Research on pressure fluctuation phenomenon using the smart isolation tool in subsea pipeline maintenance operation

Abstract

A new isolation technology in subsea pipeline maintenance has been gradually developed in recent years. During the operation, the smart isolation tool is desired to decelerate and stop in the accurate position, which will cause a pressure surge in pipe, it was named “pressure fluctuation phenomenon” in this article. For control precision and sealing reliability, avoiding or reducing the fluctuation phenomenon has been necessary. The characteristics of this phenomenon and the effects of parameters have been investigated using numerical methodologies. The results indicated that this phenomenon mainly affected by deceleration time, flow velocity and aspect ratio, and the optimal parameters are t = 1.5 s, v = 1 m/s and γ = 1.2, respectively. The identical results could be achieved from the sensitivity analysis. It can be concluded that the peak value is more sensitive to deceleration time, less sensitive to flow velocity and least sensitive to aspect ratio. All the studies in this article will provide a reference to improve the control precision and seal reliability using smart isolation tool in subsea pipeline maintenance.

Keywords

Subsea pipeline isolation smart isolation tool differential pressure fluctuation numerical methodology sensitivity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tubb

. Pipeline & gas journal’s 2015 worldwide construction report. Pipeline Gas J 2015; 242: No. 2.

Bowie

. Low pressure hot tap pipeline isolation. Patent 20130192695, USA, 2013.

Garpestad

Tveit

Aleksandersen

Remotely controlled pipeline isolation plugs. In: Offshore Technology Conference Texas, Houston, 4–7 May 1998. Houston: OTC.

Tveit

Aleksandersen

Remote controlled (tether-less) high pressure isolation system. In: SPE Asia pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, 2000. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Brisbane, Australia, 16–18 October 2000. Texas: SPE.

Aleksandersen

Tveit

. The smart plug: a remotely controlled pipeline isolation system. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international offshore and polar engineering conference, 2001. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers. Stavanger, Norway, 17–22 June 2001. California: ISOPE.

Younes

Abdelrahman

Helal

. Dynamic behavior of transient flow in pipeline system, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2001; 4359: 1432–1442.

Prashanth Reddy

Narasimhan

Bhallamudi

. Simulation and state estimation of transient flow in gas pipeline networks using a transfer function model. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006; 45: 3853–3863.

Wang

Yuan

et al . Numerical simulation of transient flow in products pipeline. Adv Mat Res 2013; 733: 487–490.

Afshar

Rohani

Taheri

Simulation of transient flow in pipeline systems due to load rejection and load acceptance by hydroelectric power plants. Int J Mech Sci 2010; 52: 103–115.

10.

Koeijer

Borch

Jakobsenb

et al . Experiments and modeling of two-phase transient flow during CO₂ pipeline depressurization. Energ Proc 2009; 1: 1683–1689.

11.

Afshar

Rohani

Water hammer simulation by implicit method of characteristic. Int J Pres Ves Pip 2008; 85: 851–859.

12.

Bergant

Tijsseling

A S

Vítkovský

J P

et al . Parameters affecting water-hammer wave attenuation, shape and timing—Part 1: Mathematical tools. J Hydraul Res 2008; 46: 373–381.

13.

Bergant

Tijsseling

Vítkovský

et al . Parameters affecting water-hammer wave attenuation, shape and timing—part 2: case studies. J Hydraul Res 2008; 46: 382–391.

14.

Yao

Kember

Hansen

Analysis of water hammer attenuation in applications with varying valve closure times. J Eng Mech 2015; 141: 04014107.

15.

Kodura

An analysis of the impact of valve closure time on the course of water hammer. Arch Hydro-Eng Env Mech 2016; 63: 35–45.

16.

Tian

Wang

et al . Numerical simulation and optimization on valve-induced water hammer characteristics for parallel pump feedwater system. Ann Nucl Energy 2008; 35: 2280–2287.

17.

González

Vega

Oro

JMF

et al . Numerical modeling of the piston effect in longitudinal ventilation systems for subway tunnels. Tunn Underground Space Technol Incorpor Trenchless Technol Res 2014; 40: 22–37.

18.

Lin

Chuah

Liu

CW.

A study on underground tunnel ventilation for piston effects influenced by draught relief shaft in subway system. Appl Therm Eng 2008; 28: 372–379.

19.

Pan

Fan

Liu

et al . A review of the piston effect in subway stations. Adv Mech Eng 2013; 2013: 950205.

20.

Ghidaoui

Zhao

Mcinnis

et al . A review of water hammer theory and practice. Appl Mech Rev 2005; 58: 49–76.

21.

Zhu

Zhang

Wang

et al . The impact of pipeline bend on bi-directional pig and the theories for the optimal pig design. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Takamatsu, Japan, 4–7 August 2013, pp.87–92. New York: IEEE.

22.

Asserin

Loredo

Petelet

et al . Global sensitivity analysis in welding simulations—what are the material data you really need?Finite Elem Anal Des 2011; 47: 1004–1016.

23.

Myers

Montgomery

. Response surface methodology: process and product in optimization using designed experiments. J Stat Plan Infer, 1997; 38: 284–286.

24.

Marimuthu

Murugan

Sensitivity analysis of process parameters in PTA hardfacing of valve seats using response surface methodology. Mat Sci Technol 2013; 21: 941–947.

25.

Palani

Murugan

Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in cladding of stainless steel by flux cored arc welding. J Manuf Process 2006; 8: 90–100.

26.

Tian

Liu

Deng

et al . Sensitivity analysis for process parameters influencing electric arc cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technology 2015; 78: 481–492.