The study on which this article is based investigated the salience of nationality in adolescents’ self-concept as a function of the diversity of the school context. According to the distinctiveness postulate, people selectively attend to and encode aspects that are most distinctive. We therefore predicted that students in the nationally heterogeneous school environment would mention nationality more frequently in their spontaneous self-concept when questioned than would those in the more homogeneous school setting. Furthermore, we expected minority members to mention nationality more frequently. These predictions were confirmed and implications will be discussed.
BondMHCheungTS (1983) College students’ spontaneous self-concept: the effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology14(2): 153–171.
8.
BroadbentDE (1958) Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
9.
CohenJW (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CondorS (1996) Unimagined community? Some social psychological issues concerning English National Identity. In: BreakwellGMSperiEL (eds) Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, pp. 41–64.
11.
CondorS (2000) Pride and prejudice: identity management in English people’s talk about ‘this country’. Discourse & Society11(2): 175–205.
12.
CondorS (2011) Towards a social psychology of citizenship? Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology21(3): 193–201.
13.
CousinsSD (1989) Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology56(1): 124–131.
14.
EpsteinS (1973) The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist28: 404–416.
15.
EpsteinS (1979) Entwurf einer Integrativen Persönlichkeitstheorie. In: FilippSH (ed.) Selbstkonzept-Forschung: Probleme, Befunde, Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 15–45.
16.
FiskeST (2010) Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18.
HalkoahoJ (2012) Identity-related media consumption a focus on consumers’ relationships with their favorite TV programs. PhD Dissertation, University of Vaasa, Vaasa.
19.
HelmchenA (2005) Die Entstehung der Nationen im Europa der Frühen Neuzeit: ein integraler Ansatz aus humanistischer Sicht, vol. 10. Bern: Peter Lang.
KarimS (2012) The co-existence of globalism and tribalism: a review of the literature. Journal of Research in International Education11(2): 137–151.
22.
KuhnMHMcPartlandTS (1954) An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review19(1): 68–76.
23.
McGuireWJMcGuireCVChildP. (1978) Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(5): 511–520.
24.
MarkusH (1977) Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35(2): 63–78.
25.
NiebergallJA (2010) Promoting positive identity among children in a school curriculum. Master’s Thesis, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
26.
OwensTJ (2003) Self and identity. In: DelamaterJ (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 205–232.
27.
PéportéP (2011) Constructing the Middle Ages: Historiography, Collective Memory and Nation-Building in Luxembourg, vol. 3. Leiden: Brill.
28.
PinquartMSilbereisenRK (2000) Das Selbst im Jugendalter. In: GreveW (ed.) Psychologie des Selbst. Weinheim: Beltz, pp. 75–95.
29.
RumpelE (1991) Kulturelle Identität. Eine Konzeptanalyse im interdisziplinären Raum. Unpublished Diplomarbeit, University of the Saarland, Saarbrücken.
30.
Schmidt-DenterU (2011) Die Deutschen und ihre Migranten: Ergebnisse der europäischen Identitätsstudie. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
