This study examines the effect of racial/ethnic minority CEOs and diverse corporate boards on corporate governance and product development. We test an author-constructed dataset of corporate practices, CEO race/ethnicity, and board racial/ethnic composition in Fortune 500 firms from 2001 to 2010. Findings suggest that diverse boards are positively associated with effective corporate governance practices and product development. Moreover, an interactive effect occurs between a diverse board and the race/ethnicity of the CEO in that corporate governance strengths and product innovation for the firm are increased when a White CEO operates with a diverse board. Thus, while promoting individual minority leaders is important, board diversity is paramount for achieving corporate benefits.
AllmendingerJ.HackmanJ. R. (2005) “The More, the Better? A Four Nation Study of the Inclusion of Women in Symphony Orchestras,” Social Forces74(2): 423–60.
4.
AvolioB.BassB.JungD. (1999) “Re-Examining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology72: 441–62.
5.
BacharachS.BambergerP.VashdiD. (2005) “Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations among White and African-American Peers,” Academy of Management Journal48(4): 619–44.
6.
Bassett-JonesN. (2005) “The Paradox of Diversity Management, Creativity and Innovation,” Creativity and Innovation Management14(2): 169–75.
7.
BearS.RahmanN.PostC. (2010) “The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation,” Journal of Business Ethics97: 207–21.
8.
BellE.NkomoS. (2001) Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Professional Identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
BilimoriaD. (2006) “The Relationship between Women Corporate Directors and Women Corporate Officers,” Journal of Managerial Issues18(1): 47–61.
10.
BoboL.KluegelJ. (1993) “Opposition to Race-Targeting: Self-Interest, Stratification Ideology or Racial Attitudes?” American Sociological Review58(4): 443–64.
11.
BrattonK. (2005) “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislators,” Politics and Gender1: 97–125.
12.
BrownD. H.BrownD. L.AnastasopoulosV. (2002) Women on Boards: Not Just the Right Thing … But the “Bright” Thing. Ottawa, ON, Canada: The Conference Board of Canada.
13.
BurkeR. J. (1997) “Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: A Needed Resource,” Journal of Business Ethics16: 909–15.
14.
CannellaA. A.ParkJ.LeeH. (2008) “Top Management Team Functional Background Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Roles of Team Member Co-Location and Environmental Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Journal51: 768–84.
15.
CarterD.D’SouzaF.SimkinsB.SimpsonW. G. (2010) “The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance,” Corporate Governance18(5): 396–414.
16.
CarterD.SimkinsB.SimpsonW. G. (2003) “Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value,” The Financial Review38: 33–53.
17.
ChamblissE.UggenC. (2000) “Men and Women of Elite Law Firms: Reevaluating Kanter’s Legacy,” Law & Social Inquiry25: 41–68.
18.
CharanR. (1998) Boards at Work: How Corporate Boards Create Competitive Advantage. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
19.
ChenR.DyballM.WrightS. (2009) “The Link between Board Composition and Corporate Diversification in Australian Corporations,” Corporate Governance: An International Review17: 208–23.
20.
Chung-HerreraB.LankauM. (2005) “Are We There Yet? An Assessment of Fit between Stereotypes of Minority Managers and the Successful-Manager Prototype,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology35: 2029–56.
21.
CohenL.BrosschakJ.HavemanH. (1998) “And Then There Were More? The Effect of Organizational Sex Composition on the Hiring and Promotion of Managers,” American Sociological Review63(5): 711–27.
22.
CohenP.HuffmanM. (2007) “Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap,” American Sociological Review72: 681–704.
23.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective of Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–52.
24.
CollinsS. (1997) “Black Mobility in White Corporations: Up the Corporate Ladder but Out on a Limb,” Social Problems44(1): 55–68.
25.
CoxT. H.BlakeS. (1991) “Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness,” Academy of Management Executive5(3): 45–56.
26.
CoxT. H.LobelS. A.McLeodP. L. (1991) “Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior on a Group Task,” Academy of Management Journal34: 827–47.
27.
DawsonJ. (2014) “Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how,” Journal of Business Psychology29: 1–19.
28.
DembA.Friedrich NeubauerF. (1992) The Corporate Board. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
DentonT. (1990) “Bonding and Supportive Relationships among Black Professional Women: Rituals of Restoration,” Journal of Organizational Behavior11(6): 447–57.
30.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C.van EngenM. L. (2003) “Transformational, Transactional and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men,” Psychological Bulletin129(4): 569–91.
31.
EdmonsonA. (2002) “The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective,” Organization Science13: 128–48.
32.
EdmonsonA.BohmerR.PisanoG. (2001) “Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals,” Administrative Science Quarterly46: 685–716.
33.
EisenhardtK. M.KahwajyJ. L.BourgeoisL. J. (1997) “How Management Teams Can Have a Good Fight,” Harvard Business Review75(4): 77–85.
34.
ElenkovD.JudgeW.WrightP. (2005) “Strategic Leadership and Executive Innovation Influence: An International Multi-Cluster Comparative Study,” Strategic Management Journal26: 665–82.
35.
ElyR. J. (1995) “Power in Demography: Women’s Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work,” Academy of Management Journal38: 589–634.
36.
ElyR. J.ThomasD. A. (2001) “Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Process and Outcomes,” Administrative Science Quarterly46: 229–73.
37.
ElyR. J.PadavicI.ThomasD. A. (2012) “Racial Diversity, Racial Asymmetries and Team Learning Environment: Effects on Performance,” Organization Studies33(3): 341–62.
38.
FerrisS.JagannathanM.PritchardA. (2003) “Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments,” Journal of Finance58: 1087–112.
39.
FondasN.SassalosS. (2000) “A Different Voice in the Boardroom: How the Presence of Women Directors Affects Board Influence over Management,” Global Focus12: 13–22.
40.
FrancoeurC.LabelleR.Sinclair-DesgagneB. (2008) “Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management,” Journal of Business Ethics81: 83–95.
41.
GoodsteinJ.GautamK.BoekerW. (1994) “The Effects of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change,” Strategic Management Journal15: 241–50.
42.
GutekB.CohenA. (1987) “Sex Ratios, Sex Role Spillover, and Sex at Work: A Comparison of Men and Women’s Experiences,” Human Relations40: 97–115.
43.
HambrickD.ChoT.ChenM. (1996) “The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves,” Administrative Science Quarterly41(4): 659–84.
44.
HartT. A.SharfmanM. (2012) “Assessing the Concurrent Validity of the Revised Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini Corporate Social Performance Indicators,” Business & Society. Epub ahead of print 9September. DOI: 10.1177/0007650312455793.
45.
HarveyC.MacleanM. (2010) “Transnational Boards and Governance Regimes: A Franco-British Comparison,” in DjelicM. L.QuackS. (eds) Transnational Communities, pp. 107–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
HaunschildP. R. (1993) “Inter-Organizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity,” Administrative Science Quarterly38: 564–92.
47.
HeilmanM.WallenA.FuchsD.TamkinsM. (2004) “Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks,” Journal of Applied Psychology89: 416–27.
48.
HewlinP. (2003) “And the Award for Best Actor Goes To … Facades of Conformity in Organizational Settings,” Academy of Management Review28(4): 633–42.
49.
HillmanA.CannellaA.JrHarrisI. (2002) “Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How Do Directors Differ?” Journal of Management28(6): 747–63.
50.
HoffmanR.HegartyH. (1993) “Top Management Influence on Innovations: Effects of Executive Characteristics and Culture,” Journal of Management19: 549–74.
51.
HoggM. (2001) “A Social Identity Theory of Leadership,” Personality and Social Psychology Review5: 184–200.
52.
HoggM.van KnippenbergD.RastD. (2012) “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review37(2): 232–55.
53.
HowtonS.HowtonS.OlsonG. (2001) “Board Ownership and IPO Returns,” Journal of Economics and Finance25: 100–12.
54.
HullC. E.RothenbergS. (2008) “Firm Performance: The Interactions of Corporate Social Performance with Innovation and Industry Differentiation,” Strategic Management Journal29: 781–9.
55.
HülshegerU.SalgadoJ.AndersonN. (2009) “Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research,” Journal of Applied Psychology94(5): 1128–45.
56.
IbarraH. (1993) “Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework,” Academy of Management Review18: 56–87.
57.
IbrahimN.HowardD.AngelidisJ. (2003) “Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type,” Journal of Business Ethics47: 393–401.
58.
JacksonS.JoshiA. (2011) “Work Team Diversity,” in ZedackS. (ed.) APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 651–86. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59.
JacksonS. E.MayK. E.WhitneyK. (1995) “Understanding the Dynamics of Diversity in Decision-Making Teams,” in GuzzoR. A.SalasE. (eds) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, pp. 204–61. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
JohnK.SenbetL. (1998) “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness,” Journal of Banking & Finance22(4): 371–403.
61.
KanterR. M. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
62.
KirkmanB.TeslukP.RosenB. (2004) “The Impact of Demographic Heterogeneity and Team Leader-Team Member Demographic Fit on Team Empowerment and Effectiveness,” Group & Organization Management29: 334–68.
63.
KnightD.PearceC.SmithK.OlianJ.SimsH.SmithK.FloodP. (1999) “Top Management Team Diversity, Group Process and Strategic Consensus,” Strategic Management Journal20: 445–65.
64.
KochanT.BezrukovaK.ElyR.JacksonS.JoshiA.JehnK.LeonardJ.LevineD.ThomasD. (2003) “The Effects of Diversity on Business Performance: Report of the Diversity Research Network,” Human Resource Management42(1): 3–21.
65.
KonradA. M.KramerV.ErkutS. (2008) “Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards,” Organizational Dynamics37(2): 145–64.
66.
KramerV. W.KonradA. M.ErkutS. (2006) Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance. Wellesley Centers for Women, Report no. WCW 11. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
67.
LivingstonR. W.RosetteA. S.WashingtonE. F. (2012) “Can an Agentic Black Woman Get Ahead? The Impact of Race and Interpersonal Dominance on Perceptions of Female Leaders,” Psychological Science24(2): 354–8.
68.
McGuireG. (2002) “Gender, Race and the Shadow of Structure: A Study of Informal Networks and Inequality in a Work Organization,” Gender & Society16: 303–22.
69.
McGuireG.ReskinB. (1993) “Authority Hierarchies at Work. The Impacts of Race and Sex,” Gender & Society7: 487–506.
70.
McInerney-LacombeN.BilimoriaD.SalipanteP. F. (2008) “Championing Tough Issues: How Women Corporate Directors Contribute to Board Deliberations,” in VinnicombeS.SinghV.BurkeR. J.BilimoriaD.HuseM. (eds) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: Research and Practice, pp. 123–39. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
71.
MacleanM.HarveyC.KlingG. (2014) “Pathways to Power: Class, Hyper-Agency and the French Corporate Elite,” Organization Studies35(6): 825–55.
72.
MatsaD. A.MillerA. R. (2013) “A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics5(3): 136–69.
73.
MattinglyJ. E.BermanS. L. (2006) “Measurement of Corporate Social Action: Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini Ratings Data,” Business & Society45(1): 20–46.
74.
MilesR.SnowC.MeyerA.ColemanH. (1978) “Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process,” Academy of Management Review3(3): 546–62.
75.
MillerT.TrianaM. D. C. (2009) “Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity-Firm Performance Relationship,” Journal of Management Studies46(5): 755–86.
76.
MillikenF.MartinsL. (1996) “Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups,” Academy of Management Journal21: 402–33.
77.
MizruchiM. S. (1996) “What do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates,” Annual Review of Sociology22: 271–98.
78.
MooreG. (1988) “Women in Elite Positions: Insiders or Outsiders?” Sociological Forum3: 566–85.
79.
NesbittP. (1997) “Gender, Tokenism and the Construction of Elite Clergy Careers,” Review of Religious Research38(3): 193–210.
80.
O’ReillyC.CaldwellD.BarnettW. (1989) “Work Group Demography, Social Integration and Turnover,” Administrative Science Quarterly34: 21–37.
81.
Ortiz-de-MandojanaN.Aragon-CorreaJ. A. (2013) “Boards and Sustainability: The Contingent Influence of Director Interlocks on Corporate Environmental Performance,” Business Strategy and the Environment. Epub ahead of print 5December. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1833.
82.
ØstergaardC. R.TimmermansB.KristinssonK. (2011) “Does a Different View Create Something New? The Effect of Employee Diversity on Innovation,” Research Policy40: 500–9.
83.
PapadakisV.BourantasD. (1998) “The CEO as Corporate Champion of Technological Innovation: An Empirical Investigation,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management10(1): 89–109.
84.
PapadakisV.LioukasS.ChambersD. (1998) “Strategic Decision-Making Processes: The Role of Management and Context,” Strategic Management Journal19(2): 115–48.
85.
PapagiannakisG.VoudrourisI.LioukasS. (2014) “The road to sustainability: Exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time,” Business Strategy and the Environment23(4): 254–271.
86.
ParkS. H.WestphalJ.SternI. (2011) “Set Up for a Fall: The Insidious Effects of Flattery and Opinion Conformity toward Corporate Leaders,” Administrative Science Quarterly56(2): 257–302.
87.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999) “Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly44: 1–28.
88.
Perry-SmithJ. E. (2006) “Social Yet Creative: The Role of Social Relationships in Facilitating Individual Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal49: 85–101.
89.
PostC.RahmanN.RubowE. (2011) “Green Governance: Boards of Directors’ Composition and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business & Society50(1): 189–223.
90.
RaginsB. R. (1997) “Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective,” Academy of Management Review22: 482–521.
91.
SealyR.SinghV.VinnicombeS. (2007) The Female FTSE Report. Cranfield: UK.
92.
SharfmanM. (1996) “The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Performance Ratings Data,” Journal of Business Ethics15(3): 287–96.
93.
ShropshireC. (2010) “The Role of Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in the Diffusion of Practices,” Academy of Management Review35: 246–64.
94.
SinghV. (2008) “Transforming Boardroom Cultures in Science, Engineering and Technology Organizations,” Report for UK Resource Centre for Women in STEM, UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology, Bradford, July.
95.
SinghV.VinnicombeS. (2004) “Why so Few Women Directors in Top UK Boardrooms? Evidence and Theoretical Explanations,” Corporate Governance12(4): 479–88.
96.
SkaggsS.StainbackK.DuncanP. (2012) “Shaking Things Up or Business as Usual? The Influence of Female Corporate Executives and Board of Directors on Women’s Managerial Representation,” Social Science Research41: 936–48.
97.
SmithR. (2005) “Do the Determinants of Promotion Differ for White Men Versus Women and Minorities? An Exploration of Intersectionalism through Sponsored and Contest Mobility Processes,” American Behavioral Scientist48(9): 1157–81.
98.
StainbackK.KwonS. (2012) “Female Leaders, Organizational Power and Sex Segregation,” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science639: 217–35.
99.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002) “Contending with Group Image: The Psychology of Stereotype and Social Identity Threat,” in ZannaM. P. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 379–440. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
100.
SwannW. B.JrPolzerJ. T.SeyleD. C.KoS. J. (2004) “Finding Value in Diversity: Verification of Personal and Social Self-Views,” Academy of Management Review29: 9–27.
101.
TajfelH. (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
102.
TaylorC. (2010) “Occupational Sex Composition and the Gendered Availability of Workplace Support,” Gender & Society24(2): 189–212.
103.
TerjesenS.SinghV. (2008) “Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context,” Journal of Business Ethics83(1): 55–63.
104.
ThongJ.YapC. (1995) “CEO Characteristics, Organizational Characteristics and Information Technology Adoption in Small Businesses,” Omega23(4): 429–42.
105.
TorchiaM.CalabroA.HuseM. (2011) “Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass,” Journal of Business Ethics102: 299–317.
106.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005) “Relationships between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice among Minority and Majority Status Groups,” Psychological Science16: 951–7.
107.
TuggleC. S.SchnatterlyK.JohnsonR. A. (2010) “Attention Patterns in the Boardroom: How Board Composition and Processes Affect Discussion of Entrepreneurial Issues,” Academy of Management Journal53: 550–71.
108.
Van der VegtG. S.JanssenO. (2003) “Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation,” Journal of Management29: 729–51.
109.
Van KnippenbergD.SchippersM. C. (2007) “Work Group Diversity,” Annual Review of Psychology58: 515–41.
110.
VinnicombeS.SinghV.BurkeR.BilimoriaD.HuseM. (2008) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: Research and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
111.
WaddockS. A.GravesS. B. (1997) “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link,” Strategic Management Journal18(4): 303–19.
WaldmanD. A.SiegelD. S.JavidanM. (2006) “Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Management Studies43: 1703–25.
114.
WallsJ.BerroneP.PhanP. (2012) “Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link?” Strategic Management Journal33(8): 885–913.
115.
WallsJ. L.HoffmanA. J. (2013) “Exceptional Boards: Environmental Experience and Positive Deviance from Institutional Norms,” Journal of Organizational Behavior34(2): 253–71.
116.
WangJ.CoffeyB. S. (1992) “Board Composition and Corporate Philanthropy,” Journal of Business Ethics11: 771–8.
117.
WebbE. (2004) “An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms’ Board Structure,” Journal of Management and Governance8: 255–77.
118.
WestphalJ. D.FredricksonJ. W. (2001) “Who Directs Strategic Change? Director Experience, the Selection of New CEOs, and Change in Corporate Strategy,” Strategic Management Journal22(12): 1113–37.
119.
WestphalJ. D.MiltonL. P. (2000) “How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards,” Administrative Science Quarterly45: 366–98.
120.
WestphalJ. D.SternI. (2006) “The Other Pathway to the Boardroom: Interpersonal Influence Behavior as a Substitute for Elite Credentials and Majority Status in Obtaining Board Appointments,” Administrative Science Quarterly51: 169–204.
121.
WestphalJ. D.SternI. (2007) “Flattery Will Get You Everywhere (Especially If You Are a Male Caucasian): How Ingratiation, Boardroom Behavior and Demographic Minority Status Affect Additional Board Appointments at US Companies,” Academy of Management Journal50(2): 267–88.
122.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J. (1995) “Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity and New Director Selection,” Administrative Science Quarterly40(1): 60–83.
123.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J. (1997) “Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity and the Diffusion of Board Independence in US Corporations,” Administrative Science Quarterly42: 161–83.
124.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J. (2013) “A Behavioral Theory of Corporate Governance: Explicating the Mechanisms of Socially Situated and Socially Constituted Agency,” The Academy of Management Annals7(1): 607–61.
125.
WilliamsK.O’ReillyC. (1998) “Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research,” Research in Organizational Behavior20: 77–140.
126.
WincentJ.AnokhinS.OrtqvistD. (2010) “Does Network Board Capital Matter? A Study of Innovative Performance in Strategic SME Networks,” Journal of Business Research63: 265–75.
127.
WingfieldA. (2009) “Racializing the Glass Escalator: Reconsidering Men’s Experiences with Women’s Work,” Gender & Society23(1): 5–26.
128.
WingfieldA. H. (2010) “Are Some Emotions Marked ‘Whites’ Only? Racialized Feeling Rules in Professional Workplaces,” Social Problems57: 251–68.
129.
WoodmanR.SawyerJ.GriffinR. (1993) “Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity,” Academy of Management Review18(2): 293–321.
ZahraS. A.GeorgeG. (2002) “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Review27(2): 185–203.
132.
ZhuD.WestphalJ. (2013) “How Directors’ Prior Experience with other Demographically Similar CEOs Affects Their Appointments onto Corporate Boards and the Consequences for CEO Compensation,” Academy of Management Journal57(3): 791–813.
133.
ZweigenhaftR.DomhoffG. W. (2006) Diversity in the Power Elite: How It Happened, Why It Matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
134.
ZweigenhaftR.DomhoffG. W. (2011) The New CEOs: Women, African American, Latino and Asian American Leaders of Fortune 500 Companies. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
