The ontology of the field of international education is described and analysed in terms of singular, regional and generic modes of pedagogized knowledge. In contrast to singular and regional modes of knowledge which synthesize introjection (orientation onto themselves) and projection (orientation towards external contingencies), generic modes concentrate solely on projection onto the demands of the market. Generic knowledge is characterized as a reductive discourse that couples education to the acquisition of skills and competences. International education may be characterized as a region in which singulars (academic disciplines) are brought together in an integrating framework. ‘Internationally minded values’ are identified as constituting an overarching master view that weakens classification between the contents of the field of international education. It is proposed that the International Baccalaureate Learner Profile, as a specification for international education, constitutes pedagogized knowledge in the generic mode. Possible directions for future research in international education are discussed in the context of these contrasting modes of knowledge.
BeckJ (2002) The sacred and the profane in recent struggles to promote Official Pedagogic Identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education23(4): 617–626.
6.
BeckJYoungMFD (2005) The assault on the professions and the restructuring of academic and professional identities: a Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education26(2): 183–197.
BlandfordSShawM (eds) (2001) Managing International Schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
9.
BrayMAdamsonBMasonM (2007) Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods (CERC Studies in Comparative Education 19). Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong: Springer.
10.
BrownCLauderH (2011) The political economy of international schools and social class formation. In: BatesR (ed.) Schooling Internationally: Globalisation, Internationalisation and the Future of International Schools. London: Routledge, 39–58.
CambridgeJ (2002) Global product branding and international education. Journal of Research in International Education1(2): 227–243.
17.
CambridgeJ (2010) The International Baccalaureate diploma programme and the construction of pedagogic identity: a preliminary study. Journal of Research in International Education9(3): 199–213.
18.
CambridgeJ (2011) The IB diploma programme as pedagogic discourse. In: HaydenMThompsonJJ (eds) Taking the IB Diploma Programme Forward. Woodbridge: John Catt Educational, 65–76.
19.
CambridgeJThompsonJJ (2001) A Big Mac and a Coke? Internationalism and globalization as contexts for international education. Unpublished paper. Centre for the study of Education in an International Context, University of Bath, UK.
20.
CambridgeJThompsonJJ (2004) Internationalism and globalization as contexts for international education. Compare34(2): 157–171.
CrossleyMWatsonK (2003) Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context and Difference. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
23.
DohertyC (2010) Re-centring the curricular market: Pedagogic identities in IB Diploma programs in Australia. Paper presented at the International Basil Bernstein Symposium 2010, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, 30 June – 3 July 2010. Available at: http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/221759/Doherty-RT.pdf (accessed 7 March 2011).
24.
HartleyD (2003) The instrumentalisation of the expressive in education. British Journal of Educational Studies51(1): 6–19.
25.
HaydenMC (2006) Introduction to International Education. London: Sage.
26.
HaydenMCThompsonJJ (1995) International schools and international education: a relationship reviewed. Oxford Review of Education21(3): 327–345.
27.
HernesT (2004) Studying composite boundaries: a framework of analysis. Human Relations57(1): 9–29.
28.
IB (2006) IB Learner Profile Booklet. Cardiff: International Baccalaureate Organization.
LaveJ (2003) Producing the future: getting to be British. Antipode35(3): 492–511.
34.
LeachRJ (1969) International Schools and Their Role in the Field of International Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
35.
LoweJ (1998) International and comparative education. International Schools JournalXVII(2): 18–21.
36.
LynchC (1999) The promise and problems of internationalism. Global Governance5(1): 83–102.
37.
MatthewsM (1988) The ethos of international schools. MSc thesis, University of Oxford.
38.
McCullochG (2002) ‘Disciplines contributing to education’? Educational studies and the disciplines. British Journal of Educational Studies50(1): 100–119.
39.
MesserDWolterSC (2007) Are student exchange programs worth it?Higher Education54(5): 647–663.
40.
MiddletonS (2006) Research assessment as a pedagogical device: a Bernsteinian exploration of its impact on New Zealand’s subject/s of education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Adelaide, 27–29 November 2006.
41.
MitchellK (2003) Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: from the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers28(4): 387–403.
42.
ParkerWC (2011) ‘International education’ in US public schools. Globalisation, Societies and Education9(3–4): 487–501.
43.
PennycookA (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
44.
PetersonADC (1977) Applied comparative education: the International Baccalaureate: a case study. Comparative Education13(2): 77–80.
45.
PhillipsDSchweisfurthM (2006) Comparative and International Education: An Introduction to Theory, Method and Practice. New York: Continuum.
46.
PikeG (2000) Global education and national identity: in pursuit of meaning. Theory into Practice39(2): 64–73.
47.
PiperBDryden-PetersonSKimY-S (2006) International Education for the Millennium: Toward Access, Equity and Quality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review. (Reprint Series No. 42.)
48.
RawlingsF (2000) Abstract of doctoral thesis: globalization, curriculum and international communities: a case study of the United World College of the Atlantic. International Journal of Educational Development20(4): 365–366.
49.
ResnikJ (2008) The construction of the global worker through international education. In: ResnikJ (ed.) The Production of Educational Knowledge in the Global Era. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 147–67.
50.
ResnikJ (2009) Multicultural education – good for business but not for the state? The IB curriculum and global capitalism. British Journal of Educational Studies57(3): 217–244.
51.
RitzerG (1993) The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
52.
ScottD (2008) Critical Essays on Major Curriculum Theorists. London: Routledge.
53.
SiskinLS (1994) Realms of Knowledge: Academic Departments in Secondary Schools. London: Falmer Press.
54.
SklairL (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
TarcP (2009a) Global Dreams, Enduring Tensions: International Baccalaureate in a Changing World. New York: Peter Lang.
56.
TarcP (2009b) What is the ‘international’ in the International Baccalaureate? Three structuring tensions of the early years (1962–1973). Journal of Research in International Education8(3) 235–261.
57.
ThompsonJJ (1998) Towards a model for international education. In: HaydenMCThompsonJJ (eds) International Education: Principles and Practice. London: Kogan Page, 276–290.
58.
WalfordG (2002) Classification and framing of the curriculum in Evangelical Christian and Muslim schools in England and the Netherlands. Educational Studies28(4): 404–419.
59.
WatersJL (2006) Emergent geographies of international education and social exclusion. Antipode38(5): 1046–1068.
60.
WilsonDN (1994) Comparative and international education: fraternal or Siamese twins? A preliminary genealogy of our twin fields. Comparative Education Review38(4): 449–486.
61.
YoungMFD (2008) Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
62.
ZawSK (1996) Locke and multiculturalism: toleration, relativism and reason. In: FullinwiderRK (ed.) Public Education in a Multicultural Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–155.
