A benchmark study on the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of alternative fuels in gulet-type sailing yachts

Abstract

Gulet-type yachts are one of the symbols of maritime culture with their unique hull forms and schooner or ketch-type riggings. In parallel with the targets aiming for decarbonization in the maritime industry, energy efficiency and emission control are on the agenda for these types of yachts. Driven by this motivation, a novel benchmark study for the gulet-type yachts is conducted to evaluate the energy efficiency and environmental impacts associated with the adoption of LNG or methanol as primary fuel alternatives to MDO. The benchmark study is constructed in two steps: Presenting the design and propulsion characteristics of existing gulets, followed by a detailed analysis of the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of using alternative fuels. Therefore, 57 gulets with round and transom sterns whose hull forms are analyzed, modeled and general characteristics are presented. After modeling, the resistance and effective power of hull forms are predicted using the Holtrop-Mennen method and CFD. The flow characteristics around the hulls are obtained and the results are validated using the previous experimental studies in the first step. Then, installed and computed engine capacities are compared, and the Annual Emission Ratio and Energy Efficiency Index (EEI) are calculated for environmental impact assessments. Finally, the applicability of using LNG or MeOH-fueled propulsion systems for gulet-type yachts is discussed considering energy efficiency and design. According to the results, transitioning to alternative fuels can increase the Energy Efficiency Index of gulet-type yachts by over 20%.

Keywords

Gulet energy efficiency emission LNG methanol

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tupper

(ed.). Introduction to naval architecture. 5th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013.

Turan

Bİ

. Guideline for preliminary design phase of trawler type yachts. Mar Sci Technol Bull 2023; 12(3): 312–321.

IMO. Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 Executive-Summary, 2020.

IMO. Resolution MEPC.377(80) - 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. MEPC 80/17/Add.1, 2023.

IMO. MARPOL VI Amendments Resolution MEPC 251(66), 2014.

IMO. Mid- and long-term GHG reduction measures - MEPC 76/15/Add. 2, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Mid–and-long-term-GHG-reduction-measures.aspx#:~:text=Work%20Plan,Programme%20of%20follow%2Dup%20actions. (2021, accessed 25 October 2023).

Bucknall

. Marine propulsion using battery power. In: Shipping in Changing Climates Conference, Newcastle, 10–11 November 2016.

IMO. Improving the energy efficiency of ships, https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Improving%20the%20energy%20efficiency%20of%20ships.aspx (2023, accessed 25 October 2023).

Boat International. Top 10 largest sailing yachts in the world, https://www.boatinternational.com/yachts/the-register/top-largest-sailing-yachts–25057 (2023, accessed 25 October 2023).

10.

MTU. Rolls-Royce and Lürssen to focus on methanol propulsion for large yachts, 2023, https://www.mtu-solutions.com/na/en/pressreleases/2022/rolls-royce-and-luerssen-to-focus-on-methanol-propulsion-for-lar.html (2023, accessed 7 February 2024).

11.

Lloyd’s Register. LR approves first methanol fuel cell system to be installed on an Italian yacht, https://www.lr.org/en/about-us/press-listing/press-release/lr-approves-first-methanol-fuel-cell-system-to-be-installed-on-an-italian-yacht/ (2023, accessed 26 October 2023).

12.

RR. LNG-fueled yacht - Crystal Blue - Blue Shadow, https://boatinternational.com/yachts/news/rolls-royce-reveals-hybrid-yacht-concept-crystal-blue–35435 (2017, accessed 26 October 2023).

13.

Turan Bİ. Design framework for sail & rigging parameters of Bodrum gulets: comparison of schooner and ketch configurations. Ships Offshore Struct 2023; 18(11): 1582–1593.

14.

Kükner

Türk Tipi Yelkenli Gulet. Gemi ve Deniz Teknolojisi 2009; 181(225): 5–12.

15.

Turan

Akman

Modeling and comparison of Bodrum gulets’ hull forms with round and transom sterns. J ETA Marit Sci 2021; 9(2): 120–129.

16.

Nutku

Küçük

Türk Kıyı Tekneleri I: Çektirme, Gulet. İstanbul: İTÜ, 1963.

17.

Kükner

Aydin

Bal

, et al. Türk Tipi Guletlerin İncelenmesi ve Form Optimizasyonu. 106M086, TUBITAK, 2009.

18.

Gammon

Kukner

Alkan

A Mathematical Model for Bodrum Type Gulet Vessel’s Series. 2005.

19.

Aydin

Development of a systematic series of gulet hull forms with cruiser stern. Ocean Eng 2013; 58: 180–191.

20.

Cakici

Aydin

Effects of hull form parameters on seakeeping for YTU gulet series with cruiser stern. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 2014; 6(3): 700–714.

21.

Akman

Turan

Bİ

. Energy-efficient yacht design: an investigation on the environmental impacts of engine selection for bodrum gulets. In: Proceedings of the 2022 international symposium on energy management and sustainability, pp.463–472. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

22.

Fossati

Diana

Principi di Funzionamento di Un’Imbarcazione a Vela. Milano: Schönenfeld & Ziegler, 2004.

23.

Turan

Bİ

Akman

Özbey

. Design comparison of Bodrum gulets and Tırhandils. In: 2nd international congress on ship and marine technology, İstanbul, 2021.

24.

Birk

Fundamentals of ship hydrodynamics: fluid mechanics, ship resistance and propulsion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2019.

25.

Holtrop

Mennen

GGJ

. An approximate power prediction method. ISP 1982; 29(335): 166–170.

26.

MAN Energy Solutions. Basic principles of ship propulsion, https://www.man-es.com/docs/default-source/document-sync-archive/basic-principles-of-ship-propulsion-eng.pdf?sfvrsn=48fc05b5_3 (2018, accessed 11 January 2023).

27.

Blount

Fox

DL.

Small-craft power prediction. Marine Technol 1976; 13(01): 120–145.

28.

ITTC. Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications. 7.5–03, 02–03, 2011.

29.

ITTC. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. 7.5–03, 02–03, 2014.

30.

IMO. Resolution MEPC.376(80)-Guidelines on Life Cycle GHG Intensity of Marine Fuels. 376(80), 2023.

31.

MEPC. 308(73). Guidelines on The Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for New Ships.

32.

Woodyard

. Pounder’s marine diesel engines and gas turbines, pp.48–63.

33.

MAN. Using methanol fuel in the MAN B&W ME-LGI series, https://www.man-es.com/docs/default-source/document-sync-archive/b-w-me-lgi-engines-liquid-gas-injection-methanol-and-lpg-eng.pdf?sfvrsn=c4f46ed1_8 (2014, accessed 7 February 2024).

34.

Pavlenko

Comer

Zhou

, et al. The climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel. 2020.

35.

Issa

Ibrahim

Hosni

, et al. Effects of low charge and environmental conditions on diesel generators operation. Eng 2020; 1(2): 137–152.

36.

Tufte

Impacts of Low Load Operation of Modern Four-Stroke Diesel Engines in Generator Configuration. 2014.

37.

Akman

A techno-environmental and energy efficiency investigation of marine dual-fuel engines. Mar Sci Technol Bull 2023; 12(2): 128–141.

38.

Ship & Bunker. Bunker Prices, https://shipandbunker.com/prices (2023, accessed 11 May 2023).

39.

Fasihi

Breyer

Global production potential of green methanol based on variable renewable electricity. Energy Environ Sci 2024; 17(10): 3503–3522.

40.

MAN. Managing methane slip, https://www.man-es.com/marine/campaigns/methane-slip (2021, accessed 7 February 2024).

41.

Taghi Zarrinkolah

Hosseini

. Methane slip reduction of conventional dual-fuel natural gas diesel engine using direct fuel injection management and alternative combustion modes. Fuel 2023; 331: 125775.

42.

Schuller

Kupferschmid

Hengstler

, et al. Life cycle GHG emission study on the use of LNG as marine fuel. Stuttgart: Hinkstep.

43.

Ushakov

Stenersen

Einang

PM.

Methane slip from gas fuelled ships: a comprehensive summary based on measurement data. J Mar Sci Technol 2019; 24(4): 1308–1325.

44.

Al-Breiki

Bicer

Comparative life cycle assessment of sustainable energy carriers including production, storage, overseas transport and utilization. J Clean Prod 2021; 279: 123481.

45.

Bureau Veritas. An Inside Look at Methanol as Fuel, https://marine-offshore.bureauveritas.com/inside-look-methanol-fuel (2023, accessed 11 May 2023).

46.

Harris

Conlan

Simon

. Review of LNG and methanol marine fuel options. IGP Energy. https://igpmethanol.com/igpmwp/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Review-of-LNG-and-Methanol-Marine-Fuel-Options-Exec-Summ-03-10-2022.pdf (2022, accessed 7 February 2024).