Deformation measurement of hull structure is of great significance for enhancing the quality of shipbuilding. In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method based on RGB-D images is presented for non-structural surface of a stiffened hull plate. The algorithm for object surface region nodes (OSRN) is proposed to extract the features of point clouds and generate higher-order fitting surface model. Firstly, random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm and least square method are applied to eliminate the noise of point clouds. Spatial position of targets in RGB image and singular value decomposition (SVD) are utilized to accomplish the registration of point clouds from multiple camera views. Then, the point clouds data are clustered and fused to fit the quadric surface. On this basis, the 3D surface model is reconstructed through higher-order panel element. Two comparative experiments, including the measurements via the RGB-D camera and 3D Laser Scanner, are carried out to verify the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method.
GeorgiadisDGSamuelidesMS.Stochastic geometric imperfections of plate elements and their impact on the probabilistic ultimate strength assessment of plates and hull-girders. Mar Struct2021; 76: 102920.
2.
FunnellWRJ. Image processing applied to the interactive analysis of interferometric fringes. Appl Opt1981; 20: 3245–3250.
3.
JohannessenKWessel JohnsenLG.Practical fiber optic sensor for measuring large mechanical deformations. Proc SPIE1994; 2360: 368–371. Glasgow: SPIE.
4.
KageyamaKKimparaISuzukiT, et al. Smart marine structures: an approach to the monitoring of ship structures with fiber-optic sensors. Smart Mater Struct1998; 7: 472–478.
5.
MochalovAVKazantsevAV.Use of ring laser units for measurement of moving object deformations. Proc SPIE2002; 4680: 85–92. St Petersburg: SPIE.
6.
WuWChenSQinS.Online estimation of ship dynamic flexure model parameters for transfer alignment. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2013; 21: 1666–1678.
LiuJWLiangXHTangZZ.Videogrammetric system for dynamic deformation measurement during metal sheet welding processes. Opt Eng2010; 49: 033601.
9.
WeiYDingZHuangH, et al. A non-contact measurement method of ship block using image-based 3D reconstruction technology. Ocean Eng2019; 178: 463–475.
10.
ZhangXYLoaderCSchillingS, et al. 3D Laser Scanning for Thickness Measurements of Hull Structures. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2021 40th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 2021. New York, NY: ASME.
11.
LiJCMiaoZJLiuXQ, et al. 3D reconstruction based on stereovision and texture mapping. In: Proceedings of the PCV 2010: photogrammetric computer vision and image analysis, pt II 2010, pp.1–6. France, FR: ISPRS.
12.
XuHHouJYuL, et al. 3D reconstruction system for collaborative scanning based on multiple RGB-D cameras. Pattern Recognit Lett2019; 128: 505–512.
13.
NguyenTTSlaughterDCMaxN, et al. Structured Light-based 3D reconstruction system for plants. Sensors2015; 15: 18587–18612.
14.
NewcombeRALovegroveSJDavisonAJ.DTAM: dense tracking and mapping in real-time. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, Barcelona, Spain, 2011, pp.2320–2327. New York, NY: IEEE.
15.
NewcombeRAIzadiSHilligesO, et al. KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on mixed & augmented reality, 2012, pp.127–136. New York, NY: IEEE.
16.
WhelanTSalas-MorenoRFGlockerB, et al. ElasticFusion: real-time dense SLAM and light source estimation. Int J Rob Res2016; 35: 1697–1716.
17.
ChenYHNgCTWangYZ.Data reduction in integrated reverse engineering and rapid prototyping. Int J Comput Integr Manuf1999; 12: 97–103.
18.
ZuoQHeKSunZ, et al. A novel incremental bending process of complex curved sheet metal. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. Volume 2: Advanced manufacturing, Phoenix, Arizona, 11–17 November 2016, p.V002T02 A052. New York, NY: ASME.
19.
LeeKHWooHSukT.Point data reduction using 3D grids. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2001; 18: 201–210.
20.
Leal NarváezENarváezN.Point cloud denoising using robust principal component analysis. In: Proceedings of the Grapp: first international conference on computer graphics theory & applications, 2006. Setubal: GRAPP.
21.
AbbasMALichtiDDChongAK, et al. Improvements to the accuracy of prototype ship models measurement method using terrestrial laser scanner. Measurement2017; 100: 301–310.
22.
ChenCLiY.Ship berthing information extraction system using three-dimensional light detection and ranging data. J Mar Sci Eng2021; 9: 747.
23.
DesbrunMMeyerMSchröderP, et al. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer graphics & interactive techniques, 1999, pp.317–324. Los Angeles, LA: SIGGRAPH.
GhahremaniMWilliamsKCorkeF, et al. Direct and accurate feature extraction from 3D point clouds of plants using RANSAC. Comput Electron Agric2021; 187: 106240.
26.
ArunKSHuangTSBlosteinSD.Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell1987; 9: 698–700.
27.
ScottGLLonguet-HigginsHC.An algorithm for associating the features of two images. Proc Royal Soc B1991; 244: 21–26.
28.
PiluM.A direct method for stereo correspondence based on singular value decomposition. In: Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 1993, pp.261-266. New York, NY: IEEE.
29.
ReppergerDWPinkusARFarrisKA, et al. Investigation of image fusion procedures using optimal registration and SVD algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2009 national aerospace & electronics conference (NAECON) IEEE, 2009. New York, NY: IEEE.
30.
YaseinMSAgathoklisP.An improved algorithm for image registration using robust feature extraction. In: Conference on electrical & computer engineering IEEE, 2005. New York, NY: IEEE.
