Reinforced concrete shear walls are critical structural components in gravity and lateral force resisting systems. The objective of this work is to design and validate a monitoring system capable of rapid and automated damage assessment of reinforced concrete shear walls. The proposed system is based on a sparse array of piezoelectric transducers to receive acoustic emissions distributed across the wall and a statistical pattern recognition algorithm capable of identifying critical structural conditions to inform decision makers on the need for repair to ensure safe operation of the structure. The proposed system was validated on a full-scale reinforced concrete shear wall subjected to quasi-static cyclic loading.
GrosseCUOhtsuM. Acoustic emission testing—basics for research-applications in civil engineering. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
2.
RensKLWipfTJKlaiberFW. Review of nondestructive evaluation techniques of civil infrastructure. J Perform Constr Fac1997; 11(4): 152–160.
3.
SalamoneSVeletzosMJLanzaDiScaleaF. Detection of initial yield and onset of failure in bonded post-tensioned concrete beams. J Bridge Eng2012; 17(6): 1’9 .
4.
SalamoneSBartoliIPhillipsR. Health monitoring of prestressing tendons in posttensioned concrete bridges. J Transport Res Board2011; 2220: 21–27.
5.
OhnoKOhtsuM. Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission. Construct Build Mater2010; 24(12): 2339–2346.
6.
OhtsuMYOnoK. A generalized theory of acoustic emission and green’s function in a half space. J Acoust Emiss1984; 3(1): 27–40.
7.
GutenbergBRichterCF. Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. In: Frequency and energy of earthquakes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949, pp. 17–19.
8.
HardyHRJr.Application of acoustic emission techniques to rock mechanics research. Am Soc Test Mater1972; 505: 41–83.
9.
ColomboISMainIGFordeMC. Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using ‘b-value’ analysis of acoustic emission signals. J Mater Civil Eng2003; 15: 280–286.
10.
KurzJH. stress drop and stress redistribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Struct Health Monit2006; 5(1): 69–81.
11.
ShiotaniTYuyumaSLiZ. Application of AE improved b-value to quantitative evaluation of fracture process in concrete materials. J Acoust Emiss2001; 19: 118–133.
12.
CarpinteriALacidognaGNiccoliniG. Critical defect size distributions in concrete structures detected by the acoustic emission technique. Meccanica2007; 43(3): 349–363.
13.
SchumacherTHigginsCCLovejoySC. Estimating operating load conditions on reinforced concrete highway bridges with b-value analysis from acoustic emission monitoring. Struct Health Monit2010; 10(1): 17–32.
14.
ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318-08). 2008. American Concrete Institute (ACI) located in Farmington Hills, MI, USA. ISBN: 9780870312649.
15.
RocksJF. Large scale testing of low aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 2011.
16.
CarterDCHolfordKM. Strategic consideration for the AE monitoring of bridges: a discussion and case study. Insight1998; 40(2): 112–116.
17.
HolfordKMLarkRJ. Acoustic emission testing of bridges. In: GongkangF (ed.) Inspection and monitoring techniques for bridges and structures. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2005. 183–215.
ShiotaniT. Parameter analysis. In: GrosseCUOhtsuM (eds) Acoustic emission testing. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 41–51.
20.
KurzJHFinckFGrosseCU. Stress drop and stress redistribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Struct Health Monit2006; 5(1): 69–81.
21.
RizzoPCammarataMBartoliI. Ultrasonic guided waves-based monitoring of rail head: laboratory and field tests (Article ID 291293). Adv Civ Eng2010; 13 pp.
22.
RizzoPSorriviELanza Di ScaleaF. Wavelet-based outlier analysis for guided wave structural monitoring: application to multi-wire strands. J Sound Vib2007; 307: 52–68.
23.
RizzoPCammarataMDuttaD. An unsupervised learning algorithm for fatigue crack detection in waveguides. Smart Mater Struct2009; 18: 025016 (11 pp).
24.
SalamoneSLanza di ScaleaFBartoliI. Damage detection in UAV wing skin-to-spar joints based on outlier analysis of guided wave energy. J Intel Mater Syst Str2009; 20(9): 1079–1090.
25.
BartoliISalamoneSPhillipsR. Use of interwire ultrasonic leakage to quantify loss of prestress in multi-wire tendons. J Eng Mech2011; 135(5): 324–334.
26.
BarnettVLewisT. Outliers in statistical data. 3rd ed.Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1994, pp. 52–171.
LunaBN. Seismic response of low aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls for building and safety-related nuclear applications. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, NY, in preparation.
29.
MasseyFJ. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc1951; 46(253): 68–78.
30.
HustonD. Structural sensing, health monitoring, and performance evaluation. Boca Raton, FL, USA, Taylor & Francis, 2011.
31.
HolzerT. L.BarkaA. A.CarverD.., USGS Circular 1193: implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA, 2000.
KamWYAkguzelUPampaninS. 4 weeks on: preliminary reconnaissance report from the Christchurch 22 Feb 2011 6.3MW earthquake. Report from New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Inc., 2011. 8April2011, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE), Christchurch Earthquake Clearinghouse, New Zealand.
