This qualitative study based on Gee’s (2001) identity theory examined and compared how American and Chinese middle school students develop identities towards science, culture and technology in an intercultural web-assisted scientific inquiry project. Through analysis of online discussions, videoconferences, interviews, surveys and fieldnotes, we explored how students shaped and reshaped their identities throughout scientific inquiry learning and intercultural collaborative activities. In examining identity development during scientific investigation, we offer insights into the intercultural learning context and suggest ways of facilitating identity formation, which can inform such collaborations in the future.
Antonenko P., Udin V. ( 2004) International collaboration in open source software development: implications for enhancing educational practice. In: G Richards (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 1058-1061. Available at: http://www.editlib.org/p/1008.
2.
Antonenko P., Toy S., and Niederhauser D. ( 2004) Modular object-oriented dynamic learning environment: what open source has to offer. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology , Chicago, IL, October.
3.
Becker ML, Congalton RG, Budd R., and Fried A. ( 1998) A GLOBE collaboration to develop land cover data collection and analysis protocols. Journal of Science Education and Technology7(1): 85-96.
4.
Brown BA ( 2004) Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching41(8): 810-834.
5.
Brown BA, Reveles JM, and Kelly GJ ( 2005) Scientific literacy and discursive identity: a theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education89: 779-802.
6.
Celuch K., Black G., and Warthan B. ( 2009) Student self-identity as a critical thinker: the influence of attitudes, attitude strength, and normative beliefs. Journal of Marketing Education31(1): 31-39.
7.
Chen R., Bennett S., and Maton K. ( 2007) The online acculturation of Chinese student ‘sojourners’ . In: C Montgomerie, J Seale (eds) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 2744-2752.
8.
Fail H., Thompson JJ, and Walker G. ( 2004) Belonging, identity and third culture kids. Journal of Research in International Education3(3): 319-338.
9.
Fields DA ( 2006) Identities and astronomy camp: how individual campers make meaning of science experiences. Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Learning Sciences. Bloomington, IN, 920-921.
10.
Gee JP ( 1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
11.
Gee JP ( 2001) Identity as an analytic lens for research in education . Review of Research in Education25: 99-125.
12.
Gee JP ( 2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning. New York: Palgrave.
13.
Gee JP ( 2005) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method . New York: Routledge.
14.
Globe (1997) Teachers’ Guide: The GLOBE Program, global learning and observation to benefit the environment . Available at: http://www.globe.gov (accessed 12 November 2007).
15.
Hamlen K. ( 2008) Children’s preferred learning strategies in video games: a preliminary investigation. In: K McFerrin et al. (eds) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 1096-1098.
16.
Heyward M. ( 2002) From international to intercultural: redefining the international school for a globalized world. Journal of Research in International Education1(1): 9-32.
17.
Kelly GJ ( 2007) Discourse in science classrooms. In: SK Abell, NG Lederman (eds) Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 443-469.
18.
Kozoll RH, Osborne MD ( 2004) Finding meaning in science: lifeworld, identity, and self . Science Education88(2): 157-181.
19.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG ( 1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
20.
Luehmann LA, Markowitz D. ( 2007) Science teachers’ benefits of an out-of-school enrichment programme: identity needs and university affordances. International Journal of Science Education29(9): 1133-1161.
21.
Merchant G. ( 2006) Identity, social networks and online communication. E-learning, 3(2): 235-244.
22.
O’Dowd R. ( 2003) Understanding ‘the other side’: a qualitative analysis of intercultural learning in a Spanish- English email exchange. Language Learning and Technology7(2): 118-144.
23.
Olitsky S. ( 2006) Structure, agency, and the development of students’ identities as learners. Cultural Studies of Science Education1: 745-766.
24.
Palmer JD ( 2007) Who is the authentic Korean American? Korean-born Korean American high school students’ negotiation of ascribed and achieved identities. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education6(4): 277-298.
25.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009) 21st Century Skills Framework Overviews. Available at: http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/p21_framework_definitions_052909.pdf (accessed 9 October 2009).
26.
Public School Review (2007) Horace W. Porter School review. Available at: http://www.publicschoolreview.com (accessed 8 October 2007).
27.
Roth WM, Roychoudhury A. ( 2006) The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. Philosophy of the Social Sciences30(5): 503-534.
28.
Sfard A., Prusak A. ( 2005) Telling identities: in search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher34(4): 14-22.
29.
Shen ZF ( 2005) A research on the professional role-identity of Shanghai primary and middle school teachers. Psychological Science28(3): 723-726.
30.
Tu CH ( 2001) How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of an online learning environment. Educational Media International38(1): 45-60.
31.
Uehara A. ( 1986) The nature of American student re-entry adjustment and perceptions of the sojourner experience. International Journal of Intercultural Relations10(4): 415-38.
32.
Wang CL ( 1999) National identity and the controversies regarding the new subject: ‘knowing Taiwan’ in the R.O.C. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
33.
Wells G. ( 2000) Dialogic inquiry in education: building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In: CD Lee, P Smagorinsky (eds) Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research: Constructing Meaning through Collaborative Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 51-85.
34.
Wenger E. ( 1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity . New York: Cambridge University Press.
