This study seeks to broaden the existing knowledge about education and professional development in educational leadership by analysing the characteristics of ‘good’ training programmes according to international theoretical frameworks and to educational leaders’ views. To do so, 100 headteachers of infant, primary and secondary schools were interviewed in the province of Alicante, Spain, and the data were coded and processed using Aquad 6. The results show agreement between the criteria for a good education programme used by the two sources referred to above.
ArcherJ (2005) Study blasts leadership programs. Education Week24(27): 1–18.
2.
AubussonPSteeleFDinhamS. (2007) Action learning in teacher learning community formation: informative or transformative?Teacher Development11(2): 133–148.
3.
AzzamA (2005) The unprepared administrator. Educational Leadership62(8): 88–89.
4.
BangsJFrostD (2012) Teacher self-efficacy, voice and leadership: towards a policy framework for Education International. Available at: http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/lfl/ (accessed 20 October 2013).
BushT (2008) From management to leadership. Semantic or meaningful change?Educational Management Administration & Leadership36(2): 271–288.
8.
BushTDukuNGloverD. (2007) The Zenex ACE: School Leadership Research: First Interim Report. Pretoria: Department of Education.
9.
CityEElmoreRFiarmanS. (2009) Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
10.
Darling-HammondLLaPointeMMeyersonD. (2007) Preparing Principals for a Changing World: Lessons from Effective School Leadership Programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Darling-HammondLMeyersonDLaPointeM. (2010) Preparing Principals for a Changing World: Lessons from Effective School Leadership Programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
DavisSKearneyKSandersN. (2011) The Policies and Practices of Principal Evaluation: A Review of the Literature. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
13.
DayC (2004) A Passion for Teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
DayCHarrisA (2003) Teacher leadership, reflective practice and school improvement. In: LeithwoodKHallingerP (eds) International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp.724–749.
15.
DayCSammonsPHopkinsD. (2010) The Impact of Successful Leadership on Learning Outcomes: 10 Strong Claims about Effective School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services (NCSL).
16.
DayCSammonsPLeithwoodK. (2011) Successful School Leadership: Linking with Learning and Achievement. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
17.
DevosGTuytensM (2006) Improving School Leadership – OECD Review: Background Report for Flanders. Available at: www.oecd.org/edu/schoolleadership (accessed 10 March 2012).
18.
FarkasSJohnsonJDuffettA. (2003) Rolling Up Their Sleeves: Superintendents and Principals Talk about What’s Needed to Fix Public Schools. New York: Public Agenda.
19.
FryBBottomsGO’NeillK (2005) The Principal Internship: How Can We Get It Right?Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
20.
GrissomJLoebS (2011) Triangulating principal effectiveness: how perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal20(10): 1–33.
21.
HallingerP (2011) Three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: a lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly47: 271–306.
22.
HessFMKellyAP (2005) Learning to Lead? What Gets Taught in Principal Preparation Programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Program on Educational Policy and Governance.
23.
HillI (2014) Internationally minded schools as cultural artefacts: implications for school leadership. Journal of Research in International Education13(3): 175–189.
24.
HuberGL (2006) AQUAD 6. Manual del programa para analizar datos cualitativos (ed VerlagIngeborg Huber). Available at: http://www.aquad.de/spa/manual.pdf (accessed 20 March 2012).
25.
JeraldC (2012) Leading for Effective Teaching: How School Systems Can Support Principal Success. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
26.
LeithwoodKDayCSammonsO. (2006) Successful School Leadership: What It Is and How It Influences Pupil Learning (Research Report 800). London: DfES.
27.
LeithwoodKPattenSJantziD (2010) Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 671–706.
28.
LevineA (2005) Educating School Leaders. New York: The Education School Project.
29.
MacBeathJChengYC (eds) (2008) Leadership for Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
30.
MartinGEPapaR (2008) Examining the principal preparation and practice gap. Principal88(1): 12–14.
31.
MayHSupovitzJ (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly47(2): 332–352.
32.
MurphyJT (2006) Some thoughts on rethinking the pre service education of school leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education1(1): 1–3.
33.
MurphyJMoormanHMcCarthyM (2008) A Framework for Rebuilding Initial Certification and Preparation Programs in Educational Leadership: Lessons from Whole-State Reform Initiatives. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
34.
MurphyJSmyleMMayrowetzD. (2009) The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership and Management29(2): 181–214.
OrrMTBarberME (2007) Collaborative leadership preparation: a comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership16: 709–739.
37.
OrrMTOrphanosS (2011) How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: a comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly47(1): 18–70.
38.
OrrMTKingCLaPointeMM (2009) Districts Developing Leaders: Eight Districts’ Lessons on Strategy, Program Approach and Organization to Improve the Quality of Leaders for Local Schools (Report prepared for the Wallace Foundation). Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
39.
PenlingtonCKingtonADayC (2008) Leadership in improving schools: a qualitative perspective. School Leadership & Management28(1): 217–257.
40.
PérezLCynthiaUJohsonJ. (2011) Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: the transformative capacity of authentic inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly47(1): 217–257.
41.
PhillipsJ (2013) State-mandated principal preparation program redesign: impetus for reform or invitation to chaos?Journal of Research on Leadership Education8(2): 139–151.
42.
PounderD (2011) Leader preparation special issue: implications for policy, practice and research. Educational Administration Quarterly47(1): 258–267.
43.
RobertsLMancusoSV (2014) What kind of international school leaders are in demand around the world? A test of differences by region and stability over time. Journal of Research in International Education13(2): 91–105.
44.
RobinsonVMJLloydCARoweKJ (2008) The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly44: 635–674.
45.
SheltonS (2013) Evaluating School Principals: A Legislative Approach. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.
46.
SpillaneJPHealeyKMeslerL (2009) School leaders’ opportunities to learn: a descriptive analysis form a distributed perspective. Educational Review61(4): 407–432.
47.
SupovitzJABuckleyP (2008) The practice and process of instructional leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 24–28 March.
48.
SupovitzJASirinidesPMayH (2010) How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly46(1): 31–56.
49.
VescioVRossDAdamsA (2008) A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching and practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education24(1): 80–91.
50.
YoungMDPetersonGJShortPM (2002) The complexity of substantive reform: a call for interdependence among key stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly38(2): 137–175.
