The variable and unpredictable marine environment will not only inevitably cause the double pendulum phenomenon of shipboard boom crane lifting system, but also directly threaten the safe and efficient lifting operation. In this paper, in view of the above problems, firstly, the mathematical model of ocean random wind is established, and the mathematical model of wave is established by using the Pierson-Moskowitz (PM) method, so as to obtain an environmental disturbance model of the shipboard boom crane in this way. Then, the Lagrange equation is used to establish the dynamic equation of the double pendulum for the multi-point collaborative lifting of shipboard boom crane under the influence of roll, pitch, and environmental disturbance. After that, a fractional-order PID (FOPID) constant tension optimization control (CTOC) method based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is proposed, which is used to optimize the anti-swing cable tension. At the same time, a nonlinear hierarchical sliding mode controller (HSMC) with CTOC is designed, and the stability of the HSMC with CTOC is proved by the Lyapunov stability theorem and Barbalat’s lemma. Finally, the experimental results show that the FOPID can reduce the tension fluctuation range of the anti-swing cables by more than 63.5%, and the HSMC with CTOC method can reduce the out-of-plane angle swing of the hook and payload by more than 85.5% and 87.3%, respectively, as well as the in-plane angle swing by more than 80.9% and 91.8%, respectively.
ZhangWZhangJZhangT. Fast simulation method for ocean wave base on ocean wave spectrum and improved gerstner model with GPU. In: 2016 International conference on communication, image and signal processing (CCISP 2016), Dubai, UAE, 18–20 November 2016. IOP Publishing.
2.
XueSXuGXieW, et al. Characteristics of freak wave and its interaction with marine structures: a review. Ocean Eng2023; 287: 115764.
3.
FuJHuangFGaoW, et al. A research review on wave modeling and simulation methods in marine environment. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), Tianjin, China, 04–07 August 2019. New York: IEEE.
4.
ZhangJZhaoSZhangT, et al. Improved method about particle and wave spectrum modeling based on the detection line. In: 4th international conference on applied materials and manufacturing technology, Nanchang, China, 25–27 May 2018. IOP Publishing.
5.
LiangYLiRLiuT, et al. An enhanced coupling optimal trajectory planning for bridge cranes. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2024; 238(6): 2007–2017.
6.
FanBCaoZWangC, et al. A novel trajectory online planning and under-actuated control method on positioning and anti-swing for bridge cranes. J Vib Control2023; 29(21-22): 5184–5194.
7.
YangYYeXWenB, et al. Adaptive control design for uncertain underactuated cranes with nonsmooth input nonlinearities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2022; 53(2): 1074–1083.
8.
WuQOuyangHXiH.Adaptive nonlinear control for 4-DOF ship-mounted rotary cranes. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2023; 33(3): 1957–1972.
9.
Al-FadhliAKhorshidE.A smooth optimized input shaping method for two-dimensional crane systems using Bezier curves. Meas Control2021; 43(11): 2512–2524.
10.
TangWMaRWangW, et al. Optimization-based input-shaping swing control of overhead cranes. Appl Sci2023; 13(17): 9637.
11.
AbdullahiAMHamzaMFMohammedZ, et al. Distributed delay adaptive output-based command shaping for different cable lengths of double-pendulum overhead cranes. Int J Dyn Control2024; 12(5): 1466–1476.
12.
XiaJOuyangH.Chattering free sliding mode controller design for underactuated tower cranes with uncertain disturbance. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2023; 71(5): 4963–4975.
13.
YaoXChenHLiuY, et al. Tracking approach of double pendulum cranes with variable rope lengths using sliding mode technique. ISA Trans2023; 136: 152–161.
14.
NguyenNPOhHMoonJ.Continuous integral-type sliding mode tracking control of under-actuated cranes: theory and experiments. Nonlinear Dyn2024; 112(18): 16295–16313.
15.
WangZYangLOuyangH, et al. Global robust control of overhead cranes with distributed mass beams considering model uncertainty and external disturbance. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 214: 111378.
16.
Miranda-ColoradoR.Robust observer-based anti-swing control of 2D-crane systems with load hoisting-lowering. Nonlinear Dyn2021; 104(4): 3581–3596.
17.
OuyangHXuXZhangG.Energy-shaping-based nonlinear controller design for rotary cranes with double-pendulum effect considering actuator saturation. Autom Constr2020; 111(3): 103054.
18.
ZhangSHeXZhuH, et al. PID-like coupling control of underactuated overhead cranes with input constraints. Mech Syst Signal Process 2022; 178: 109274.
19.
MasoudZAlhazzaKAbu-NadaE, et al. A hybrid command-shaper for double-pendulum overhead cranes. J Vib Control2014; 20(1): 24–37.
20.
RehmanSMFUMohamedZHusainAR, et al. Adaptive input shaper for payload swing control of a 5-DOF tower crane with parameter uncertainties and obstacle avoidance. Autom Constr2023; 154: 104963.
21.
WangTZhouJWuZ, et al. A time-varying PD sliding mode control method for the container crane based on a radial-spring damper. Electronics2022; 11(21): 3543.
22.
JaafarHIMohamedZAhmadMA, et al. Control of an underactuated double-pendulum overhead crane using improved model reference command shaping: design, simulation and experiment. Mech Syst Signal Process 2021; 151: 107358.
23.
TianZYuLOuyangH, et al. Transportation and swing reduction for double-pendulum tower cranes using partial enhanced-coupling nonlinear controller with initial saturation. ISA Trans2021; 112: 122–136.
24.
KangXChaiLLiuH.Anti-swing and positioning for double-pendulum tower cranes using improved active disturbance rejection controller. Int J Control Autom Syst2023; 21(4): 1210–1221.
25.
GuoQChaiLLiuH.Anti-swing sliding mode control of three-dimensional double pendulum overhead cranes based on extended state observer. Nonlinear Dyn2023; 111(1): 391–410.
26.
LiFQianYWuS.A self-adapting trajectory tracking control for double-pendulum marine tower crane considering constraint dead zone against seawave disturbances. Ocean Eng2024; 309: 118358.
27.
WangJLiuKWangS, et al. Dynamic analysis and experiment of underactuated double-pendulum anti-swing device for ship-mounted jib cranes. Pol Marit Res2022; 29(4): 145–154.
28.
LiZMaXLiY.Nonlinear partially saturated control of a double pendulum offshore crane based on fractional-order disturbance observer. Autom Constr2022; 137: 104212.
29.
YangLWangKMaX, et al. Nonlinear adaptive control for 3-D ship-mounted cranes with double-pendulum effect without velocity feedback. In: 2024 43rd Chinese control conference (CCC), Kunming, China, 28–31 July 2024. New York: IEEE.
30.
SunMJiCLuanT, et al. LQR pendulation reduction control of ship-mounted crane based on improved grey wolf optimization algorithm. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2023; 24(3): 395–407.
31.
QianYZhangHHuD.Finite-time neural network-based hierarchical sliding mode antiswing control for underactuated dual ship-mounted cranes with unmatched sea wave disturbances suppression. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2023; 35(9): 12396–12408.
32.
ZanjaniMSMobayenS.Event-triggered global sliding mode controller design for anti-sway control of offshore container cranes. Ocean Eng2023; 268: 113472.
33.
RenZVermaASAtaeiB, et al. Model-free anti-swing control of complex-shaped payload with offshore floating cranes and a large number of lift wires. Ocean Eng2021; 228: 108868.
34.
YuanGHHuntBRGrebogiC, et al. Design and control of shipboard cranes. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1997 design engineering technical conferences. Volume 1D:16th Biennial conference on mechanical vibration and noise, Sacramento, CA, 14–17 September 1997. New York: ASME.
35.
ParkerGGrazianoMLebanF, et al. Reducing crane payload swing using a rider block tagline control system. In: OCEANS 2007-Europe, Aberdeen, UK, 18–21 June 2007. New York: IEEE.
36.
WangJWangSChenH, et al. Dynamic modeling and analysis of the telescopic sleeve antiswing device for shipboard cranes. Math Probl Eng2021; 2021: 1–15.
37.
VietLD.Crane sway reduction using Coriolis force produced by radial spring and damper. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29(3): 973–979.
38.
WangSJinGLiJ, et al. Active damping methods to suppress the payload swing by a 3-degree of freedom cable-driven parallel robot. Asian J Control2023; 25(6): 4796–4812.
SunMZhaoTWangS, et al. Dynamic analysis and experimental research on slender-beam payload swing suppression for marine crane retrofitted a multi-tagline parallel anti-swing system. Ocean Eng2024; 296: 116922.
41.
HuYTaoLLvW.Anti-pendulation analysis of parallel wave compensation systems. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2016; 230(1): 177–186.
42.
JinGSunYChengH, et al. Dynamic modeling and control of hydraulic driven payload anti-swing system for shipborne cranes. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2024; 238(1): 137–152.
43.
Mohd TumariMZAhmadMASuidMH, et al. An improved marine predators algorithm tuned data-driven multiple-node hormone regulation neuroendocrine-PID controller for multi-input–multi-output gantry crane system. J Low Freq Noise2023; 42(4): 1666–1698.
44.
ChangLZhuZRenM. Simulation research on motion control system of offshore anti-rolling crane based on fuzzy PID control. In: International conference on mechatronic engineering and artificial intelligence (MEAI 2023), Shenyang, China, 2023. SPIE.
45.
ZhangYLiuLHeD.Application of variable universe fuzzy PID controller based on ISSA in bridge crane control. Electronics2024; 13(17): 3534.
46.
ChenSXiePLiaoJ, et al. NMPC-PID control of secondary regulated active heave compensation system for offshore crane. Ocean Eng2023; 287: 115902.
47.
ChenSXiePLiaoJ.Cascade NMPC-PID control strategy of active heave compensation system for ship-mounted offshore crane. Ocean Eng2024; 302: 117648.
Martinez-VazquezP.Wind-induced vibrations of structures using design spectra. Int J Adv Struct Eng2016; 8(4): 379–389.
50.
EteleJFusinaG.Overview of wind gust modelling with application to autonomous low-level UAV control, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Carelton University, Ottawa, Canada, 2006.
51.
NestegårdARonæssMHagenØ, et al. New DNV recommended practice DNV-RP-C205 on environmental conditions and environmental loads. In: The sixteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, San Francisco, California, USA, May 28–June 2, 2006.
52.
MengFLiuSLiuK.Design of an optimal fractional order PID for constant tension control system. IEEE Access2020; 8: 58933–58939.
53.
PodlubnyI.Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.
54.
XueBZhangMBrowneWN.Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach. IEEE Trans Cybern2012; 43(6): 1656–1671.
55.
LoveL.Compensation of wave-induced motion and force phenomena for ship-based high performance robotic and human amplifying systems, 2003. United States.
