Within the framework of schools as communities of learning and practice, the purpose of the research upon which this article is based has been to analyze the perceptions of families with respect to the strengths, weaknesses, and challenges of the European Schools. The findings of the research show that parents value highly the existence of the European Schools. However, they feel that more authentic participation and greater transparency is needed to transform the tendency toward bureaucratization and centralization in the system.
AuerbachS (2007) Visioning parent engagement in urban schools: role constructions of Los Angeles administrators. Journal of School Leadership17(6): 699–735.
2.
Baquedano-LópezPAlexanderRAHernándezSJ (2013) Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: what teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education37(1): 161–194.
3.
BloomfieldMMcNamaraE (2009) Perils and promises: middle-class parental involvement in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal46(4): 974–1004.
4.
Board of Governors (2005) Report to the Board of Governors of Troika Working Group 1, financing burden-sharing and co-financing. The Board of Governors of the European Schools Report, Report no. 2005-D-313-en 2, 25–26April. Brussels: EU.
5.
BolivarJMChrispeelsJH (2010) Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal48(1): 4–38.
6.
CalabreseADrakeCPerezJG. (2004) Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher33(4): 3–12.
7.
ClandininDJConnellyFM (2000) Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
8.
ClarkeZ (2009) Introducing autonomy and altering governance in the European Schools: a review of ongoing reforms. MA in Applied Educational Leadership and Management, Institute of Education – University of London, London.
9.
Cochran-SmithMLytleSL (1999) Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education24: 249–305.
10.
CorbettHDWilsonB (2008) Knowledge is Empowering: Commonwealth Institute for Parental Leadership Fellows’ Involvement and Influence after Training. Lexington, KY: Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence.
11.
Darling-HammondL (1996) The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: research, policy and practice for democratic educational. Educational Researcher6: 5–17.
12.
Darling-HammondL (1997) The Right to Learn. A Blueprint for Creating Schools that Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
13.
Darling-HammondL (2002) Educating a profession for equitable practice. In: Darling-HammondLFrenchJGarcia-LopezSP (eds) Learning to Teach for Social Justice. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 201–216.
14.
DayCSammonsPGuQ (2008) Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work and effectiveness: from integration to synergy. Educational Researcher37(6): 330–342.
15.
DesforgesCAbouchaarA (2003) The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. Research RR433, June. London: DfES Publications.
16.
DesimoneL (2009) Improving impact studies of teacher’s professional development. Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher38(3): 181–199.
17.
DuranRPEisenhartMAEricksonFD. (2006) Standards for reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher35(6): 33–40.
18.
ErcikanKRothW (2006) What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative?Educational Researcher35(5): 14–23.
19.
FanWWilliamsCWolltersCA (2012) Parental involvement and school motivation: similar and differential relations across ethnic groups. The Journal of Educational Research105(1): 21–35.
20.
GholamiKHusuJ (2010) How do teachers reasons about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teacher’s practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education26(8): 1520–1529.
21.
GrayMR (2003) Tense conjugations: translating political values into an educational model: the European Schools. Journal of Research in International Education2(3): 315–330.
22.
GrimshawTSearsC (2008) ‘Where am I from?’ ‘Where do I belong’: the negotiation and maintenance of identity by international school students. Journal of Research in International Education7(3): 259–278.
23.
HargreavesALoLNK (2000) The paradoxical profession: teaching at the turn of the century. Prospects30(2): 167–180.
24.
HarrisALeithwoodKDayC. (2007) Distributed leadership and organizational change: reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change8(4): 337–347.
25.
HendersonAT (2002) No Child Left behind: What’s in it for Parents. Arlington, VA: Parent Leadership Associates.
26.
HendersonAT (2004) The Case for Parent Leadership. Lexington, KY: Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence.
27.
HoneyballM (2005) Report on options for developing the European Schools system. Report European Parliament’s committee on Culture and Education, European Parliament, Luxembourg, June.
28.
HousenASchoonjansEJanssensS. (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring the impact of contextual factors in instructed SLA – the role of language prominence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics49(2): 83–112.
29.
HuberGL (2004) AQUAD 6. Program Manual Qualitative Data Analysis. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.
30.
HuberGLGünterL (2003) AQUAD 6 for WINDOWS. Program Manual Qualitative Data Analysis. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.
31.
HughesSPenningtonJLMakrisS (2012) Translating autoethnography across the AERA standards toward understanding autoethnographic scholarship as empirical research. Educational Researcher41(6): 209–219.
32.
KarstenSDe JongULedouxG. (2006) De positie van ouders en leerlingen in het governancebeleid. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.
33.
Ladson-BillingsGJ (1999) Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: a critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education24: 211–247.
34.
Ladson-BillingsGJ (2009) The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
35.
LaveJWengerE (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Learning in Doing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LaveJWengerE (2001) Legitimate peripheral in communities of practice. In: HarrisonRReeveFHansonA. (eds) Supporting Lifelong Learning: Perspectives on Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp. 111–126.
37.
LawsonMAAlameda-LawsonT (2012) A case study of school-linked collective parent engagement. American Educational Research Journal49(4): 651–684.
38.
LeeJBowenNK (2006) Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal43(2): 193–218.
39.
LeithwoodKDayCSammonsP. (2006) Successful leadership: what it is and how it influences pupil learning. Report for Department of Education and Skills, Report no. 800. Available at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR800.pdf (accessed 7 August 2014).
40.
LinseCT (2011) Creating taxonomies to improve school-home connections with families of culturally and linguistically diverse learners. Education and Urban Society43(6): 651–670.
41.
LopezMEKreiderHCoffmanJ (2005) Intermediary organizations as capacity builders in family educational involvement. Urban Education40(1): 78–105.
42.
RonfeldtMLoebSWyckoffJ (2013) How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal50(1): 4–36.
43.
SavvidesN (2008) The European dimension in education: exploring pupil’s perceptions at three ‘European Schools’. Journal of Research in International Education7(3): 301–324.
44.
SearsC (2011) Integrating multiple identities: narrative in the formation and maintenance of the self in international school students. Journal of Research in International Education10(1): 71–86.
45.
SeitsingerAMFelnerRDBrandS. (2008) A large-scale examination of the nature and efficacy of teachers’ practices to engage parents: assessments, parental contact, and student-level impact. Journal of School Psychology46(4): 477–505.
46.
ShiffmanCD (2013) The juggling act: navigating parent involvement in the welfare reform era. Educational Policy27(1): 64–91.
47.
SpillaneJPMieleDB (2007) Evidence in practice: a framing of the terrain. In: MossPA (ed.) Evidence and Decision Making. The 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 46–73.
48.
SwanD (1996) A Singular Pluralism – The European Schools 1984–1994. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
49.
Van GoolW (2009) How effective is recruitment, induction and development of European School teachers and educational advisers? What HRM has to offer to students and staff. Dissertation for the degree of MBA in educational management, University of Leicester, Leicester.
50.
Weaver-HightowerMB (2008) An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: a call to complexity. Educational Researcher37(3): 153–167.
51.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ZantingAVerloopNVermuntJD (2003) Using interviews and concept maps to access mentor teachers’ practical knowledge. Higher Education46: 195–214.
