A numerical algorithm based on multiscale modeling is presented, to postprocess ground penetrating radar measurements obtained when inspecting a reinforced concrete slab, to characterize the position and shape of rebars. The method is based on minimizing the difference between the measured signal and the signal generated by a guessed location of the inclusion. Results for three specific examples are presented, including synthetic and real data. Comparison between inversion results and causative bodies is encouraging, despite the simplicity of the approach.
GiannakisIGiannopoulosAWarrenC.A machine learning based fast forward solver for ground penetrating radar with application to full waveform inversion. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens2019; 57: 4417–4426.
5.
MertensLPersicoRMateraL, et al. Automated detection of reflection hyperbolas in complex GPR images with no a priori knowledge on the medium. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens2016; 54: 580–596.
6.
QiaoLQinYRenX, et al. Identification of buried objects in GPR using amplitude modulated signals extracted from multiresolution monogenic signal analysis. Sensors2015; 15: 30340–30350.
7.
DinhKGucunskiNDuongT.Migration-based automated rebar picking for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground penetrating radar. NDT & E Int2018; 98: 45–54.
8.
JavadiMGhasemzadehH.Wavelet analysis for ground penetrating radar applications: a case study. J Geophys Eng2017; 14: 1189–1202.
9.
MorrisIKumarVGlisicB.Predicting material properties of concrete from ground-penetrating radar attributes. Struct Health Monit2021; 20: 2791–2812.
10.
KangMSKimNLeeJJ, et al. Deep learning-based automated underground cavity detection using three-dimensional ground penetrating radar. Struct Health Monit2020; 19: 173–185.
11.
LaiWW-LDérobertXAnnanP. A review of ground penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT & E Int2018; 96: 58–78.
12.
HouFRuiXFanX, et al. Review of GPR activities in civil infrastructures: data analysis and applications. Remote Sens2022; 14: 5972.
13.
WarrenC.Numerical modelling of high-frequency ground-penetrating radar antennas. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK, 2009.
14.
JazayeriSKruseSHasanI, et al. Reinforced concrete mapping using full-waveform inversion of GPR data. Constr Build Mat2019; 229: 117102.
15.
KalogeropoulosAKrukJHugenschmidtJ, et al. Chlorides and moisture assessment in concrete by GPR full waveform inversion. Near Surface Geophys2011; 9: 277–286.
16.
LiuTKlotzscheAPondkuleM, et al. Radius estimation of subsurface cylindrical objects from ground-penetrating-radar data using full-waveform inversion. Geophysics2018; 83(6): H43–H54.
17.
YangXvan der KrukJBikowskiJ, et al. Full-waveform inversion of GPR data in frequency-domain. In: 14th International conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR), Shanghai, China, 2012, pp. 324–328.
18.
AllaireG. Shape optimization by the homogenization method. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
19.
BendsøeMSigmundO.Topology optimization. Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
20.
HechtF.New development in FreeFem++. J Numer Math2012; 20: 251265.
