This study analyzes the impact of racial/ethnic minority leaders on equity and diversity policies. Previous research finds that minority leaders are associated with reduced inequality, yet the ways in which these leaders impact organizational policies are understudied. Our analysis relies on a unique dataset of corporate practices, CEO race/ethnicity, and board member race/ethnicity in Fortune 500 firms from 2001 to 2010. The authors find that while minority CEOs have minimal impact on equity policies, diverse boards are significantly associated with equitable practices. They conclude that board diversity is critical for shaping corporate practice related to equity and diversity.
AntonioA.ChangM.HakutaK.KennyD.LevinS.MilemJ. (2004) Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science15(8): 507–510.
3.
ArmeniaA.GerstelN.WingC. (2014) Workplace compliance with the law: The case of the Family and Medical Leave Act. Work and Occupations41(3): 277–304.
4.
ArthurM. M.CookA. (2003) The relationship between work-family human resource practices and firm profitability: A multi-theoretical perspective. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management22: 219–252.
5.
AshfordS.RothbardN.PideritS. K.DuttonJ. (1998) Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly43(1): 23–57.
6.
BellE.NkomoS. (2001) Our separate ways: Black and White women and the struggle for professional identity, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
BilimoriaD. (2006) The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues18(1): 47–61.
8.
BoboL.KluegelJ. (1993) Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology or racial attitudes?American Sociological Review58(4): 443–464.
9.
BowenW.BokD. (1998) The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BradshawP.WicksD. (2000) Experiences of White women on corporate boards in Canada: Compliance and non-compliance to hegemonic masculinity. Issues in Business Ethics14: 197–212.
11.
BrowerJ.MahajanV. (2013) Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics117: 313–331.
12.
ByronR. (2010) Discrimination, complexity and the public/private sector question. Work and Occupations37(4): 435–475.
13.
ChangM. (2002) The impact of an undergraduate diversity course requirement on students’ racial views and attitudes. The Journal of General Education51(1): 21–42.
14.
ChenR.DyballM.WrightS. (2009) The link between board composition and corporate diversification in Australian corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review17: 208–223.
15.
Chung-HerreraB.LankauM. (2005) Are we there yet? An assessment of fit between stereotypes of minority managers and the successful-manager prototype. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35: 2029–2056.
16.
CockburnC. (1991) In the way of woman: Men’s resistance to sex equality in organizations, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
17.
CohenL.BrosschakJ.HavemanH. (1998) And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review63(5): 711–727.
18.
CohenP.HuffmanM. (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. American Sociological Review72: 681–704.
19.
CollinsS. (1997) Black mobility in White corporations: Up the corporate ladder but out on a limb. Social Problems44(1): 55–68.
20.
CotterD.DeFioreJ.HermsenJ.KowalewskiB. M.VannemanR. (1997) All women benefit: The macro-level effect of occupational integration on gender earnings inequality. American Sociological Review62(5): 714–734.
21.
CotterD.HermsenJ.VannemanR. (2001) Women’s work and working women: the demand for female labor. Gender & Society15(3): 429–452.
22.
DensonN.ChangM. (2009) Racial diversity matters: The impact of diversity-related student engagement and institutional context. American Educational Research Journal46(2): 322–353.
23.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
24.
DiTomasoN. (2012) The American non-dilemma: Racial inequality without racism, New York, NY: Russell Sage.
25.
DobbinF.KellyE. (2007) How to stop harassment: The professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. American Journal of Sociology112: 1203–1243.
26.
DobbinF.KimS.KalevA. (2011) You can’t always get what you need: Organizational determinants of diversity programs. American Sociological Review76(3): 386–411.
27.
DuguidM. M.LoydD. L.TolbertP. S. (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organization Science23(2): 386–401.
28.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C.van EngenM. L. (2003) Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin129(4): 569–591.
29.
ElliottJ.SmithR. (2001) Ethnic matching of supervisors to subordinate work groups: Findings on bottom-up ascription and social closure. Social Problems48: 258–276.
30.
ElyR. (1995) Power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal38: 589–634.
31.
ElyR.ThomasD. (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly46(2): 229–273.
32.
FondasN.SassalosS. (2000) A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus12: 13–22.
33.
GoldenB. R.ZajacE. J. (2001) When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal22: 1087–1111.
34.
GormanE. (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review70: 702–728.
35.
GormanE.KmecJ. (2009) Hierarchical rank and women’s organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology114: 1428–1474.
36.
GravesS. B.WaddockS. A. (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal37: 1034–1046.
37.
GruenfeldD. H. (1995) Status, ideology and integrative complexity on the US Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68(1): 5–20.
38.
GutekB.CohenA. (1987) Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men and women’s experiences. Human Relations40: 97–115.
39.
HaunschildP. R. (1993) Inter-organizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly38: 564–592.
40.
Heckman, D. R., Foo, M. D., & Yang, W. (2014). Does valuing diversity result in worse performance ratings for minority and female leaders? Unpublished manuscript.
41.
HeilmanM.BlockC.StathatosP. (1997) The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal40(3): 603–625.
42.
HeilmanM.WallenA.FuchsD.TamkinsM. (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology89: 416–427.
43.
HiggenbothamE.WeberL. (1999) Perceptions of workplace discrimination among Blacks and White professional-managerial women. In: BrowneI. (ed.) Latinas and African American women at work: Race, gender and economic inequality, New York, NY: Russell Sage, pp. 327–353.
44.
HillmanA. J.ShropshireC.CanellaA. A. (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 941–952.
45.
HoggM. (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5: 184–200.
46.
HoggM.van KnippenbergD.RastD. (2012) Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review37(2): 232–255.
47.
IbarraH. (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review18: 56–87.
48.
KalevA. (2014) How you downsize is who you downsize: Biased formalization, accountability and managerial diversity. American Sociological Review79(1): 109–135.
49.
KalevA.KellyE.DobbinF. (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review71(4): 589–617.
50.
KanterR. M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation, New York, NY: Basic Books.
51.
KellyE.DobbinF. (1999) Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. American Journal of Sociology105: 455–492.
52.
KonradA. M.KramerV.ErkutS. (2008) Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics37(2): 145–164.
53.
LightR.RosignoV.KalevA. (2011) Racial discrimination, interpretation and legitimation at work. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634(1): 39–59.
54.
LivingstonR. W.RosetteA. S.WashingtonE. F. (2012) Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science24(2): 354–358.
55.
LopezG. E. (2004) Interethnic contact, curriculum and attitudes in the first year of college. Journal of Social Issues60: 75–94.
56.
MattinglyJ. E.BermanS. L. (2006) Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Business & Society45: 20–46.
57.
MaumeD. (1999) Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations26: 483–509.
58.
MaumeD. (2004) Is the glass ceiling a unique form of inequality?Work and Occupations31: 250–274.
59.
McBrierD. B.WilsonG. (2004) Going down? Race and downward occupational mobility for white-collar workers in the 1990s. Work and Occupations31(3): 283–322.
60.
McGuireG. (1999) Do race and sex affect employees’ access to help from mentors? Insights from the study of a large corporation. In: CrosbyF.ElyR.MurrellA. (eds) Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 105–120.
61.
MichelonG.BoessoG.KumarK. (2013) Examining the link between strategic corporate responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management20: 81–94.
62.
MizruchiM. S. (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology22: 271–298.
63.
MongS.RoscignoV. (2010) African American men and the experience of employment discrimination. Qualitative Sociology33(1): 1–21.
64.
MooreG. (1988) Women in elite positions: Insiders or outsiders?Sociological Forum3: 566–585.
65.
Nelson LairdT. F.EngbergM. E.HurtadoS. (2005) Modeling accentuation effects: Enrolling in a diversity course and the importance of social action engagement. Journal of Higher Education76: 448–476.
66.
NesbittP. (1997) Gender, tokenism and the construction of elite clergy careers. Review of Religious Research38(3): 93–210.
67.
ØstergaardC. R.TimmermansB.KristinssonK. (2011) Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy40: 500–509.
68.
PadavicI.ReskinB. (2002) Women and men at work, New York, NY: Sage.
69.
PedrianaN.StrykerR. (2004) The strength of a weak agency: Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the expansion of state capacity. American Journal of Sociology110: 709–760.
70.
PhillipsK. W.LoydD. L. (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes99: 143–160.
71.
PierceJ. (2012) Racing for innocence: Whiteness, gender and the backlash against affirmative action, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
RaeburnN. C. (2004) Lesbian and gay workplace rights: Changing corporate American from inside out, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
73.
ReskinB.RoosP. (1990) Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
74.
ReskinB.RoosP. (1992) Occupational desegregation in the 1970s: Integration and economic equity?Sociological Perspectives35: 69–91.
75.
RoscignoV.WilliamsL.ByronR. (2012) Workplace racial discrimination and middle class vulnerability. American Behavioral Scientist56(5): 696–710.
76.
RoseC.BielbyW. (2011) Race at the top: How companies shape the inclusion of African Americans on their boards in response to institutional pressures. Social Science Research40(3): 841–859.
77.
ShropshireC. (2010) The role of interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review35: 246–264.
78.
ShueyK. M.JovicE. (2013) Disability accommodation in nonstandard and precarious employment arrangements. Work and Occupations40(2): 174–205.
79.
SinghV. (2008) Transforming boardroom cultures in science, engineering and tech organizations (Report for UK Resource Center for Women in STE, No. 8), Bedford, UK: International Centre for Women Business Leaders, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University.
80.
SkaggsS. (2008) Producing change or bagging opportunity? The effects of discrimination litigation on women in supermarket management. American Journal of Sociology113(4): 1148–1183.
81.
SkaggsS.StainbackK.DuncanP. (2012) Shaking things up or business as usual? The influence of female corporate executives and board of directors on women’s managerial representation. Social Science Research41: 936–948.
82.
SmithR. (2005) Do the determinants of promotion differ for white men versus women and minorities? An exploration of intersectionalism through sponsored and contest mobility processes. American Behavioral Scientist48(9): 1157–1181.
83.
SmithR.ElliottJ. (2002) Does ethnic concentration influence employees’ access to authority? An examination of contemporary and organizational change. Social Forces81: 255–279.
84.
StainbackK.KwonS. (2012) Female leaders, organizational power and sex segregation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science639: 217.
85.
StainbackK.Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (2009) Intersections of power and privilege: Long-term trends in managerial representation. American Sociological Review74: 800–820.
86.
StainbackK.Tomaskovic-DeveyD.SkaggsS. (2010) Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power and environments. Annual Review of Sociology36: 225–247.
87.
SteehC.KrysanM. (1996) The polls: Trends in affirmative action and the public, 1970–1995. The Public Opinion Quarterly60(1): 128–158.
88.
TaylorC. (2010) Occupational sex composition and the gendered availability of workplace support. Gender & Society24(2): 189–212.
89.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (1993) Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
90.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD.StainbackK. (2007) Discrimination and desegregation: Equal opportunity progress in U.S. private sector workplaces since the Civil Rights Act. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science609: 49–84.
91.
TorchiaM.CalabroA.HuseM. (2011) Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics102: 299–317.
92.
UmbachP. D.KuhG. D. (2006) Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness. Journal of Higher Education77: 169–192.
93.
WaddockS. (2003) Myths and realities of social investing. Organization and Environment16: 369–380.
94.
WallsJ.BerroneP.PhanP. (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link?Strategic Management Journal33: 71–115.
95.
WestphalJ. D. (1999) Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal42: 7–24.
WilsonG. (2009) Downward mobility of women from white-collar employment: Determinants and timing by race. Sociological Forum24(2): 382–401.
98.
WilsonG.RoscignoV.HuffmanM. (2012) Public sector transformation, racial inequality and downward occupational mobility. Social Forces91(3): 975–1006.
99.
WingfieldA. (2009) Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society23(1): 5–26.
100.
WingfieldA. (2013) No more invisible men: Race and gender in men’s work, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
101.
ZweigenhaftR. L.DomhoffG. W. (2011) The new CEOs: Women, African American, Latino and Asian American leaders of Fortune 500 companies, New York, NY: Rowan and Littlefield.
