Asbestos cement pipelines constitute a significant portion of the potable and waste water systems in many countries in the world, including Australia. Most of the asbestos cement pipes in the developed countries were installed before 1980, and many utilities are observing that the breakage rate is increasing with the ageing of the pipe. Condition assessment for asbestos cement pipes is of important necessity for prioritising rehabilitation and preventing catastrophic pipe failure; however, few techniques are available for direct assessment of the condition of asbestos cement pipes and most of them are localised and destructive. This article outlines a pilot field study of the non-invasive and non-destructive condition assessment of asbestos cement pipelines using fluid transient pressure waves. Fluid transient analysis previously conducted by the authors for metallic pipelines is further developed and adapted to asbestos cement pipes for the detection of localised defects. A new sub-sectional condition assessment technique is proposed for determining the effective wall thicknesses of asbestos cement sub-sections within a section of pipe bounded by two measurement points. A field trial is conducted in Australia on an asbestos cement water main (which has class changes with varying wall thicknesses) to verify the proposed techniques. The wave speeds, lengths and wall thicknesses of sub-sections in different classes are determined and the results are consistent with the information in the design drawings provided by the water utility. This field study, for the first time, verifies that controlled fluid transient waves can be used as a tool for non-invasive and non-destructive condition assessment of asbestos cement pipelines.
HuYWangDCossittK. AC pipe in North America: inventory, breakage, and working environments. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract2010; 1: 156–172.
2.
Al-AdeebAMMattiMA. Leaching corrosion of asbestos cement pipes. Int J Cem Compos Lightweight Concr1984; 6: 233–240.
3.
MattiMAAl-AdeebA. Sulphate attack on asbestos cement pipes. Int J Cem Compos Lightweight Concr1985; 7: 169–176.
4.
WangDCullimoreDR. Bacteriological challenges to asbestos cement water distribution pipelines. J Environ Sci2010; 22: 1203–1208.
5.
WangDCullimoreRHuY. Biodeterioration of asbestos cement (AC) pipe in drinking water distribution systems. Int Biodeter Biodegr2011; 65: 810–817.
6.
GilLPerezMABernatE. Loss of strength in asbestos-cement water pipes due to leaching. Struct Eng Mech2011; 40: 655–663.
7.
HuYWangDChowdhuryR. Condition assessment methods for AC pipe and current practices. In: Proceedings of the pipelines 2010: climbing new peaks to infrastructure reliability – renew, rehab, and reinvest, Keystone, CO, 28 August–1 September 2010, pp. 867–877. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
8.
De SilvaDDavisPBurnS. Condition assessment of cast iron and asbestos cement pipes by in-pipe probes and selective sampling for estimation of remaining life. In: Proceedings of the 20th international NO-DIG conference 2002, Copenhagen, 28–31 May 2002, paper no. 2.1. London, UK: International Society for Trenchless Technology.
9.
ChowdhuryRHuYWangD. Condition evaluation of asbestos cement water mains. In: Proceedings of the pipelines 2012: innovations in design, construction, operations, and maintenance – doing more with less, Miami Beach, FL, 19–22 August 2012, pp. 288–297. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
10.
MilletteJRLogsdonGSClarkPJ. Evaluating the condition of asbestos-cement pipe. Mater Performance1984; 23: 14–20.
11.
WangDHuYChowdhuryR. Examination of asbestos cement pipe deterioration with scanning electron microscopy. In: Proceedings of the pipelines 2011: a sound conduit for sharing solutions, Seattle, WA, 23–27 July 2011, pp. 65–78. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
12.
SmoldersSVerhoestLDe GueldreG. Inspection of deteriorating asbestos cement force mains with georadar technique. Water Sci Technol2009; 60: 995–1001.
13.
BrackenMJohnstonDColemanM. Acoustic based condition assessment of asbestos cement water transmission laterals. In: Proceedings of the pipelines 2010: climbing new peaks to infrastructure reliability – renew, rehab, and reinvest, Keystone, CO, 28 August–1 September 2010, pp. 815–825. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
14.
BeukenRHorstPDiemelR. Mains condition assessment by Echopulse, a validation of results. Proced Eng2014; 89: 1437–1444.
15.
GhidaouiMSZhaoMMcInnisDA. A review of water hammer theory and practice. Appl Mech Rev2005; 58: 49–75.
16.
CovasDRamosHDe AlmeidaAB. Standing wave difference method for leak detection in pipeline systems. J Hydraul Eng2005; 131: 1106–1116.
17.
LeePJVítkovskýJPLambertMF. Leak location using the pattern of the frequency response diagram in pipelines: a numerical study. J Sound Vib2005; 284: 1051–1073.
DuanH-FLeePJGhidaouiMS. Leak detection in complex series pipelines by using the system frequency response method. J Hydraul Res2011; 49: 213–221.
20.
GhazaliMFStaszewskiWWJShucksmithJD. Instantaneous phase and frequency for the detection of leaks and features in a pipeline system. Struct Health Monit2011; 10: 351–360.
21.
GongJLambertMFSimpsonAR. Single-event leak detection in pipeline using first three resonant responses. J Hydraul Eng2013; 139: 645–655.
22.
WangXJLambertMFSimpsonAR. Detection and location of a partial blockage in a pipeline using damping of fluid transients. J Water Resour Plann Manag2005; 131: 244–249.
23.
SattarAMChaudhryMHKassemAA. Partial blockage detection in pipelines by frequency response method. J Hydraul Eng2008; 134: 76–89.
24.
DuanH-FLeePJGhidaouiMS. Extended blockage detection in pipelines by using the system frequency response analysis. J Water Resour Plann Manag2012; 138: 55–62.
25.
MeniconiSDuanHFLeePJ. Experimental investigation of coupled frequency and time-domain transient test-based techniques for partial blockage detection in pipelines. J Hydraul Eng2013; 139: 1033–1044.
26.
MeniconiSBrunoneBFerranteM. In-line pipe device checking by short-period analysis of transient tests. J Hydraul Eng2011; 137: 713–722.
27.
HachemFESchleissAJ. Detection of local wall stiffness drop in steel-lined pressure tunnels and shafts of hydroelectric power plants using steep pressure wave excitation and wavelet decomposition. J Hydraul Eng2012; 138: 35–45.
28.
StephensMLLambertMFSimpsonAR. Determining the internal wall condition of a water pipeline in the field using an inverse transient model. J Hydraul Eng2013; 139: 310–324.
29.
GongJSimpsonARLambertMF. Detection of distributed deterioration in single pipes using transient reflections. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract2013; 4: 32–40.
30.
GongJStephensMLArbonNS. On-site non-invasive condition assessment for cement mortar-lined metallic pipelines by time-domain fluid transient analysis. Struct Health Monit2015; 14: 426–438.
31.
LeePJDuanHFGhidaouiM. Frequency domain analysis of pipe fluid transient behaviour. J Hydraul Res2013; 51: 609–622.
32.
CovasDStoianovIManoJF. The dynamic effect of pipe-wall viscoelasticity in hydraulic transients. Part I – experimental analysis and creep characterization. J Hydraul Res2004; 42: 516–530.
33.
DuanH-FLeePJGhidaouiMS. System response function-based leak detection in viscoelastic pipelines. J Hydraul Eng2012; 138: 143–153.
34.
MeniconiSBrunoneBFerranteM. Energy dissipation and pressure decay during transients in viscoelastic pipes with an in-line valve. J Fluid Struct2014; 45: 235–249.
35.
StephensML. Transient response analysis for fault detection and pipeline wall condition assessment in field water transmission and distribution pipelines and networks. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2008.
WylieEBStreeterVL. Fluid transients in systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1993, 463 pp.
38.
GongJLambertMFSimpsonAR. Distributed deterioration detection in single pipes using the impulse response function. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on water distribution systems analysis (WDSA 2012), Adelaide, SA, Australia, 24–27 September 2012, pp. 702–719. Barton, ACT, Australia: Engineers Australia.
39.
Standards Australia. Australian standard specification – asbestos cement pressure pipes (AS 1711-1975). Sydney, NSW, Australia: Standards Australia, 1975.
40.
WattersGZJeppsonRWFlammerGH. Water hammer in PVC and reinforced plastic pipe. J Hydraul Div1976; 102: 831–843.
41.
SeiptWR. Waterhammer considerations for PVC pipeline in irrigation systems. T ASAE1974; 17: 417–423.
42.
KimY. Advanced numerical and experimental transient modelling of water and gas pipeline flows incorporating distributed and local effects. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2008.
