This paper describes new techniques for analysing cavity flows. The beamforming method is used to estimate the pressure fluctuations inside a resonant transonic cavity, highlighting the localisation of the sources of noise. The method produces insightful results and only requires the use of an acoustic array and a mean flow-field. The technique models the noise propagation in a simple and efficient way, applicable for wind tunnel test. In addition, this paper discusses the generation of the cavity tones. Computational fluid dynamics results are analysed using a superposition of reflected acoustic waves driven by the cavity flow. This analysis shows that the time-averaged flow-field drives the frequencies of the tones, while the flow-field fluctuations drive their amplitude. In addition, the tonal dynamics of the cavity flow are represented by a simple model with standing wave oscillations and their modulation. This work is complementary to the well-established Rossiter cavity model.
Rossiter JE. Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Technical Report 64037, October 1964. Bedford: Royal Aircraft Establishment.
LawsonSBarakosG. Review of numerical simulations for high-speed, turbulent cavity flows. Prog Aerosp Sci2011; 47: 186–216.
4.
TamCBlockP. On the tones and pressure oscillations induced by flow over rectangular cavities. J Fluid Mech1978; 89: 373–399.
5.
HandaTMiyachiHKakunoHet al.Modeling of a feedback mechanism in supersonic deep-cavity flows. AIAA J2015; 53: 420–425.
6.
Alvarez J, Kerschen E and Tumin A. A theoretical model for cavity acoustic resonances in subsonic flow. In: Proceedings of the 10th AIAA CEAS aeroacoustics conference, paper no. AIAA 2004-2845, Manchester, UK, 2004, pp.1–12. Manchester, UK: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
Wagner J, Casper K, Beresh S, et al. Relationship between acoustic tones and flow structure in transonic cavity flow. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, paper no. AIAA 2015-2937, pp.1–16. Dallas, TX: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, 2015.
9.
KegeriseMSpinaEGargSet al.Mode-switching and nonlinear effects in compressible flow over a cavity. Phys Fluids2004; 16: 678–687.
10.
FlahertyWReedyTElliottGet al.Investigation of cavity flow using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA J2014; 52: 2462–2470.
11.
LawsonSJSteijlRWoodgateMet al.High performance computing for challenging problems in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci2012; 52: 19–29.
12.
HirtCWAmstenAACookJL. An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J Comput Phys1974; 14: 227–253.
13.
OsherSChakravarthyS. Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to Euler equations in general geometries. J Comput Phys1983; 50: 447–481.
van LeerB. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J Comput Phys1979; 32: 101–136.
16.
van Albada G, van Leer B and Roberts W. A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics, upwind and high-resolution schemes. In: Hussaini MY, van Leer B and Van Rosendale J (eds) Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1997, pp.95–103.
17.
AxelssonO. Iterative solution methods, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 504–557.
18.
Jameson A, Schmidt W and Turkel E. Numerical solutions of Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. In: Proceedings of the 14th fluid and plasma dynamic conference, 1981, paper no. 1981-1259, pp.1–19. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
19.
JarkowskiMWoodgateMBarakosGet al.Towards consistent hybrid overset mesh methods for Rotorcraft CFD. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2014; 74: 543–576.
20.
MenterFEgorovY. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow Turbul Combust2010; 85: 113–138.
21.
EgorovYMenterFLechnerRet al.The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 2: application to complex flows. Flow Turbul Combust2010; 85: 139–165.
22.
BabuSZografakisGBarakosGNet al.Evaluation of scale-adaptive simulation for transonic cavity flows. Int J Eng Syst Model Simulat2016; 8: 106–124.
23.
ChildersD. Modern spectrum analysis. Chapter 2, New York: IEEE Press, 1978, pp. 23–148.
24.
LarchevequeLSagautPComteP. Large-eddy simulation of a compressible flow in a three-dimensional open cavity at high Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech2004; 516: 265–301.
25.
Gelfand S. Hearing: an introduction to psychological and physiological acoustics. 5th ed. Essex, UK: Informa Healthcare, 2010, pp.1–19.
26.
BussowR. An algorithm for the continuous Morlet wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process2007; 21: 2970–2979.
27.
SchmidtRO. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat1986; AP-34: 276–280.
28.
Simley E. Development of an acoustic array for wind turbine aeroacoustic noise analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, 2010.
29.
Nightingale D, Ross J and Foster G. Cavity unsteady pressure measurements – examples from wind-tunnel tests. Tech. Rep. Version 3, Aerodynamics & Aeromechanics Systems Group, QinetiQ, Bedford, UK, November 2005.
30.
Prime Z and Doolan C. A comparison of popular beamforming arrays. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Australian acoustical society 2013, Victor Harbor, SA, 2013, pp.151–157. Victor Harbor, SA, Australia: Australian Acoustical Society.
31.
LeeB. Effect of captive stores on internal weapons bay floor pressure distributions. J Aircraft2010; 47: 732–735.
32.
AllenRMendonaFKirkhamD. RANS and DES turbulence model predictions of noise on the M219 cavity at M=0.85. Int J Aeroacoust2015; 4: 135–151.
33.
Peng S-H. M219 Cavity flow, DESider a European effort on hybrid RANS-LES modelling. In: Haase W, Braza M and Revell A (eds) DESider a European effort on hybrid RANS-LES modelling. Vol. 103. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2009, pp.270–285.
34.
Temmerman L, Tartinville B and Hirsch C. URANS investigation of the transonic M219 cavity, progress in hybrid RANS-LES modelling: papers contributed to the 4th symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES methods, Beijing, China, September 2011. Edited by Fu S, Haase W, Peng S-H, et al. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp.471–481. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
35.
Ross JA. PIV measurements of the flowfields in an aerodynamically deep cavity. Tech rep Aerodynamics & Aeromechanics Systems Group, QinetiQ, Bedford, UK, October 2002.
36.
RyanJG. Criterion for the minimum source distance at which plane-wave beamforming can be applied. J Acoust Soc Am1998; 104: 595–598.
37.
Heller H and Bliss D. The physical mechanism of flow-induced pressure fluctuations in cavities and concepts for their suppression. In: Proceedings of the second aeroacoustics conference, Hampton, VA, United States, paper no. AlAA 1975-491, 1975. Hampton, VA, United States: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
38.
Kegerise M, Spina E and Cattafesta L. An experimental investigation of flow-induced cavity oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 30th fluid dynamics conference, Norfolk, VA, United States, paper no. AlAA 99-3705, 1999. Norfolk, VA, United States: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
39.
GargSCattafestaLIII. Quantitative schlieren measurements of coherent structures in a cavity shear layer. Exp Fluids2001; 30: 123–134.
40.
Casper K, Wagner J, Beresh S, et al. Spatial distribution of pressure resonance in compressible cavity flow. In: Proceedings of the 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Grapevine, TX, United States, paper no. AIAA 2017-1476, 2017, pp. 1–9. Grapevine, TX, United States: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
41.
Lurton X. An introduction to underwater acoustics: principles and applications. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Praxis Publishing, 2002, p.63.
42.
Hirsch C. Numerical computation of internal and external flows: the fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980, p.197.
43.
Loupy G, Barakos G and Taylor N. Cavity flow over a transonic weapon bay during door operation. J Aircraft 2017; 1–16.
