The synthetic array technique has previously been used to provide insight for developing improved microphone array data processing techniques. In recent work, however, it has also been successfully applied to diagnose the source of unexpected (and nonphysical) tones which arose in unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of hot supersonic jets. The insight obtained from this method has allowed the authors to rapidly arrive at a strategy that greatly improves the results. This success opens up additional areas where the synthetic array technique can find application.
Nelson CC, Cain AB, Raman G, et al. Numerical studies of wind turbine acoustics. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 9–12 January 2012, AIAA paper 2012-0006.
2.
DuYKuoC-WMorrisPJ. Simulations and measurements of the flow and noise in hot supersonic jets. Noise Control Eng J2012; 60: 577–594.
3.
HennesCLopesLShireyJ. PSUWOPWOP user’s manual, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2009.
4.
Ffowcs WilliamsJEHawkingsDL. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil Trans R Soc A1969; 264: 321–342.
5.
LockardDPMorrisPJ. Radiated noise from airfoils in realistic mean flows. AIAA J1998; 36: 907–914.
6.
Shieh CM and Morris PJ. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional turbulent cavity flows. In: 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, 8–11 January 2001, AIAA paper 2001-0511.
7.
Paliath U and Morris PJ. Prediction of jet noise from circular beveled nozzles. In: 11th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Monterey, California, 23–25 May 2005, AIAA paper 2005-3096.
8.
Paliath U and Morris PJ. Prediction of jet noise from rectangular nozzles. In: 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 2006, AIAA paper 2006-0618.
MittalRIaccarinoG. Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2005; 37: 239–261.
11.
Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed-boundary/B-spline methods for simulations of flow in complex geometries. In: CTR Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford Univ., 1997, pp.317–327.
12.
Spalart PR and Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: 30th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, 6–9 January 1992, AIAA paper 92-0439.
13.
Spalart PR, Jou WH, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In: Proceedings of the advances in DNS/LES: 1st AFOSR international conference on DNS/LES, Arlington, TX, 4–8 August 1997. Columbus, OH: Greyden Press.
14.
GrinsteinF. Recent progress on monotone integrated large eddy simulation of free jets. JSME Int J2006; 49: 890–898.
15.
ShurMLSpalartPRStreletsMKh. Noise prediction for increasingly complex jets. Part I: methods and tests. Int J Aeroacoust2005; 4: 213–246.
16.
ShurMLSpalartPRStreletsMKh. Noise prediction for increasingly complex jets. Part II: applications. Int J Aeroacoust2005; 4: 247–266.
17.
Brès GA. Modeling the noise of arbitrary maneuvering rotorcraft: analysis and implementation of the PSU-WOPWOP noise prediction code. M.S. thesis. University Park, PA: Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 2002.
18.
Perez G. Investigation of the influence of maneuver on rotorcraft noise. M.S. thesis. University Park, PA: Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 2002.
Dougherty RP. Functional beamforming for aeroacoustic source distributions. In: 20th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 16–20 June 2014, AIAA paper 2014-3066.
28.
Dougherty RP, Brentner K, Cain AB, et al. Improved phased array measurement techniques for jet noise understanding. In: Proceeding of the 16th international conference on fluid flow technologies conference on modelling fluid flow (CMFF'15), Budapest, Hungary, 1–4 September 2015.
29.
SijtsmaP. CLEAN based on spatial source coherence. Int J Aeroacoustics2007; 6: 357–374.
30.
Brooks TF and Humphreys WM Jr. A deconvolution approach for the mapping of acoustic sources (DAMAS) determined from phased microphone arrays. In: 10th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Manchester, Great Britain, 10–12 May 2004, AIAA paper 2004-2954.
31.
Dougherty RP, Ramachandran RC and Raman G. Deconvolution of sources in aeroacoustic images from phased microphone arrays using linear programming. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Berlin, Germany, 27–29 May 2013, AIAA paper 2013-2210.
32.
SarradjE. A fast signal subspace approach for the determination of absolute levels from phased microphone array measurements. J Sound Vib2010; 329: 1553–1569.
33.
Bridges J, Wernet MP and Frate FC. PIV measurements of chevrons on F400-series tactical aircraft nozzle model. In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Orlando, Florida, 4–7 January 2011, AIAA paper 2011-1157.
34.
McLaughlinDKBridgesJKuoC. On the scaling of small, heat simulated jet noise measurements to moderate size exhaust jets. Int J Aeroacoust2010; 9: 627–654.
35.
Du Y and Morris PJ. Noise simulations of supersonic hot jets for chevron nozzles. In: 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Portland, Oregon, 5–8 June 2011, AIAA paper 2011-2787.
36.
Mendez S, Shoeybi M, Sharma A, et al. Post-processing of large-eddy simulations for jet noise predictions. In: CTR Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford Univ., 2009, pp.17–31.