International accreditation is now a significant yet controversial issue in global higher education. This case study looked at the experience of an intensive English language preparatory programme within a university in Turkey going through an accreditation by a foreign institution, and assessed to what extent the project managed to foster changes in its organisational culture. While it was clear that most felt the accreditation had a significant impact, there was much less clear evidence of changes in organisational culture.
BellJ (2005) Doing your Research Project: A guide for first time researches in Education, Health and Social Science, 4th edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
2.
BellCAYoungsP (2011) Substance and show: understanding responses to teacher education programme accreditation processes. Teaching and Teacher Education27: 298–307.
3.
ÇayirK (2009) Preparing Turkey for the European Union: nationalism, national identity and ‘otherness’ in Turkey’s new textbooks. Journal of Intercultural Studies30(1): 39–55.
4.
ChengHFDörnyeiZ (2007) The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: the case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching1(1): 153–174.
5.
Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA) (n.d.) Accreditation overview. Available at: http://www.cea-accredit.org/accreditation (accessed 8 April 2015).
6.
Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA) (2013) Policies and Procedures. Alexandria: CEA.
7.
Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA) (2014) CEA Standards for English Language Programs and Institutions. Alexandria: CEA.
8.
DeemR (2001) Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: is the local dimension still important?Comparative Education37(1): 7–20.
9.
DeemRBrehonyKJ (2005) Management as ideology: the case of ‘New Managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education31(2): 217–235.
10.
DeemRMokKHLucasL (2008) Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy21: 83–97.
11.
DillDDBeerkensM (2013) Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality. Higher Education65: 341–357.
12.
DimmockCWalkerA (2000) Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: a cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation20(2): 143–160.
EngebretsenEHeggenKEilertsenHA (2012) Accreditation and power: a discourse analysis of a new regime of governance in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research56(4): 401–417.
15.
FertigM (2007) International school accreditation: between a rock and a hard place?Journal of Research in International Education6(3): 333–348.
16.
FrankAKurthDMironowiczI (2012) Accreditation and quality assurance for professional degree programmes: comparing approaches in three European countries. Quality in Higher Education18(1): 75–95.
17.
FullanM (2003) The New Meaning of Educational Change, 3rd edn.London: Routledge.
18.
GuskeyTR (2002) Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice8: 381–391.
19.
HarveyL (2002) Evaluation for what?Teaching in Higher Education7(3): 245–263.
20.
HarveyL (2004) The power of accreditation: views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management26(2): 207–223.
21.
HouAY-C (2011) Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education. Higher Education61(2): 179–191.
22.
MorrisonKTang Fun HeiJ (2002) Testing to destruction: a problem in a small state. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice9(3): 289–317.
RowanBMillerRJ (2007) Organizational strategies for promoting instructional change: implementation dynamics in schools working with comprehensive school reform providers. American Educational Research Journal44: 252–298.
25.
ShahM (2012) Ten years of external quality audit in Australia: evaluating its effectiveness and success. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education37(6): 761–772.
26.
StensakerB (2011) Accreditation of higher education in Europe – moving towards the US model?Journal of Education Policy26(6): 757–769.
27.
StollL (1999) Realising our potential: understanding and developing capacity for lasting improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice10(4): 503–532.
28.
SupovitzJASnyder TaylorB (2005) Systemic education evaluation: evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation26: 204–230.
29.
TamirTWilsonSM (2005) Who should guard the gates? Evidentiary and professional warrants for claiming jurisdiction. Journal of Teacher Education56: 332–342.
30.
Van KemenadeEHardjonoTW (2009) Professionals freaking out: the case of accreditation in Dutch higher education. The TQM Journal21(5): 473–485.
31.
Van KemenadeEHardjonoTW (2010) A critique of the use of self-evaluation in a compulsory accreditation system. Quality in Higher Education16(3): 257–268.
32.
WallaceM (2003) Managing the unmanageable? Coping with complex educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership31: 9–29.
33.
WetteRBarkhuizenG (2009) Teaching the book and educating the person: challenges for university English language teachers in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education29(2): 195–212.
34.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn.London: SAGE.
