The objective of this research is to analyse the degree of implementation of the six dimensions of Marketing Promotion in shipbuilding sector and the relationship between this degree and performance. The combined analysis of all Marketing Promotion dimensions identifies an improvement in performance of the companies that have made the greatest effort in terms of Promotion, being this influence mainly notable among Asian competitors. The specific study of each dimension detects similar efforts conducted by shipyards in terms of Personal sale, Sales promotion and Sponsorship, while it reveals differences in the use of Advertising, Public Relations and Direct Marketing techniques.
GundlachGT. The American marketing association’s 2004 definition of marketing: perspectives on its implications for scholarship and the role and responsibility of marketing in society. J Public Policy Mark2007; 26: 243–250.
6.
KhanMT. The concept of‘marketing mix’and its elements (a conceptual review paper). Int J Inf Bus Manag2014; 6: 95.
7.
KambojS. Marketing capabilities and firm performance: literature review and future research agenda. Int J Prod Perform Manag2015; 64: 1041–1067.
8.
BhattacharyaCBKorschunD. Stakeholder marketing: beyond the four Ps and the customer. J Public Policy Mark2008; 27: 113–116.
9.
BarrettHWeinsteinA. Corporate entrepreneurship, the marketing mix, and business performance. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Academy of marketing science (AMS) annual conference. New York: Springer, 2015, pp.144–150.
10.
ZhouJMavondoFTSaundersSG. The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence. Ind Mark Manag2019; 83: 31–41.
11.
KircaAHRandhawaPTalayMB, et al. The interactive effects of product and brand portfolio strategies on brand performance: longitudinal evidence from the U.S. automotive industry. Int J Res Mark2020; 37(2): 421–439.
12.
SalonenAGabrielssonMAl-ObaidiZ. Systems sales as a competitive response to the Asian challenge: case of a global ship power supplier. Ind Mark Manag2006; 35: 740–750.
13.
CostaGAABrinatiMAHinoCM.Contribution margin model applied to the marketing planning of a container liner carrier. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering Maritime Environment2009; 223: 63–90.
14.
ToddD.The world shipbuilding industry. London: Routledge, 2019.
15.
KimH-C. Ships of Korea. Seoul, Korea: Jisung Press, 2006.
16.
PorterME. Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1986.
17.
EllingsenOAaslandKE. Digitalizing the maritime industry: a case study of technology acquisition and enabling advanced manufacturing technology. J Eng Technol Manag2019; 54: 12–27.
18.
SiSChenH. A literature review of disruptive innovation: what it is, how it works and where it goes. J Eng Technol Manag2020; 56: 101568.
19.
MorganNAFengHWhitlerKA. Marketing capabilities in international marketing. J Int Mark2018; 26: 61–95.
20.
KalekaAMorganNA. Which competitive advantage(s)? competitive advantage–market performance relationships in international markets. J Int Mark2017; 25: 25–49.
21.
KhoujaMSubramaniamCVasudevV. A comparative analysis of marketing promotions and implications for data analytics. Int J Res Mark2020; 37(1): 151–174.
22.
KotlerPArmstrongG. Principles of marketing. 16th global ed. New Jersey, USA: Harlow: Pearson, 2013.
23.
OladepoOIAbimbolaOS. The influence of brand image and promotional mix on consumer buying decision-a study of beverage consumers in Lagos State, Nigeria. Br J Mark Stud2015; 3: 97–109.
24.
SeminiMHaartveitDEGAlfnesE, et al. Strategies for customized shipbuilding with different customer order decoupling points. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2014; 228: 362–372.
25.
TodorovaG. Marketing communication mix. Trakia J Sci2015; 13: 368–374.
26.
LynchJ. Advertising industry evolution: agency creativity, fluid teams and diversity. An exploratory investigation. J Mark Manag2019; 35: 845–866.
27.
SwaniKBrownBPMudambiSM. The untapped potential of B2B advertising: a literature review and future agenda. Ind Mark Manag2020; 89: 581–593.
28.
YangSLinSCarlsonJR, et al. Brand engagement on social media: will firms’ social media efforts influence search engine advertising effectiveness?J Mark Manag2016; 32: 526–557.
29.
DeGarisLKwakDHMcDanielSR. Modeling the effects of sponsorship-linked marketing: when does memory matter?J Promot Manag2017; 23: 320–339.
30.
RyanA. Practice (mis)matching: multiple performations of a cultural sponsorship network. J Market Manag2018; 34: 1445–1469.
BruceGGarrardI. The business of shipbuilding. New York, NY: CRC Press, 2013.
36.
BirklerJSchankJFArenaMV, et al. Australia’s naval shipbuilding enterprise. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2015.
37.
BaekSLeeSLeeD. Analysis on product architecture and organizational capability of shipbuilding industry in South Korea and China. J Technol Innovation2018; 26: 69–93.
38.
LeeHSGriffithDA. The balancing of country-based interaction orientation and marketing strategy implementation adaptation/standardization for profit growth in multinational corporations. J Int Mark2019; 27: 22–37.
SamieeSChirapandaS. International marketing strategy in emerging-market exporting firms. J Int Mark2019; 27: 20–37.
41.
EngelenASchmidtSBuchsteinerM. The simultaneous influence of national culture and market turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation: a nine-country study. J Int Manag2015; 21: 18–30.
42.
AdlandRNorlandKSætrevikE. The impact of shipyard and shipowner heterogeneity on contracting prices in the newbuilding market. Marit Bus Rev2017; 2: 58–78.
43.
HossainKAZakariaNMG. A study on global shipbuilding growth, trend and future forecast. Procedia Eng2017; 194: 247–253.
44.
CurtisS. The law of shipbuilding contracts. Abingdon: CRC Press, 2014.
45.
SinhaSKVermaP. Impact of sales promotion’s benefits on brand equity: an empirical investigation. Global Bus Rev2018; 19: 1663–1680.
46.
DavvetasVHalkiasG. Global and local brand stereotypes: formation, content transfer, and impact. Int Mark Rev2019; 36: 675–701.
47.
GasparottiC. An overview on the shipbuilding market in current period and forecast. Euro Economica2018; 37(3): 254–271.
48.
RenMManningSVavilovS. Does state ownership really matter? The dynamic alignment of China’s resource environment and firm internationalization strategies. J Int Manag2019; 25: 100667.
49.
MohammadzadehMAarabiSMSalamzadehJ. Organizational performance, marketing strategy, and financial strategic alignment: an empirical study on Iranian pharmaceutical firms. DARU J Pharm Sci2013; 21: 65.
50.
OyeniyiO. Sales promotion and consumer loyalty: a study of nigerian tecommunication industry. J Competitiveness2011; 4: 66-77.
51.
MohammadiSEsmaeilyNSalehiN. Prioritization of promotion tools based on AIDA model by analytic hierarchy process in production sector of sport industry. Arch Appl Sci Res2012; 4: 1670–1675.
52.
SteenkampJ-B. The uncertain future of globalization: implications for global consumer culture and global brands. Int Mark Rev2019; 36: 524–535.
