This paper presents the acoustic design of a new anechoic wind tunnel and its evaluation through simulations and experiments. An experimental method is proposed to estimate, in situ, the individual transmission losses of acoustically treated guide vanes and diffuser, without flow, from measured impulse responses. Results are compared with finite element simulations, showing comparable 1/3-octave transmission losses from 1 to 5 kHz; however, the simulations are highly sensitive to the material properties in the impedance model. The total background noise in the wind tunnel test section is estimated from transmission losses and compared with measurements at 70 m/s flow. Below 200 Hz, agreement is good; at higher frequencies, measured noise is up to 30 dB higher due to turbulent boundary layer and Kevlar roughness noise. An airfoil noise benchmark is also presented, showing a single-microphone signal-to-noise ratio up to 8 dB below 1–2 kHz.
HubbardHHManningJC. Aeroacoustic research facilities at NASA langley research center: description and operational characteristics. Technical report1983.
2.
Pott-PollenskeMDelfsJ. Enhanced capabilities of the aeroacoustic wind tunnel braunschweig. In: 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference).American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).
3.
ItoTUraHNakakitaK, et al.Aerodynamic/Aeroacoustic testing in anechoic closed test sections of low-speed wind tunnels. In: 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (31st AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., pp. 2010–3750.
4.
BergmannA.The aeroacoustic wind tunnel DNW-NWB. In: 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference).American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).
5.
MéryF. Low speed anechoic closed test section at ONERA S1MA wind tunnel. 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2016.
6.
SarradjEFritzscheCGeyerT, et al.Acoustic and aerodynamic design and characterization of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Appl Acoust2009; 70(8): 1073–1080.
7.
ChongTJosephPDaviesP. Design and performance of an open jet wind tunnel for aero-acoustic measurement. Appl Acoust2009; 70(4): 605–614.
DevenportWBakCBrownK, et al.Design and operation of hybrid aeroacoustic wind tunnels. In: Design and Operation of Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel Tests for Group and Air Transport. STO-EN-AVT.
10.
LiuPXingYGuoH, et al.Design and performance of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Appl Acoust2017; 116: 65–69.
11.
de SantanaLSandersMPJVennerCH. The utwente aeroacoustic wind tunnel upgrade. 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2018, p. 12.
12.
MayerYDJawaharHKSzőkeM, et al.Design and performance of an aeroacoustic wind tunnel facility at the university of Bristol. Appl Acoust2019; 155: 358–370.
13.
DoolanCMoreauDAwasthiM, et al.The UNSW anechoic wind tunnel. In: Australian Acoustical Society Annual Conference, AAS 2018. Australian Acoustical Society, pp. 79–80.
14.
Merino-MartinezRCarpioARPereiraLTL, et al.Aeroacoustic design and characterization of the 3d–printed, open–jet, anechoic wind tunnel of delft university of technology. Appl Acoust2020; 170: 1–26.
15.
BeranekLLLabateSIngardU. Noise control for NACA supersonic wind tunnel. J Acoust Soc Am1955; 27(1): 85–98.
16.
SodermanPHoglundL. Wind-tunnel fan noise reduction including effects of turning vanes on noise propagation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp. 1–6.
17.
HaydenREWilbyJF. Sources, paths, and concepts for reduction of noise in the test section of the NASA langley 4x7m wind tunnel. Technical report1984.
18.
MunjalML. Acoustics of ducts and mufflers: with application to exhaust and ventilation system design. Wiley, 1987.
RaesAC. A tentative method for the measurement of sound transmission losses in unfinished buildings. J Acoust Soc Am1955; 27(1): 98–102.
21.
GaraiMGuidorziP. European methodology for testing the airborne sound insulation characteristics of noise barriers in situ: experimental verification and comparison with laboratory data. J Acoust Soc Am2000; 108(3): 1054–1067.
Acoustics – determination of sound power levels and sound energy levels of noise sources using sound pressure – precision methods for anechoic rooms and hemi-anechoic rooms standard, International Organization for Standardization, 2012.
24.
CoxTJ. Acoustic absorbers and diffusers. CRC Press, 2002.
25.
JacobsenFJuhlPM. Fundamentals of general linear acoustics. Wiley, 2013.
SchroederMRKuttruffKH. On frequency response curves in rooms. Comparison of experimental, theoretical, and monte carlo results for the average frequency spacing between maxima. J Acoust Soc Am1962; 34(1): 76–80.
28.
NélisseHNicolasJ. Characterization of a diffuse field in a reverberant room. J Acoust Soc Am1997; 101(6): 3517–3524.
29.
BeissnerK. On the plane-wave approximation of acoustic intensity. J Acoust Soc Am1982; 71(6): 1406–1411.
30.
GleggSSzőkeMDevenportW. Acoustic transmission loss and noise from kevlar wind tunnel walls. Int J Aeroacoustics2022; 21: 382–409.
31.
GleggSDevenportW. Aeroacoustics of low mach number flows: fundamentals, analysis, and measurement. 2017.
32.
SarradjEHeroldGSijtsmaPet al.A microphone array method benchmarking exercise using synthesized input data. In: 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2017. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
33.
BahrCJHumphreysWMErnstD, et al.A comparison of microphone phased array methods applied to the study of airframe noise in wind tunnel testing. In: 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, pp. 1–19.
34.
FischerABakCLylloffO, et al. Cross validation of the aerodynamic and acoustic measurements in two kevlar-walled wind tunnels. J Phys Conf The Science of Making Torque from Wind 2022, Torque 2022. IOP Publishing2022; 2265: 022103. Conference Date: 01-06-2022 Through 03-06-2022.
35.
i PlazaGVFischerALylloffO, et al.Benchmarking of the naca 63018 trailing-edge noise in a broad reynolds number range as part of the iea task 39. In: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Conference date: 14-06-2022 Through 17-06-2022.
