Damage monitoring is an essential step to understand fatigue damage growth in composite wind turbine blades and for reliable lifetime prediction. The current study is an experimental investigation of fatigue delamination induced by an intentionally embedded defect in the spar cap of a 31 m wind turbine blade. A constant cyclic flap-wise bending was applied to the blade for 320,000 cycles. Delamination growth is identified and measured by visual inspection, acoustic emission (AE), and infrared thermography of the blade surface. It was observed that the area of delaminated regions grew faster during the early cycles, then their growth rates decreased, and the interlayer cracks reached stable growth. The experiment shows fatigue delamination develops gradually in the spar cap and allows monitoring of the damage before reaching a critical stage. The ability of AE and thermography methods to detect subsurface damage is demonstrated by the identification of steady delamination growth during cyclic load. Damage localization by both methods is in good agreement with the delamination location. Most acoustic activities are spotted in the boundaries of delaminated regions, and the position of a significant number of acoustic activities with the highest energy content correlates with the location of delamination crack fronts. It is shown that the surface temperature distribution contour indicates the shape of the largest delaminated region, and the growth of the hot region area correlates with damage propagation. However, multiple delaminations through the thickness cannot be discriminated from the thermal images.
MandellJFSamborskyDDCairnsD. Fatigue of Composite Materials and Substructures for Wind Turbine Blades. Albuquerque, NM; Livermore, CA, USA; Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM); Sandia National Lab (SNL-CA), 2002, https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/793410/ (accessed 12 March 2023).
2.
AgastraPMandellJ. Testing and simulation of damage growth at ply drops in wind turbine blade laminates. In: Proceedings of society for the advancement of material and process engineering (SAMPE). SAMPE, Seattle, United States, 17–20 May 2010, p. 398.
3.
ChenXEderMA. A critical review of damage and failure of composite wind turbine blade structures. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 942(1): 12001.
4.
AvdelidisNPGanTH. Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of composites: infrared (IR) thermography of wind turbine blades. In: Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of polymer matrix composites: techniques and applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2013, pp. 634–648.
5.
McGuganMMishnaevskyL. Damage mechanism based approach to the structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. Coatings2020; 10(12): 1–23.
6.
MeinlschmidtPAderholdJ. Thermographic inspection of rotor blades. In: The 9th European conference on non-destructive testing (ECNDT), Berlin, Germany, September 2006, pp. 1–9.
7.
SzwedoMHellsteinP. Qualitative diagnostics of wind-turbine blades inspection using active thermography. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on quantitative infrared thermography. QIRT Council, Bordeaux, France, 7–11 July 2014.
8.
ManoharAdi ScaleaFL. Detection of defects in wind turbine composite blades using statistically enhanced lock-in thermography. Struct Health Monit2013; 12(5–6): 566–574.
9.
YangRHeYMandelisA, et al. Induction infrared thermography and thermal-wave-radar analysis for imaging inspection and diagnosis of blade composites. IEEE Trans Industr Inform2018; 14(12): 5637–5647.
10.
GiorgiMDeNobileRSaponaroA. Numerical and experimental validation of SMArt thermography for the inspection of wind blade composite laminate. SN Appl Sci2020; 2: 1–9.
11.
SanatiHWoodDSunQ. Condition monitoring of wind turbine blades using active and passive thermography. Appl Sci2018; 8(10): 2004.
12.
AvdelidisNPIbarra-CastanedoCMaldagueXPV. Infrared thermography inspection of glass reinforced plastic (GRP) wind turbine blades and the concept of an automated scanning device. In: Thermosense: thermal infrared applications XXXV, 87050G. SPIE, Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 4 June 2013, pp. 87050G1–6.
13.
ZhangXYZhouBLiH, et al. Depth detection of spar cap defects in large-scale wind turbine blades based on a 3D heat conduction model using step heating infrared thermography. Meas Sci Technol2022; 33(5): 055008.
14.
DoroshtnasirMWorzewskiTKrankenhagenR, et al. On-site inspection of potential defects in wind turbine rotor blades with thermography. Wind Energy2016; 19(8): 1407–1422.
15.
LizaranzuMLarioAChiminelliA, et al. Non-destructive testing of composite materials by means of active thermography-based tools. Infrared Phys Technol2015; 71: 113–120.
16.
GalleguillosCZorrillaAJimenezA, et al. Thermographic non-destructive inspection of wind turbine blades using unmanned aerial systems. Plast Rubber Compos2015; 44(3): 98–103.
17.
HwangSAnYKSohnH. Continuous line laser thermography for damage imaging of rotating wind turbine blades. Procedia Eng2017; 188: 225–232.
18.
HwangSAnYKYangJ, et al. Remote inspection of internal delamination in wind turbine blades using continuous line laser scanning thermography. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol2020; 7(3): 699–712.
19.
ChenXJaneliukstisRSarhadiA. Thermographic data analytics-based damage characterization in a large-scale composite structure under cyclic loading. Compos Struct2022; 290: 115525.
20.
ChenXShihavuddinASMMadsenSH, et al. AQUADA: automated quantification of damages in composite wind turbine blades for LCOE reduction. Wind Energy2021; 24(6): 535–548.
21.
NairACaiCS. Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: review and case studies. Eng Struct2010; 32(6): 1704–1714.
22.
ChenXWangSQiaoB, et al. Basic research on machinery fault diagnostics: past, present, and future trends. Front Mech Eng2018; 13(2): 264–291.
23.
HameedZHongYSChoYM, et al. Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2009; 13(1): 1–39.
24.
QiaoWLuD. A survey on wind turbine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis – part II: signals and signal processing methods. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(10): 6546–6557.
25.
García MárquezFPTobiasAMPérezJM, et al. Condition monitoring of wind turbines: techniques and methods. Renew Energy2012; 46: 169–178.
26.
ChenXSemenovSMcGuganM, et al. Fatigue testing of a 14.3 m composite blade embedded with artificial defects – damage growth and structural health monitoring. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2021; 140: 106189.
27.
XuDLiuPFChenZP. Damage mode identification and singular signal detection of composite wind turbine blade using acoustic emission. Compos Struct2021; 255: 112954.
28.
PapasalourosDTsopelasNAnastasopoulosA, et al. Acoustic emission monitoring of composite blade of NM48/750 NEG-MICON wind turbine. J Acoust Emiss2013; 31(1): 36–49.
29.
DuttonAGBlanchMJVionisP, et al. Acoustic emission condition monitoring of wind turbine rotor blades: laboratory certification testing to large scale in-service deployment. In: European wind energy conference-EWEC, Madrid, Spain, 16–19 June 2003.
30.
LiuPXuDLiJ, et al. Damage mode identification of composite wind turbine blade under accelerated fatigue loads using acoustic emission and machine learning. Struct Health Monit2019; 19(4): 1092–103.
31.
BeattieA. Acoustic emission monitoring of a wind turbine blade during a fatigue test. In: 35th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno, Nevada, United States, 6–10 January 1997, p. 958 (Aerospace Sciences Meetings).
32.
TangJSouaSMaresC, et al. An experimental study of acoustic emission methodology for in service condition monitoring of wind turbine blades. Renew Energy2016; 99: 170–179.
33.
JoossePABlanchMJDuttonAG, et al. Acoustic emission monitoring of small wind turbine blades. J Sol Energy Eng2002; 124(4): 446–454.
34.
DuttonAG. Thermoelastic stress measurement and acoustic emission monitoring in wind turbine blade testing. In: European wind energy conference-EWEC, London, UK, 22–25 November 2004.
35.
NiezreckiCAvitabilePChenJ, et al. Inspection and monitoring of wind turbine blade-embedded wave defects during fatigue testing. Struct Health Monit2014; 13(6): 629–643.
36.
Movahedi-RadAVKellerTVassilopoulosAP. Fatigue damage in angle-ply GFRP laminates under tension-tension fatigue. Int J Fatigue2018; 109: 60–69.
37.
AzhdariSFakhreddini-NajafabadiSTaheri-BehroozF. An experimental and numerical investigation on low velocity impact response of GLAREs. Compos Struct2021; 271: 114123.
38.
Movahedi-RadAVKellerTVassilopoulosAP. Stress ratio effect on tension-tension fatigue behavior of angle-ply GFRP laminates. Int J Fatigue2019; 126: 103–111.
39.
ShabaniPTaheri-BehroozFSamareh-MousaviSS, et al. Very high cycle and gigacycle fatigue of fiber-reinforced composites: a review on experimental approaches and fatigue damage mechanisms. Prog Mater Sci2021; 118: 100762.
40.
MandegarianSSamareh-MousaviSSTaheri-BehroozF. Experimental investigation on in-plane shear fatigue failure criteria of ± 45° angle-ply carbon epoxy composite. Int J Fatigue2022; 160: 106873.
41.
KatuninAWachlaD. Determination of fatigue limit of polymeric composites in fully reversed bending loading mode using self-heating effect. J Compos Mater2019; 53(1): 83–91.
42.
KatuninA. Criticality of the self-heating effect in polymers and polymer matrix composites during fatigue, and their application in non-destructive testing. Polymers (Basel)2018; 11(1): 19.
43.
SpearingSMEvansAG. The role of fiber bridging in the delamination resistance of fiber-reinforced composites. Acta Metall Et Mater1992; 40(9): 2191–2199.
