: SpaargarenGWeeninkDLamersM (eds) Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 28–42.
56.
SeegerMWUlmerRRNovakJM, et al. (2005) Post-crisis discourse and organizational change, failure and renewal. Journal of Organizational Change Management18(1): 78–95.
57.
ShotterJ (2006) Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies27(4): 585–604.
58.
ShotterJ (2008) Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization Studies29(4): 501–524.
59.
StinchcombeAL (1965) Social structure and organization. In: MarchJG (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp. 142–193.
60.
SuchmanLA (2007) Human-machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn.New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TavoryI (2018) Between situations: Anticipation, rhythms, and the theory of interaction. Sociological Theory36(2): 117–133.
62.
TavoryIEliasophN (2013) Coordinating futures: Toward a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology118(4): 908–942.
63.
TavoryIFineGA (2020) Disruption and the theory of the interaction order. Theory and Society49: 365–385.
64.
TsingAL (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
TurnerSFRindovaV (2018) Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal61: 1253–1280.
66.
United States Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2009a) Barriers to mental health services for children persist in greater New Orleans although federal grants are helping to address them. Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO. Report no. 09-563. Washington, DC: GAO.
67.
United States Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2009b) Hurricane Katrina: Federal grants have helped health care organizations provide primary care but challenges remain. Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO. Report no. 09-598. Washington, DC: GAO.
68.
VéronneauSCimonYRoyJ (2013) A model for improving organizational continuity. Journal of Transportation Security6: 209–220.
69.
WeislerRHIVBarbeeJGTownsend MarkMH (2006) Mental health and recovery in the gulf coast after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Journal of the American Medical Association296(5): 585–588.
