The combined use of finite element modeling and structural health monitoring is becoming increasingly relevant in bridge maintenance. A growing number of new and old structures is instrumented with different kinds of sensors driven by dedicated hardware and software, while numerical models are used to simulate the response of the structures under various scenarios. This paper presents the monitoring of the Smithfield Street Bridge, one of the oldest and most iconic bridges in the city of Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania, USA). The bridge was instrumented by an independent party, not involved with the research presented here, with strain, displacement, and rotation wireless sensors. A detailed finite element model of one of the spans of the bridge was developed to calculate the strains induced by standardized trucks under pristine and simulated damage conditions. In addition, the model enabled to determine the sensitivity necessary to detect relevant structural changes in the bridge. The results of the numerical analyses were then compared with the results of a test in which a truck of known weight crossed the bridge multiple times. Finally, the data relative to 3 years of uninterrupted monitoring were processed and analyzed to identify eventual anomalies.
GlisicB. Concise historic overview of strain sensors used in the monitoring of civil structures: the first one hundred years. Sensors2022; 22(6): 2397.
8.
BarthorpeRJMansonGWordenK. On multi-site damage identification using single-site training data. J Sound Vib2017; 409: 43–64.
9.
WordenKMansonG. The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A2007; 365(1851): 515–537.
10.
ZhangZSunC. Multi-site structural damage identification using a multi-label classification scheme of machine learning. Measurement2020; 154: 107473.
11.
GhahremaniBEnshaeianARizzoP. Bridge health monitoring using strain data and high-fidelity finite element analysis. Sensors2022; 22(14): 5172.
12.
BagheriAPistoneERizzoP. Outlier analysis and artificial neural network for the noncontact nondestructive evaluation of immersed plates. Res Nondestr Eval2015; 26(3): 154–173.
13.
ZhengBRizzoPNasrollahiA. Outlier analysis of nonlinear solitary waves for health monitoring applications. Struct Health Monit2020; 19(4): 1160–1174.
14.
RizzoPSorriviELanzadiScaleaF, et al. Wavelet-based outlier analysis for guided wave structural monitoring: application to multi-wire strands. J Sound Vib2007; 307(1–2): 52–68.
15.
LanzadiScaleaFRizzoPCocciaS, et al. Non-contact ultrasonic inspection of rails and signal processing for automatic defect detection and classification. Insight2005; 47(6): 346–353.
16.
RizzoPEnshaeianA. Bridge health monitoring in the United States: a Review. Struct Monit Maint2021; 8(1): 1–50.
17.
FrenchCEWShieldCKHedegaardBD. Modeling and monitoring the long-term behavior of post-tensioned concrete bridges. Report No. MN/RC 2014-39, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, 2014.
18.
HedegaardBDFrenchCEShieldCK, et al. Instrumentation and modeling of I-35W St. Anthony Falls bridge. J Bridge Eng2013; 18(6): 476–485.
19.
FrenchCEWShieldCKStolarskiHK, et al. Instrumentation, monitoring, and modeling of the I-35W Bridge. Report No. MN/RC 2012-24, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, 2012.
20.
GaeblerKOHedegaardBDShieldCK, et al. Signal selection and analysis methodology of long-term vibration data from the I-35W St. Anthony Falls Bridge. Struct Control Health Monit2018; 25(7): e2182.
21.
HedegaardBDFrenchCEShieldCK. Time-dependent monitoring and modeling of I-35W St. Anthony Falls Bridge. I: analysis of monitoring data. J Bridge Eng2017; 22(7): 04017025.
22.
HedegaardBDFrenchCEShieldCK. Long-term monitoring strategy for time-dependent deflections of posttensioned concrete bridges. J Bridge Eng2017; 22(11): 04017095.
23.
ShentonHWIIIAl-KhateebHTChajesMJ, et al. Indian river inlet bridge (part A): description of the bridge and the structural health monitoring system. Bridge Struct2017; 13(1): 3–13.
24.
ShentonHWIIIChajesMJWenczelG, et al. Load tests of the Charles W. Cullen bridge at Indian river inlet. Technical Report, Center for Innovative Bridge Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 2016.
25.
ShentonHWIIIChajesMJWenczelG, et al. Inaugural load test of the Charles W. Cullen bridge at Indian river inlet. Report No. DCT 238, Center for Innovative Bridge Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 2013.
26.
Al-KhateebHTShentonHWIIIChajesMJ, et al. Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using regularly conducted diagnostic load tests. Front Built Environ2019; 5(41): 1–12.
27.
NatalicchioC. Model calibration of the Indian River Inlet Bridge using structural health monitoring strain data. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 2018.
28.
YuSOuJ. Structural health monitoring and model updating of Aizhai suspension bridge. J Aerosp Eng2017; 30(2): B4016009-1-15.
29.
SchluneHPlosMGylltoftK. Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using static and dynamic measurements. Eng Struct2009; 31(7): 1477–1485.
30.
HeXHYuZWChenZQ. Finite element model updating of existing steel bridge based on structural health monitoring. J Cent South Univ Technol2008; 15(3): 399–403.
31.
DuanYFXuYLFeiQG, et al. Advanced finite element model of Tsing Ma Bridge for structural health monitoring. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2011; 11(2): 313–344.
32.
GattiM. Structural health monitoring of an operational bridge: a case study. Eng Struct2019; 195: 200–209.
33.
SchommerSNguyenVHMaasS, et al. Model updating for structural health monitoring using static and dynamic measurements. Procedia Eng2017; 199: 2146–2153.
34.
VenutiFDomaneschiMLizanaM, et al. Finite element models of a benchmark footbridge. Appl Sci2021; 11(19): 9024.
35.
CatbasFNSusoyMFrangopolDM. Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data. Eng Struct2008; 30(9): 2347–2359.
36.
KulcuEQinXBarrishJRA, et al. Information technology and data management issues for health monitoring of the Commodore Barry Bridge. In: Proceedings of the SPIE’s 5th annual international symposium on nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring of aging infrastructure; SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng2000, Newport Beach, CA, USA, pp. 98–111.
37.
PinesDAktanAE. Status of structural health monitoring of long-span bridges in the United States. Prog Struct Eng Mater2002; 4(4): 372–380.
38.
HuangHBYiTHLiHN, et al. New representative temperature for performance alarming of bridge expansion joints through temperature-displacement relationship. J Bridge Eng2018; 23(7): 04018043.
