Qualitative comparative analysis is increasingly applied in strategy and organization research. The main purpose of our essay is to support this growing community of qualitative comparative analysis scholars by identifying best practices that can help guide researchers through the key stages of a qualitative comparative analysis empirical study (model building, sampling, calibration, data analysis, reporting, and interpretation of findings) and by providing examples of such practices drawn from strategy and organization studies. Coupled with this main purpose, we respond to Miller’s essay on configuration research by highlighting our points of agreement regarding his recommendations for configurational research and by addressing some of his concerns regarding qualitative comparative analysis. Our article thus contributes to configurational research by articulating how to leverage qualitative comparative analysis for enriching configurational theories of strategy and organization.
AmentaEPoulsenJD (2005) Where to begin: A survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research23: 22–53.
2.
AversaPFurnariSHaefligerS (2015) Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013. Industrial and Corporate Change24: 655–676.
3.
BromleyPHwangHPowellWW (2012) Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the U.S. nonprofit sector. M@n@gement15: 468–501.
4.
CooperBGlaesserJ (2011) Using case-based approaches to analyse large datasets: A comparison of Ragin’s fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology14: 31–48.
5.
CrillyDZolloMHansenMT (2012) Faking or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal55: 1429–1448.
6.
DelbridgeRFissPC (2013) Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review38: 325–331.
7.
DwivediPJoshiAMisangyiVD (2018) Gender-inclusive gatekeeping: How (mostly male) predecessors influence the success of female CEOs. Academy of Management Journal61(2): 379–404.
8.
FissPC (2007) Towards a set-theoretic approach for studying organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review32: 1180–1198.
9.
FissPC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal54: 393–420.
10.
FissPCCambréBMarxA (2013) Configurational theory and methods in organizational research. Research in the Sociology of Organizations38: 1–22.
11.
Garcia-CastroRAguileraRVAriñoMA (2013) Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review32: 390–407.
12.
GrandoriAFurnariS (2008) A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design. Organization Studies29: 459–485.
13.
GrandoriAFurnariS (2013) Configurational analysis and organization design: Towards a theory of structural heterogeneity. Research in the Sociology of Organizations38: 79–107.
14.
GreckhamerT (2011) Cross-cultural differences in compensation level and inequality across occupations: A set-theoretic analysis. Organization Studies32(1): 85–115.
15.
GreckhamerT (2016) CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions. Strategic Management Journal37: 793–815.
16.
GreckhamerTMisangyiVFFissPC (2013) The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set-theoretic approach. Research in the Sociology of Organizations38: 49–75.
17.
GreckhamerTMisangyiVFElmsH, et al. (2008) Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods11: 695–726.
18.
HaxhiIAguileraRV (2017) An institutional configurational approach to cross-national diversity in corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies54: 261–303.
19.
KetchenDJ (2013) We try harder: Some reflections on configurational theory and methods. Research in the Sociology of Organizations38: 303–309.
20.
KetchenDJShookCL (1996) The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal17: 441–458.
21.
MahoneyJGoertzG (2004) The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research. American Political Science Review98: 653–669.
22.
MarxA (2010) Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches4: 138–158.
23.
MeyerADTsuiASHiningsCR (1993) Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal36: 1175–1195.
24.
MilesRESnowCC (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (in Collaboration with MeyerAlan D and with Contributions by ColemanHenry JJr). New York: McGraw Hill.
25.
MillerD (2017) Challenging trends in configurations research: Where are the configurations?Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 5 September. DOI: 10.1177/1476127017729315.
26.
MillerDFriesenPH (1978) Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science24: 921–933.
MisangyiVFAcharyaAG (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal57: 1681–1705.
29.
MisangyiVFGreckhamerTFurnariS, et al. (2017) Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management43: 255–282.
30.
RaginCC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
RaginCC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
RaginCC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
RaginCCFissPC (2008) Net effects versus configurations: An empirical demonstration. In: RaginC (ed.) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 190–212.
34.
RaginCCFissPC (2017) Intersectional Inequality: Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
RihouxBRaginCC (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
36.
SchneiderCQRohlfingI (2016) Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency: Formalizing case selection and causal inference. Sociological Methods & Research45: 526–568.
37.
SchneiderCQWagemannC (2010) Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology9: 397–418.
38.
SchneiderCQWagemannC (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SodaGFurnariS (2012) Exploring the topology of the plausible: Fs/QCA counterfactual analysis and the plausible fit of unobserved organizational configurations. Strategic Organization10: 285–296.
