In this study, different alternatives to detect and localize damage from linear and nonlinear vibration responses were investigated. These alternatives were compared on two concrete slabs subjected to different damage extents. Linear and nonlinear modal test configurations were considered. The variations of linear resonant frequencies, modal assurance criterion values, and nonlinear hysteretic parameters were used to detect damage. Then, the modal shapes were used to locate damage positions. The maximum principal curvatures derived from the original modal shape displacements between damaged and undamaged states made it possible to spot the damaged zones. Damage localization was further enhanced by weighting the principal modal shape curvature differences for every mode by their respective variations of the nonlinear hysteretic parameter. Finally, damage localization was achieved using different outlier identification techniques.
AdamsRDCawleyP. The location of defects ins structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal1979; 14(2): 49–57.
5.
SalawuOS. Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct1997; 19(9): 718–723.
6.
FarrarCRJaureguiDA. Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I—experiment. Smart Mater Struct1998; 7: 704–719.
7.
HumarJBagchiAXuH. Performance of vibration-based techniques for the identification of structural damage. Struct Heal Monit2006; 5(3): 215–241.
8.
NdambiJ-MVantommeJHarriK. Damage assessment in reinforced concrete beams using eigenfrequencies and mode shape derivatives. Eng Struct2002; 24(4): 501–515.
9.
FanWQiaoP. Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Heal Monit2011; 10(1): 83–111.
10.
CardenEPFanningP. Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct Heal Monit2004; 3(4): 355–377.
11.
DoeblingSWFarrarCRPrimeMB. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib Dig1998; 30(2): 91–105.
12.
PandeyAKBiswasMSammanMM. Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib1991; 145(2): 321–332.
13.
MaiaNMMSilvaJMMAlmasEAM, et al. Damage detection in structures: from mode shape to frequency response function methods. Mech Syst Signal Process2003; 17(3): 489–498.
14.
Abdel WahabMMDe RoeckG. Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J Sound Vib1999; 226(2): 217–235.
15.
Van Den AbeeleKDe VisscherJ. Damage assessment in reinforced concrete using spectral and temporal nonlinear vibration techniques. Cem Concr Res2000; 30(9): 1453–1464.
16.
FanWQiaoP. A strain energy-based damage severity correction factor method for damage identification in plate-type structures. Mech Syst Signal Process2012; 28: 660–678.
17.
NavabianNBozorgnasabMTaghipourR, et al. Damage identification in plate-like structure using mode shape derivatives. Arch Appl Mech2016; 86(5): 819–830.
18.
ZhongHYangM. Damage detection for plate-like structures using generalized curvature mode shape method. J Civ Struct Heal Monit2016; 6(1): 141–152.
19.
KunduT (ed.). Nonlinear ultrasonic and vibro-acoustical techniques for nondestructive evaluation. Cham: Springer, 2019.
20.
JohnsonPSutinA. Slow dynamics and anomalous nonlinear fast dynamics in diverse solids. J Acoust Soc Am2005; 117(1): 124–130.
21.
TenCateJAJohnsonPA. Nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy: assessing global damage. In: KunduT (ed.) Nonlinear ultrasonic and vibro-acoustical techniques for nondestructive evaluation. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 89–101.
22.
Van Den AbeeleK. Multi-mode nonlinear resonance ultrasound spectroscopy (MuMoNRUS) for defect imaging: an analytical approach. J Acoust Soc Am2007; 122(1): 73–90.
23.
HagerI. Colour change in heated concrete. Fire Technol2014; 50(4): 945–958.
24.
FowlerTBlessingJConliskP, et al. The MONPAC system. J Acoust Emiss1989; 8(3): 1–8.
25.
EirasJNPayanCRakotonaviroS, et al. Damage detection and localization in concrete slabs through linear and nonlinear vibration analysis. Struct Heal Monit. Epub ahead of print November2019. DOI: 10.12783/shm2019/32138.
26.
ShihCYTsueiYGAllemangRJ, et al. Complex mode indication function and its applications to spatial domain parameter applications. Mech Syst Signal Process1988; 2(4): 367–377.
27.
EwinsD. Modal testing: theory and practice. 2nd ed. Baldock: Research Studies Press, 1995.
28.
ChenJJayapalanARKimJY, et al. Rapid evaluation of alkali-silica reactivity of aggregates using a nonlinear resonance spectroscopy technique. Cem Concr Res2010; 40(6): 914–923.
29.
EirasJNPopovicsJSBorracheroMV, et al. Nonlinear impact resonant acoustic spectroscopy to discern mechanical damage in cement based materials. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on experimental mechanics, Porto, 22–27 July 2012.
30.
BouchaalaFPayanCGarnierV, et al. Carbonation assessment in concrete by nonlinear ultrasound. Cem Concr Res2011; 41(5): 557–559.
31.
EirasJNKunduTPopovicsJS, et al. Evaluation of frost damage in cement-based materials by a nonlinear elastic wave technique. Proc SPIE Conf2014; 9064: 90641G.
32.
NazarovVEOstrovskyLASoustovaIA, et al. Nonlinear acoustics of micro-inhomogeneous media. Phys Earth Planet Inter1988; 50(1): 65–73.
33.
GuyerRTenCateJJohnsonP. Hysteresis and the dynamic elasticity of consolidated granular materials. Phys Rev Lett1999; 82(16): 3280–3283.
34.
AllemangRJBrownDL. A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. First Int Modal Anal Conf1982: 110–116.
35.
JaegerLG. Elementary theory of elastic plates. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1964.
36.
StubbsNKimJ-T. Damage detection in offshore jacket structures from limited modal information. Int J Offshore Polar Eng1995; 5(1): 58–66.
37.
HoYKEwinsDJ. On the structural damage identification with mode shapes. In: Proceedings of the European COST F3 conference on system identification and structural health monitoring, Madrid, 6–9 June 2000, pp. 677–686.
38.
YangMZhongHTelsteM, et al. Bridge damage localization through modified curvature method. J Civ Struct Heal Monit2016; 6(1): 175–188.
39.
StruikDJ. Lectures on classical differential geometry. New York: Dover Publications, 1988.
40.
Van Den AbeeleKLe BasPVanaverbekeS, et al. Nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy (NEWS): a diagnostic tool to detect microdamage with high potential for nondestructive testing. In: Proceedings of the 8th Congrès Français d’Acoustique, 2006, p. 328, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/39b2/8872af9c7ac77bf7d467d1e2ddb6a40bf624.pdf
41.
Van Den AbeeleKWindelsFCarmelietJ, et al. Characterization and imaging of microdamage using nonlinear resonance ultrasound spectroscopy (NRUS): an analytical model. In: DelsantoPP (ed.) Universality of nonclassical nonlinearity. 1st ed. New York: Springer, 2006, p. 565.
42.
WindelsFVan Den AbeeleK. The influence of localized damage in a sample on its resonance spectrum. Ultrasonics2004; 42: 1025–1029.
43.
Van Den AbeeleKSchubertFAleshinV, et al. Resonant bar simulations in media with localized damage. Ultrasonics2004; 42(1–9): 1017–1024.
44.
LiuXDaoZZhuJ, et al. Localization of material defects using nonlinear resonant ultrasound spectroscopy under asymmetric boundary conditions. Phys Procedia2010; 3(1): 55–61.
45.
LottMPayanCGarnierV, et al. Three-dimensional treatment of non equilibrium dynamics and higher order elasticity. Appl Phys Lett2015; 108(14): 141907.
46.
LottMPayanCGarnierV, et al. Three-dimensional modeling and numerical predictions of multimodal nonlinear behavior in damaged concrete blocks. J Acoust Soc Am2018; 144(3): 1154–1159.
TukeyJW. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Pearson Education, 1977.
49.
IglewiczBHoaglinDC. How to detect and handle outliers. In: MykytkaEF (ed.) ASQC basic references in quality control; Volume 16. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press, 1993.
50.
Zapico-ValleJLGarcía-DiéguezMGonzález-MartínezMP, et al. Experimental validation of a new statistical process control feature for damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process2011; 25(7): 2513–2525.
51.
SohnHAllenDWWordenK, et al. Structural damage classification using extreme value statistics. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2005; 127(1): 125.
52.
EirasJNPopovicsJSBorracheroMV, et al. The effects of moisture and micro-structural modifications in drying mortars on vibration-based NDT methods. Constr Build Mater2015; 94: 565–571.
53.
FotiD. Dynamic identification techniques to numerically detect the structural damage. Open Constr Build Technol J2013; 7: 43–50.
54.
PayanCGarnierVMoysanJ. Effect of water saturation and porosity on the nonlinear elastic response of concrete. Cem Concr Res2010; 40(3): 473–476.
55.
Van Den AbeeleKCarmelietJJohnsonPA, et al. Influence of water saturation on the nonlinear elastic mesoscopic response in Earth materials and the implications to the mechanism of nonlinearity. J Geophys Res2002; 107: 1–11.
56.
LoenderslootROoijevaarTHde BoerA, et al. Development of a damage quantification model for composite skin-stiffener structures. In: BollerCJanochaH (eds) New trends in smart technologies. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag, 2013, pp. 99–108.
57.
BaneenUKinkaidNMGuivantJE, et al. Vibration based damage detection of a beam-type structure using noise suppression method. J Sound Vib2012; 331(8): 1777–1788.
RatcliffeCP. Damage detection using a modified Laplacian operator on mode shape data. J Sound Vib1997; 204(3): 505–517.
60.
RatcliffeCP. A frequency and curvature based experimental method for locating damage in structures. J Vib Acoust2000; 122(3): 324.
61.
YoonMKHeiderDGillespieJW, et al. Local damage detection using the two-dimensional gapped smoothing method. J Sound Vib2005; 279(1–2): 119–139.
62.
BaneenUKausarZ. A baseline-free modal strain energy method for damage localisation. Int J Civ Eng2018; 16(6): 607–618.
63.
EirasJNPayanCRakotonarivoS, et al. Experimental modal analysis and finite element model updating for structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete radioactive waste packages. Constr Build Mater2018; 180: 531–543.
64.
Yi-Wei LinKMobleyJPratherWE, et al. Vibrational modes for the internal characterization of a full-scale transnuclear-32 dry storage cask for spent nuclear fuel assemblies. J Sound Vib2019; 460: 114881.
