Structural health monitoring (SHM) systems (SHMSs) have been extensively installed on bridge structures to guarantee their safety and functionality during their service life. These SHMS collected various types of data, based on which structural characteristics could be extracted for bridge condition assessment and/or damage detection. Though vibration-based dynamic characteristics are the most popular family, static characteristics have attracted increasing attention in recent years. This article, dedicated to bridge influence lines (ILs), one of the representative bridge static characteristics, attempts to provide the first state-of-the-art review of IL-related issues in bridge engineering, from IL identification to applications. The concept and analysis indices of IL are first introduced, along with the detailed merits of IL-related methods. Subsequently, the bridge IL sensing technologies are presented and divided into single-point, multiple-point, and distributed sensing. With distributed strain and displacement sensing, constructing the recently emerged special influences surface based on multiple ILs becomes technically viable. Various types of IL identification algorithms were reviewed. The least square method does not consider the noise and dynamic disturbances; the regularization method minimizes the noise effect during the identification process; the basis function method is claimed to be able to eliminate the noise and dynamic effects. These IL identification methods show their own pros and cons. Then, the IL-related applications are summarized, especially for damage detection and bridge weight-in-motion, considering diverse IL types. Finally, the current challenges and potential future research directions of IL-related issues are discussed. This study should be marked as the first comprehensive review of bridge ILs.
AktanAEFarheyDNBrownDL, et al. Condition assessment for bridge management. J Infrastruct Syst1996; 2: 108–117.
2.
SunLShangZXiaY, et al. Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: from condition assessment to damage detection. J Struct Eng2020; 146: 04020073.
3.
JangSJoHChoS, et al. Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation. Smart Struct Syst2010; 6: 439–459.
4.
LiHOuJ.The state of the art in structural health monitoring of cable-stayed bridges. J Civ Struct Health Monit2016; 6: 43–67.
5.
SeoJHuJWLeeJ.Summary review of structural health monitoring applications for highway bridges. J Perform Constr Facil2016; 30: 04015072.
6.
MousaMAYussofMMUdiUJ, et al. Application of digital image correlation in structural health monitoring of bridge infrastructures: a review. Infrastructures2021; 6: 176.
7.
HeZLiWSalehiH, et al. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Autom Constr2022; 136: 104168.
8.
WangHTaoTLiA, et al. Structural health monitoring system for Sutong cable-stayed bridge. Smart Struct Syst2016; 18: 317–134.
9.
AndersenEPedersenL.Structural monitoring of the great belt east bridge. Stra Cross1994; 94: 189–195.
10.
CawleyPAdamsRD.The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal Eng Des1979; 14: 49–57.
11.
PandeyABiswasMSammanM.Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib1991; 145: 321–332.
12.
LiuXLievenNEscamilla-AmbrosioPJ.Frequency response function shape-based methods for structural damage localisation. Mech Syst Signal Process2009; 23: 1243–1259.
13.
DoeblingSWFarrarCRPrimeMB, et al. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1996.
14.
FanWQiaoP.Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit2011; 10: 83–111.
15.
ChenZ-WZhuSXuY-L, et al. Damage detection in long suspension bridges using stress influence lines. Journal of Bridge Engineering2015; 20: 05014013.
16.
HeW-YZhuS.Moving load-induced response of damaged beam and its application in damage localization. J Vib Control2016; 22: 3601–3617.
17.
ZhaoLShentonIII HW. Structural damage detection using best approximated dead load redistribution. Struct Health Monit2005; 4: 319–339.
18.
HuaXNiYChenZ, et al. Structural damage detection of cable-stayed bridges using changes in cable forces and model updating. J Struct Eng2009; 135: 1093–1106.
19.
TurerAEmin AktanA.Issues in superload crossing of three steel stringer bridges in Toledo, Ohio. Transp Res Rec1999; 1688: 87–96.
20.
CaiQLChenZWZhuS, et al. On damage detection of beam structures using multiple types of influence lines. Structures2022; 449–465.
21.
ZhengXYangD-HYiT-H, et al. Development of bridge influence line identification methods based on direct measurement data: a comprehensive review and comparison. Eng Struct2019; 198: 109539.
22.
ZhengXYiT-HYangD-H, et al. Bridge evaluation based on identified influence lines and influence surfaces: multiple-scenario application. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2023; 23: 2340026.
23.
CaiQChenZZhuS.Experimental study of influence line–based damage localization for long-span cable suspension bridges. J Bridge Eng2023; 28: 04022151.
24.
OjioTYamadaK. Bridge weigh-in-motion systems using stringers of plate girder bridges. In: Third international conference on weigh-in-motion (ICWIM3), Iowa State University, Ames, 2002, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107243751 (accessed 18 July 2025).
25.
LinkMWeilandM.Damage identification by multi-model updating in the modal and in the time domain. Mech Syst Signal Process2009; 23: 1734–1746.
26.
ChenZWCaiQLZhuS.Damage quantification of beam structures using deflection influence lines. Struct Control Health Monit2018; 25: e2242.
27.
LiJZhaoX.A super-element approach for structural identification in time domain. Front Mech Eng China2006; 1: 215–221.
28.
MosesF.Weigh-in-motion system using instrumented bridges. Transp Eng J ASCE1979; 105: 233–249.
29.
HeWYRenWXZhuS.Damage detection of beam structures using quasi-static moving load induced displacement response. Eng Struct2017; 145: 70–82.
WongKYManKLChanWYK. Application of global positioning system to structural health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. Health Monit Manag Civ Infrastruct Syst2001; 4337: 390–401.
34.
SumitoroSMatsuiYKonoM, et al. Long span bridge health monitoring system in Japan. Health Monit Manag Civ Infrastruct Syst2001; 4337: 517–524.
35.
XuYLXiaY. Structural health monitoring of long-span suspension bridges. London: CRC Press, 2011.
36.
O’BrienEJQuilliganMKaroumiR. Calculating an influence line from direct measurements. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-bridge engineering. 2006, p. 31–34. Thomas Telford Ltd, http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4046 (accessed 18 July 2025).
37.
RajeevPKodikaraJChiuWK, et al. Distributed optical fibre sensors and their applications in pipeline monitoring. Key Eng Mater2013; 558: 424–434.
38.
MinardoAPorcaroGGiannettaD, et al. Real-time monitoring of railway traffic using slope-assisted Brillouin distributed sensors. Appl Opt2013; 52: 3770–3776.
39.
RichardsWParkerJr ARKoWL, et al. Application of fiber optic instrumentation (Validation des systemes d’instrumentation a fibres optiques). Nato Research and Technology Organization Neuilly-Sur-Seine (France), 2012, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17232591 (accessed 18 July 2025).
40.
MinardoAPersichettiGTestaG, et al. Long term structural health monitoring by Brillouin fibre-optic sensing: a real case. J Geophys Eng2012; 9: S64–S69.
41.
ZhangSLiuY.Damage detection in beam bridges using quasi-static displacement influence lines. Appl Sci2019; 9: 1805.
42.
CaiQZhuS.Optical frequency domain reflectometry sensing for damage detection in long-span bridges using influence surface. Struct Health Monit2023; 22: 3465–3480.
43.
ZhangGWuYZhaoW, et al. Radar-based multipoint displacement measurements of a 1200-m-long suspension bridge. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens2020; 167: 71–84.
44.
LuoLFengMQWuZY.Robust vision sensor for multi-point displacement monitoring of bridges in the field. Eng Struct2018; 163: 255–266.
45.
FukudaYFengMQNaritaY, et al. Vision-based displacement sensor for monitoring dynamic response using robust object search algorithm. IEEE Sens J2013; 13: 4725–4732.
GeLKooKYWangM, et al. Bridge damage detection using precise vision-based displacement influence lines and weigh-in-motion devices: experimental validation. Eng Struct2023; 288: 116185.
48.
JianXXiaYSunS, et al. Integrating bridge influence surface and computer vision for bridge weigh-in-motion in complicated traffic scenarios. Struct Control Health Monit2022; 29: e3066.
49.
DongCZCatbasFN.A review of computer vision–based structural health monitoring at local and global levels. Struct Health Monit2021; 20: 692–743.
50.
PieracciniMMiccinesiLAbdorazzagh NejadA, et al. Experimental dynamic impact factor assessment of railway bridges through a radar interferometer. Remote Sens2019; 11: 2207.
51.
LuziGCrosettoMCuevas-GonzálezM.A radar-based monitoring of the Collserola tower (Barcelona). Mech Syst Signal Process2014; 49: 234–248.
52.
RiceJAGuCLiC, et al. A radar-based sensor network for bridge displacement measurements. In: Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems 2012. SPIE, 2012, vol. 8345, pp. 157–166.
53.
HuseynovFKimCO’BrienEJ, et al. Bridge damage detection using rotation measurements–experimental validation. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 135, 106380.
54.
HuseynovFHesterDObrienEJ, et al. Monitoring the condition of narrow bridges using data from rotation-based and strain-based bridge weigh-in-motion systems. J Bridge Eng2022; 27: 04022050.
55.
ZaurinRCatbasF.Integration of computer imaging and sensor data for structural health monitoring of bridges. Smart Mater Struct2009; 19: 015019.
56.
ZaurinRKhucTCatbasFN.Hybrid sensor-camera monitoring for damage detection: case study of a real bridge. J Bridge Eng2016; 21: 05016002.
57.
DongC-ZBasSCatbasFN.A completely non-contact recognition system for bridge unit influence line using portable cameras and computer vision. Smart Struct Syst2019; 24: 617–630.
58.
KhucTCatbasFN.Structural identification using computer vision–based bridge health monitoring. J Struct Eng2018; 144: 04017202.
59.
ChenZWCaiQLLiJ.Stress influence line identification of long suspension bridges installed with structural health monitoring systems. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2016; 16: 1640023.
60.
ChenZYangWLiJ, et al. Bridge influence line identification based on adaptive B-spline basis dictionary and sparse regularization. Struct Control Health Monit2019; 26: e2355.
61.
GonzálezADowlingJO’BrienEJ, et al. Testing of a bridge weigh-in-motion algorithm utilising multiple longitudinal sensor locations. J Test Eval2012; 40: 961–974.
62.
ZhangCZhuJShiT, et al. Influence line estimation of bridge based on elastic net and vehicle-induced response. Measurement2022; 202: 111883.
63.
ZhengXYangDHYiTH, et al. Bridge influence line identification from structural dynamic responses induced by a high-speed vehicle. Struct Control Health Monit2020; 27: e2544.
64.
ZhengXYangD-HYiT-H, et al. Bridge influence line identification based on regularized least-squares QR decomposition method. J Bridge Eng2019; 24: 06019004.
65.
ZhengXYangDHYiTH, et al. Bridge influence surface identification method considering the spatial effect of vehicle load. Struct Control Health Monit2021; 28: e2769.
WangN-BHeL-XRenW-X, et al. Extraction of influence line through a fitting method from bridge dynamic response induced by a passing vehicle. Eng Struct2017; 151: 648–664.
68.
WangN-BWangCZhouH, et al. A novel extraction method for the actual influence line of bridge structures. J Sound Vib2023; 553: 117605.
69.
FrøsethGTRønnquistACanteroD, et al. Influence line extraction by deconvolution in the frequency domain. Comput Struct2017; 189: 21–30.
70.
YanW-JYuenK-V.A new probabilistic frequency-domain approach for influence line extraction from static transmissibility measurements under unknown moving loads. Eng Struct2020; 216: 110625.
71.
MustafaSYoshidaISekiyaH.An investigation of bridge influence line identification using time-domain and frequency-domain methods. Structures2021; 33(3): 2061–2065.
QuqaSLandiLDiotalleviPP.Automatic identification of dense damage-sensitive features in civil infrastructure using sparse sensor networks. Autom Constr2021; 128: 103740.
74.
ZhouYZhouSHaoG, et al. Bridge influence line identification based on big data and interval analysis with affine arithmetic. Measurement2021; 183: 109807.
75.
MartiniATronciEMFengMQ, et al. A computer vision-based method for bridge model updating using displacement influence lines. Eng Struct2022; 259: 114129.
76.
IengS-S.Bridge influence line estimation for bridge weigh-in-motion system. J Comput Civ Eng2015; 29: 06014006.
77.
ChenZ-WYangWJunL, et al. A systematic method from influence line identification to damage detection: application to RC bridges. Comput Concrete2017; 20: 563–572.
78.
ChenZWZhaoLYanWJ, et al. A statistical influence line identification method using Bayesian regularization and a polynomial interpolating function. Struct Control Health Monit2022; 29: e3080.
79.
WeiYTYangDHYiTH, et al. Bridge static influence line identification based on structural dynamic responses under high-speed trains. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2023; 23: 2350126.
80.
ZhengHWYiTHZhengX, et al. Operational influence line identification of high-speed railway bridge considering uncertainty of train load. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A Civ Eng2024; 10(4): 04024052.
81.
ChenZGuoZRenW, et al. A novel bridge influence line identification approach based on nonlinear frequency modulation signal reconstruction. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 219: 111622.
82.
MuHQPengZHWangH, et al. Structural influence line identification: Inverse problem identifiability analysis and reduced-dimension Bayesian uncertainty quantification. Eng Mech2023; 40: 51–62 (in Chinese).
83.
DengLWuHHeW, et al. Genuine influence line and influence surface identification from measured bridge response considering vehicular wheel loads. J Bridge Eng2023; 28: 04022145.
84.
ZhuQChenJZhangQ, et al. A non-contact recognition for deflection influence line of footbridge based on computer vision. Eng Mech2021; 38: 145–153 (in Chinese).
85.
ŽnidaričAKalinJ.Using bridge weigh-in-motion systems to monitor single-span bridge influence lines. J Civ Struct Health Monit2020; 10: 743–756.
YangKDingYZhaoH, et al. Quasi-static influence line identification and damage identification of equal-span bridges based on measured vehicle-induced deflection. Balt J Road Bridge Eng2022; 17: 47–74.
88.
ZaurinRNecati CatbasF.Structural health monitoring using video stream, influence lines, and statistical analysis. Struct Health Monit2011; 10: 309–332.
89.
WuBWuGYangC, et al. Damage identification and bearing capacity evaluation of bridges based on distributed long-gauge strain envelope line under moving vehicle loads. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2016; 27: 2344–2358.
90.
WuBWuGYangC, et al. Damage identification method for continuous girder bridges based on spatially-distributed long-gauge strain sensing under moving loads. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 104: 415–435.
91.
WuBWuGYangC.Parametric study of a rapid bridge assessment method using distributed macro-strain influence envelope line. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 120: 642–663.
92.
MustafaSSekiyaHHiranoS.Evaluation of fatigue damage in steel girder bridges using displacement influence lines. Structures2023; 53: 1160–1171.
93.
LiuCTengJPengZ.Optimal sensor placement for bridge damage detection using deflection influence line. Smart Struct Syst2020; 25: 169–181.
94.
HuangY-hZhuC-jYeY-s, et al. Damage detection of arch structure by using deflection influence line. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on sustainable energy, environment and information engineering, Thailand, https://doi.org/10.12783/DTEEES/SEEIE2016/4500 (accessed 18 July 2025).
95.
DuYLiuYWangX.Damage identification of simply-supported beam bridges based on influence line curvature of deflection differential values. Bridge Constr2009; 31: 80–83 (in Chinese).
96.
WangCYHuangCKChenCS.Damage assessment of beam by a quasi-static moving vehicular load. Adv Adapt Data Anal2011; 3: 417–445.
97.
HesterDBrownjohnJHuseynovF, et al. Identifying damage in a bridge by analysing rotation response to a moving load. Struct Infrastruct Eng2020; 16(7): 1050–1065.
98.
ZhouYDiSXiangC, et al. Damage identification in simply supported bridge based on rotational-angle influence lines method. Trans Tianjin Univ2018; 24: 587–601 (in Chinese).
99.
ZhouYDiSKXiangCS, et al. Beam structure damage detection based on rotational-angle-influence-lines of elastic-constrained-support beam. Trans Tianjin Univ2020; 24: 587–601 (in Chinese).
100.
ChengQRuanXWangY, et al. Serious damage localization of continuous girder bridge by support reaction influence lines. Buildings2022; 12: 182.
101.
RenYOBrienEJCanteroD, et al. Railway bridge condition monitoring using numerically calculated responses from batches of trains. Appl Sci2022; 12: 4972.
102.
ChenZWZhaoLZhangJ, et al. Damage quantification of beam structures using deflection influence line changes and sparse regularization. Adv Struct Eng2021; 24: 1997–2010.
103.
WangMShiYWangY.Equivalent constitutive model of steel with cumulative degradation and damage. J Constr Steel Res2012; 79: 101–114.
104.
QiangBLiuXLiuY, et al. Experimental study and parameter determination of cyclic constitutive model for bridge steels. J Constr Steel Res2021; 183: 106738.
105.
XuLYuZShanZ.Numerical simulation for train–track–bridge dynamic interaction considering damage constitutive relation of concrete tracks. Arch Civ Mech Eng2021; 21: 1–23.
106.
SunSSunLChenL.Damage detection based on structural responses induced by traffic load: methodology and application. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2016; 16: 1640026.
107.
AlamdariMMKildashtiKSamaliB, et al. Damage diagnosis in bridge structures using rotation influence line: validation on a cable-stayed bridge. Eng Struct2019; 185: 1–14.
108.
AlamdariMMGeLKildashtiK, et al. Non-contact structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge: case study. Struct Infrastruct Eng2019; 15: 1119–1136.
109.
ZhuSChenZCaiQ, et al. Locate damage in long-span bridges based on stress influence lines and information fusion technique. Adv Struct Eng2014; 17: 1089–1102.
110.
YinXYanWLuoZ, et al. Structural damage localization based on deflection influence surfaces calculated by the three-dimensional boundary face method. Measurement2024; 236: 115077.
111.
ZnidaricABaumgartnerW. Bridge weigh-in-motion systems-an overview. In: Second European conference on weigh-in-motion of road vehicles, Lisbon, Portugal, 14–16 September 1998, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107832228 (accessed 18 July 2025).
112.
McNultyPO’BrienEJ. Testing of bridge weigh-in-motion system in a sub-Arctic climate. J Test Eval2003; 31: 497–506.
LydonMTaylorSERobinsonD, et al. Recent developments in bridge weigh in motion (B-WIM). J Civil Struct Health Monit2016; 6: 69–81.
115.
O’BrienEJRowleyCWGonzalezA, et al. A regularised solution to the bridge weigh-in-motion equations. Int J Heavy Veh Syst2009; 16: 310–327.
116.
ŽnidaričAKalinJKreslinM.Improved accuracy and robustness of bridge weigh-in-motion systems. Struct Infrastruct Eng2018; 14: 412–424.
117.
CardiniADeWolfJT.Implementation of a long-term bridge weigh-in-motion system for a steel girder bridge in the interstate highway system. J Bridge Eng2009; 14: 418–423.
118.
ZhaoHUddinNShaoX, et al. Field-calibrated influence lines for improved axle weight identification with a bridge weigh-in-motion system. Struct Infrastruct Eng2015; 11: 721–743.
119.
HuseynovFFidlerPBravo HaroM, et al. Setting up a real-time train load monitoring system in the UK using Bridge Weigh-In Motion technology–a case study. In: 11th International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent Infrastructure, Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–12 August 2023.
120.
ZhangLChengXWuG.A bridge weigh-in-motion method of motorway bridges considering random traffic flow based on long-gauge fibre Bragg grating sensors. Measurement2021; 186: 110081.
O’BrienEJZhangLZhaoH, et al. Probabilistic bridge weigh-in-motion. Can J Civ Eng2018; 45: 667–675.
123.
O’BrienEJBrownjohnJHesterD, et al. Identifying damage on a bridge using rotation-based bridge weigh-in-motion. J Civ Struct Health Monit2021; 11: 175–188.
124.
SekiyaHKubotaKMikiC.Simplified portable bridge weigh-in-motion system using accelerometers. J Bridge Eng2018; 23: 04017124.
125.
SekiyaH.Field verification over one year of a portable bridge weigh-in-motion system for steel bridges. J Bridge Eng2019; 24: 04019063.
126.
ThillainathSHoodR. An improved method of CULWAY calibration. In: Australian road research board (ARRB) conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, 1990, http://arrbknowledge.com (accessed 18 July 2025).
127.
JianXXiaYLozano-GalantJA, et al. Traffic sensing methodology combining influence line theory and computer vision techniques for girder bridges. J Sens2019; 2019: 1–15.
128.
QuilliganM.Bridge weigh-in motion: development of a 2-D multi-vehicle algorithm. Byggvetenskap. Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology, 2003.
129.
WangNBZhouYZhouD.A calculation method for moving vehicle induced bridge dynamics amplification factor based on influence line. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol2020; 51(7): 1854–1861 (in Chinese).
130.
YangDHGuanZXYiTH, et al. Fatigue evaluation of bridges based on strain influence line loaded by elaborate stochastic traffic flow. J Bridge Eng2022; 27: 04022082.
131.
LiaoJTangGMengL, et al. Finite element model updating based on field quasi-static generalized influence line and its bridge engineering application. Procedia Eng2012; 31: 348–353.
132.
XiaoXXuYLZhuQ.Multiscale modeling and model updating of a cable-stayed bridge. II: model updating using modal frequencies and influence lines. J Bridge Eng2015; 20: 04014113.
133.
ZhaoHTanCOBrienEJ, et al. Developing digital twins to characterize bridge behavior using measurements taken under random traffic. J Bridge Eng2022; 27: 04021101.
134.
WangNBShenWGuoC, et al. Moving load test-based rapid bridge capacity evaluation through actual influence line. Eng Struct2022; 252: 113630.
135.
RytterA. Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. Aalborg, Denmark: Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, University of Aalborg, 1993.
136.
LiuYWangXZhouFX.Study on damage identification of the simply supported beam employ the difference of deflection influence line under symmetrically load. Appl Mech Mater2012; 166: 1254–1257.
137.
SunKZhangYQ.Analysis of displacement influence line characteristics of simply supported beam with local damage. Adv Mater Res2014; 919: 364–368.
138.
WangNB.Baseline-free damage detection method for beam structures based on an actual influence line. Smart Struct Syst2019; 24: 475–490.
139.
WangNZuoQLiJ, et al. Damage detection method for statically indeterminate bridge based on multi-influence line information in current state. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol2021; 52: 3284–3294 (in Chinese).
140.
HeitnerBSchoefsFOBrienEJ, et al. Using the unit influence line of a bridge to track changes in its condition. J Civ Struct Health Monit2020; 10: 667–678.
141.
WangSHuseynovFCaseroM, et al. A novel bridge damage detection method based on the equivalent influence lines–theoretical basis and field validation. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 204: 110738.
142.
ZhengXYiT-HYangD-H, et al. Stiffness estimation of girder bridges using influence lines identified from vehicle-induced structural responses. J Eng Mech2021; 147: 04021042.
143.
FanCZhengYWangB, et al. Damage identification method for tied arch bridge suspender based on quasi-static displacement influence line. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 200: 110518.
144.
ZhouYLiMShiY, et al. Damage identification method of tied-arch bridges based on the equivalent thrust-influenced line. Struct Control Health Monit2024; 2024: 6896975.
145.
ChenDZhangYLiZ, et al. Damage-identification method for bridge structures based on displacement influence line and wavelet packet analysis. J Perform Constr Facil2023; 37: 04023047.
146.
ChenDZhangLLiZ, et al. Identifying damage in long-span self-anchored suspension bridges using characteristic indices. Structures2024; 62: 106177.
147.
ZhangCZhuJZhouS.Integration of multi-point influence line information for damage localization of bridge structures. J Civ Struct Health Monit2024; 14: 449–463.
148.
GaoQDongYWangT, et al. Experimental investigation of a rapid calculation and damage diagnosis of the quasistatic influence line of a self-anchored suspension bridge based on deflection theory. ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Eng Sys Part B Mech Eng2024; 10: 1–29.
149.
ZeinaliYStoryBA.Impairment localization and quantification using noisy static deformation influence lines and Iterative Multi-parameter Tikhonov Regularization. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 109: 399–419.
150.
BreccolottiMNatalicchiM.Bridge damage detection through combined quasi-static influence lines and weigh-in-motion devices. Int J Civ Eng2022; 20: 487–500.
151.
TanDLuZLiuJ.A two-step method for damage identification in beam structures based on influence line difference and acceleration data. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10: 1687814018787404.
152.
ZhangYXieQLiG, et al. Multi-damage identification of multi-span bridges based on influence lines. Coatings2021; 11(8): 905.
153.
CanteroDKaroumiRGonzálezA.The virtual axle concept for detection of localised damage using Bridge Weigh-in-Motion data. Eng Struct2015; 89: 26–36.
154.
LiuYZhangS.Damage localization of beam bridges using quasi-static strain influence lines based on the BOTDA technique. Sensors2018; 18: 4446.
155.
WangYLiuX.Damage localization method using vertical support reaction data for real-world continuous bridge. Sustain Dev Crit Infrastruct2014: 447–454.
156.
HeWLiuJSongS, et al. A non-contact vehicle weighing approach based on bridge weigh-in-motion framework and computer vision techniques. Measurement2024; 225: 113994.
157.
XuW.Vehicle load identification using machine vision and displacement influence lines. Buildings2024; 14: 392.
158.
WangN-BRenW-XLiM.Moving load identification of a bridge based on influence line. J Vib Shock2013; 32: 129–133 (in Chinese).
159.
YangJHouPYangC, et al. Study on the method of moving load identification based on strain influence line. Appl Sci2021; 11: 853.
160.
AsnachindaPPinkaewT.Vehicle axle load identification using extracted bridge influence line via updated static component technique. Eng J2021; 25: 45–60.
161.
WangYQuW-L.Moving train loads identification on a continuous steel truss girder by using dynamic displacement influence line method. Int J Steel Struct2011; 11: 109–115.
162.
HeWYLiZZhouL, et al. The effect of environmental temperature on influence line of concrete beam type bridge. Structures2023; 48: 1468–1478.
163.
StraussAWendnerRFrangopolDM, et al. Influence line-model correction approach for the assessment of engineering structures using novel monitoring techniques. Smart Struct Syst2012; 9: 1–20.
164.
ZhuQXuYLXiaoX.Multiscale modeling and model updating of a cable-stayed bridge. I: modeling and influence line analysis. J Bridge Eng2015; 20: 04014112.
165.
LinSWDuYLYiTH, et al. Model updating using bridge influence lines based on an adaptive metamodel global optimization method. J Bridge Eng2022; 27: 04022003.
166.
LinS-WDuY-LYiT-H, et al. Influence lines-based model updating of suspension bridges considering boundary conditions. Adv Struct Eng2023; 26: 316–328.
167.
ZhouYGangYDiS, et al. Bridge model modification experiment based on strain influence line. J Zhejiang Univ Eng Sci2024; 58(3): 537–546 (in Chinese).
168.
DanDKongZ.Bridge vehicle-induced effect influence line characteristic function based on monitoring big data: definition and identification. Struct Health Monit2023; 22: 2987–3005.
169.
ŠtimacGI.Influence of sampling interval on deflection-influence-line-based damage detection in beams. J Appng Sci2014; 12: 69–74.
