The advent of composite co-cured and co-bonded integrated construction in aircraft structures has lead to the replacement of fastened joints with bonded joints between the skins and the stiffeners. Skin-stiffener debonds could occur due to impact or other operational reasons and is usually internal. One of the aspects of structural health monitoring technologies is to be able to detect and assess skin-stiffener separation in composite structures. This article presents the results of tests conducted with composite testboxes to study the effect of skin-stiffener separation on the strain profiles. Different types of testboxes were fabricated and tested to compare bolted, co-bonded, and co-cured configurations. Bending loads were applied on the boxes, and the strains were measured near and away from the debonds using both strain gages and fiber Bragg grating sensors. The difference in the strains between healthy and unhealthy boxes are indicative of the presence of the debonds in the structure. These strain differences could be used in conjunction with suitable pattern recognition tools such as neural networks for damage detection and health monitoring.
Boller, C. ( 2000). Next generation structural health monitoring and its integration into aircraft design. International Journal of Systems Science, 31(11), 1333-1349.
2.
Keilers, C.H. and Chang, F.K. (1995). Identifying delaminations in composite beams using built-in piezoelectrics: part (i) - experiments and analysis; part (ii) - an identification method. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 6, 649-672.
3.
Lee, B.C. and Staszewski, W.J. (2007). Sensor location studies for damage detection with Lamb waves. Smart Materials & Structures, 16(2), 399-408.
4.
Guo, N. and Cawley, P. ( 1993). The interaction of Lamb waves with delaminations in composite laminates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(4), 2240-2246.
5.
Ramadas, C., Balasubramaniam, K., Joshi, M. and Krishnamurthy, C.V. ( 2008). Detection of transverse cracks in a composite beam using combined features of Lamb wave and vibration techniques in ANN environment . International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems , 1(4), 970-984.
6.
Soma Sekhar, B.V., Balasubramaniam , K. and Krishnamurthy, C.V. (2006 ). Structural health monitoring of fiber-reinforced composite plates for low-velocity impact damage using ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography . Structural Health Monitoring, 5(3), 243-253.
7.
Udd, E. (ed.) (1995). Fibre Optic Smart Structures, Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
8.
Menendez, J.M., Munoz, P., Pintado, J.M. and Guemes, J.A. ( 2004). Damage detection in composite materials by FBGs. In: Proceedings of SPIE V5502, Second European Workshop on Optical Fiber Sensors, Santander, Spain, pp. 451-454.
9.
Guemes, J.A. and Menendez, J.M. (2002). Response of Bragg grating fiber optic sensors embedded in composite laminates. Composite Science & Technology, 62, 959-966.
10.
Diaz-Carrillo, S., Sancho, J., Torres, E. and Guemes, J.A. (2000). Measurement of strain around holes in CFRP bolted joints by means of Bragg gratings. Proceedings of SPIE, 4185, 704-707.
11.
Betz, D.C., Thursby, G., Culshaw, B. and Staszewski, W.J. ( 2007). Structural damage location with fiber Bragg grating rosettes and Lamb waves. Structural Health Monitoring, 6, 299-308.
12.
Martin Jr, W.N., Ghoshal, A., Sundaresan, M.J., Lebby, G., Pratap, P.R. and Schulz, M.J. (2005). An artificial neural receptor system for structural health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring: An International Journal, 4(3), 229-245.
13.
Sundaram, R., Kamath, G.M., Gupta, N. and Subba Rao, M. ( 2005). Structural health monitoring of co-cured composite structures using FBG sensors. In: Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems, Newport Beach, USA.
14.
Larson, E.C. ( 2005). Embedded sensors for structural health monitoring, AIAA 2005-6356. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA.
15.
Kamath, G.M., Sundaram, R., Babu, E.J.P., Gupta, N. and Subba Rao, M. ( 2006). A neural network based health monitoring methodology for co-cured/ co-bonded composite aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Granada, Spain.
16.
Bergmann, H.W. ( 1999). Fatigue Behaviour and Damage Tolerance of Composites, Course Lecture Notes. Bangalore, India: National Aerospace Laboratories.
17.
Williams, J.F. , Stouffer, D.C., Ilic, S. and Jones, R. (1986). An analysis of delamination behaviour. Composite Structures, 5, 203-216.
18.
Whitcomb, J.D. (1989). Three-dimensional analysis of a postbuckled embedded delamination. Journal of Composite Materials, 23, 862-889.
19.
Pavier, M.J. and Chester, W.T. (1990). Compression failure of carbon-fibre coupons containing central delaminations. Composites, 21, 23-31.
20.
Peck, S.O. and Springer, G.S. ( 1991). The behaviour of delaminations in composite plates - analytical and experimental results. Journal of Composite Materials, 25, 907-929.
21.
Kutlu, Z. and Chang, F.K. ( 1992). Modeling compression failure of laminated composites containing multiple through-the-width delaminations. Journal of Composite Materials, 26, 350-387.
22.
Kutlu, Z. and Chang, F.K. ( 1995). Composite panels containing multiple through-the-width delaminations and subjected to compression. Part 1: AnalysisComposite Structures, 31, 273-296.
23.
Kutlu, Z. and Chang, F.K. ( 1995). Composite panels containing multiple through-the-width delaminations and subjected to compression. Part 2: Experiments and verificationComposite Structures, 31, 297-314.
24.
Kyoung, W.M. , Kim, C.G. and Hong, C.S. (1998). Modelling of composite laminates with multiple delaminations under compressive loading. Journal of Composite Materials, 32, 951-968.
25.
Guynn, E.G. and O’Brien, T.K. ( 1985). The influence of lay-up and thickness on composite impact damage and compression strength. In: Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ SAE 26th SDM Conference, Orlando, Florida, pp. 187-196.
26.
Byers, B.A. ( 1980). Behaviour of damaged graphite/ epoxy laminates under compression loading, NASA-CR-1592 93.
27.
Wu, H.T. ( 1986). Impact damage of composites. PhD Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University.
28.
Choi, H.Y. and Chang, F.K. ( 1992). A model for predicting damage in graphite/epoxy laminated composites resulting from low-velocity point impact. Journal of Composites, 26(14), 2134-2169.
29.
Dorey, G., Sigety, P., Stellbrink, K. and Hart, W.G. ( 1987). Impact damage tolerance of carbon fibre and hybrid laminates. RAE Technical Report 87057.
30.
Stevens, K.A. , Ricci, R. and Davies, G.A.O. (1995). Buckling and postbuckling of composite structures. Composites, 26(3), 189-199.
31.
Falzon, B.G. , Stevens, K.A. and Davies, G.A.O. (2000). Postbuckling behaviour of a blade-stiffened composite panel loaded in uniaxial compression. Composites: Part A, 31, 459-468.
