Finite element modeling of a full-scale five-girder bridge for structural health monitoring

Abstract

Finite element modeling is commonly used to simulate the effect of damage on in-service bridges to facilitate the study of vibration-based damage detection techniques. This study describes the field testing and finite element modeling of an in situ, full-scale, five-girder bridge that is subjected to controlled levels of known damage. The focus of the study is finite element (FE) model calibration to enable the study of damage scenarios including those not imposed during the field tests. Modal parameters are extracted from triaxial vibration records obtained over a relatively dense measurement grid using inexpensive geophones and are used to calibrate a three-dimensional FE model of the bridge. The calibration process and considerations that should be made during field tests for proper model calibration are discussed. Various vibration-based damage detection techniques are evaluated based on their ability to locate the simulated damage. Results show that most of the damage detection techniques evaluated are capable of successfully locating the induced damage on a global level. It is observed from the present study that the horizontal vibration response of the bridge is particularly sensitive to the simulated damage. It is recommended that efforts be made to measure a bridge’s horizontal vibration response (in addition to vertical vibration records) during field tests and this information be included in the FE model calibration processes.

Keywords

bridge finite element structural health monitoring damage detection vibrations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Bridging the gap: restoring and rebuilding the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: AASHO, 2008.

Federal Highway Administration. ‘Deficient Bridges by State and Highway System’, Washington, D.C. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/deficient.htm (consulted October 2009).

Federal Highway Administration. Reliability of visual inspection. Rep. No. FHWA-RD-01-020, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Doebling SW , Farrar CR , Prime MB and Shevitz DW Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Rep. No. LA13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M., 1996.

Doebling SW , Farrar CR and Prime MB A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vibr Dig 1998; 30(2): 91-105.

Sohn H. , Farrar CR , Hemez FM , Shunk DD , Stinemates DW and Nadler BR A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001. Rep. No. LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M., 2004.

Ragland WS Structural health monitoring and damage evaluation of full-scale bridges using triaxial geophones: controlled in-situ experiments and finite element modeling . PhD dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 2009.

Dobrin MB and Savit CH Introduction to geophysical prospecting, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.

Robinson ES and Coruh C. Basic exploration geophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988.

10.

Lauzon RG and DeWolf JT Ambient vibration monitoring of a highway bridge undergoing a destructive test. J Bridge Eng 2006; 11(5): 602-610.

11.

Zhou Z. , Wegner LD and Sparling BF Vibration-based detection of small-scale damage on a bridge deck. J Struct Eng 2007; 133(9): 1257-1267.

12.

Richardson MH and Formenti DL Parameter estimation from frequency response measurements using rational fraction polynomials. Structural Measurement Systems Technical Note 85-3, 1985.

13.

Farrar CR , Doebling SW , Prime MB , et al. A comprehensive monitoring system for damage identification and location in large structural and mechanical systems. Rep. No. LA-UR-98-233, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1998.

14.

The Mathworks, Inc. MATLAB, Version R2007 a. Natick, MA: The Mathworks Inc, 2007.

15.

Schwarz B. and Richardson M. Modal parameter estimation from ambient response data. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Modal Analysis Conference , Kissimmee, FL, 2001, pp. 1017-1022.

16.

Morassi A. and Tonon S. Dynamic testing for structural identification of a bridge. J Bridge Eng 2008; 13(6): 573-585.

17.

Ren WX , Zhao T. and Harik IE Experimental and analytical modal analysis of a steel arch bridge. J Struct Eng 2004; 130(7): 1022-1031.

18.

Bozdag E. , Sunbuloglu E. and Ersoy H. Vibration analysis of new Galata Bridge-experimental and numerical results . Comput Struct 2006; 84: 283-292.

19.

Ren WX and Peng XL Baseline finite element modeling of a large span cable-stayed bridge through field ambient vibration tests. Comput Struct 2005; 83: 536-550.

20.

Cheng J. , Jiang JJ , Xiao RC and Xiang HF Ultimate load carrying capacity of the Lu Pu steel arch bridge under static wind loads. Comput Struct 2003; 81: 61-73.

21.

Koh BH and Dyke SJ Structural health monitoring for flexible bridge structures using correlation and sensitivity of modal data. Comput Struct 2007; 85: 117-130.

22.

Siddique AB , Sparling BF and Wegner LD Assessment of vibration-based damage detection for an integral abutment bridge. Can J Civil Eng 2007; 34(3): 438-452.

23.

Dassault Systèmes, Inc. , SIMULIA Corp. ABAQUS, Version 6.8. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes, Inc, 2008.

24.

American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary (ACI 318 R-08). Farmington Hills , MI: American Concrete Institute, 2008.

25.

Ewins DJ Modal testing: theory and practice. New York: John Wiley, 1985.

26.

Farrar CR and Jauregui DA Damage detection algorithms applied to experimental and numerical modal data from the I-40 bridge. Rep. No. LA-13074-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M., 1996.

27.

Stubbs N. , Kim YI and Farrar CR Field verification of a nondestructive damage localization and severity estimation algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Bethel, CT, 1995, pp. 210-218.

28.

Pandey AK , Biswas M. and Samman MM Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vibr 1991; 145(2): 321-332.

29.

Pandey AK and Biswas M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. J Sound Vibr 1994; 169(1): 3-17.

30.

Zhang Z. and Aktan AE The damage indices for the constructed facilities. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Bethel, CT, 1995, pp. 1520-1529.