As artificial intelligence chatbots enter journalism education, instructors are making choices about whether to allow their use. One perspective that may help them make this decision comes from considering the importance of perceptions of self-efficacy in learning and motivation. Through interviews conducted with journalism students who have been instructed in the use of AI for specific journalism tasks, this study explores how students perceive AI’s impact on their education and their sense of self-efficacy, providing evidence that using AI in journalism education can put barriers between students and the performance accomplishments they need to build confidence.
BanduraA. (1977b). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachaudranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press. (Reprinted in FriedmanH. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health. Academic Press, 1998)
4.
BanduraA. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. Wiley.
5.
BlomJ. N.HeiselbergL.van DalenA.AndersenI. (2025). “I think it’s exciting and frightening at the same time”: Audience sentiments toward the use and labeling of generative AI in journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251385943
de TocquevilleA. (2004). Democracy in America (GoldhammerA., Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1835).
8.
GoniM.TabassumM. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Journalism: Is Bangladesh Ready for it? A Study on Journalism Students in Bangladesh. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 6(4), 209–228.
9.
JonesB.LugerE.JonesR. (2023). Generative AI & journalism: A rapid risk-based review. The University of Edinburgh.
10.
KhalilM.ErE. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04335.
11.
KimY.LeeJ. (2025). Balancing artificial intelligence and human expertise: Ideal fact-checking strategies for hard and soft news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251325875
12.
KvaleS. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
13.
LeeY.-F.HwangG.-J.ChenP.-Y. (2022). Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 70(5), 1843–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8
14.
LeloT. (2023). Fostering artificial intelligence to face misinformation: Discourses and practices of automated fact-checking in Brazil. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(2), 320–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231207963
15.
LewisS. C.ZamithR.BunquinJ. B. A. (2025). Technological hype and AI in journalism: Five functions and why they matter. Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2557994
16.
LuttrellR.WallaceA.McColloughC.LeeJ. (2020). The digital divide: Addressing artificial intelligence in communication education. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695820925286
PavlikJ. V. (2023). Collaborating with chatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
19.
ReaderB.HatcherJ. A. (2012). Foundations of community journalism. Sage.
Saavedra TorresJ.HeathC. E. (2023). Rnmkrs pitchperfector: Artificial intelligence to booster students’ self-efficacy in delivering elevator pitch. Marketing Education Review, 33(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2022.2159435
22.
SchroderC.LehaffJ.VulpiusJ. (2022). News as they know it: Young adults’ information repertoires in the digital media landscape. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1885986
23.
SrinivasaK. G.KurniM.SarithaK. (2022). Harnessing the power of AI to education. In SrinivasaK. G.KurniM.SarithaK (Eds.), Learning, teaching, and assessment methods for contemporary learners: Pedagogy for the digital generation (pp. 311–342). Springer Nature Singapore.
24.
StovalJ. (2015). Writing for the mass media. Pearson.
25.
TangR., (Rongwei)FangY.SunJ.BodeL.VragaE. K. (2025). Automating accuracy: Scalable approaches to correcting disinformation with artificial intelligence on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 102(4), 1044–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251359660
26.
YilmazR.YilmazF. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
27.
YuH. (2023). Reflection on whether chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1181712.
