Spring clips type Vossloh SKL14 (fastening system of track) are vulnerable to fatigue damage in lifetime due to excitations caused by traffic loads. This article has tried to develop a method for reliability analysis of spring clips type SKL14, based on fracture mechanics approach. First of all, a linear dynamic analysis of track has been done for dynamic response calculations under various traffic loads. The displacement time histories are applied on finite element method of type Vossloh SKL14 to achieve cyclic stresses. The equivalent stress range is described by lognormal distribution. Then, fracture reliability analysis has been done for crack propagation assessment in spring clip based on Paris’s law. This fatigue crack growth is dominated by a Mode I mechanism. A linear limit state function based on fracture mechanics is derived in terms of random variables. First-order reliability method has been employed for reliability estimation. At the end, the influence of various random variables on overall probability of failure has been studied through sensitivity analysis.
AnastasopoulosIGazetasG. Analysis of failure of guardrail base-plates in scissors crossovers of the Athens Metro: the role of foundation-structure interaction. Eng Fail Anal2007; 14: 765–782.
3.
EsveldC. Modern railway track. 2nd ed.Zaltbommel: MRT Productions, 2001.
LakusicSBartosD. Experimental and numerical analysis of the rail fastening spring clips types SKL11-SK12. In: 22nd Danubia-Adria symposium on experimental methods in solid mechanics, Parma, 28 September–1 October 2005, pp.248–249. Available at : http://www.ysesm.ing.unibo.it/
6.
DensimoneHBerettaS. Mechanisms of mixed mode fatigue crack propagation at rail butt-welds. Int J Fatigue2006; 28: 635–642.
7.
FletcherDISmithLKapoorA. Rail rolling contact fatigue dependence on friction, predicted using fracture mechanics with a three dimensional boundary element model. Eng Fract Mech2009; 76: 2612–2625.
8.
SkyttebolAJosefsonBLRingsbergJW. Fatigue crack growth in welded rail under the influence of residual stresses. Eng Fract Mech2005; 72: 271–285.
9.
BerettaSBoniardiMCarboniM. Mode II fatigue failures at rail butt-welds. Eng Fail Anal2005; 12: 157–165.
10.
VanKDMaitournamMHMoumnZ. A comprehensive approach for modeling fatigue and fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech2009; 76: 2626–2636.
11.
BogdańskiSTrajerM. A dimensionless multi-size finite element model of rolling contact fatigue crack. Wear2005; 258: 1265–1272.
12.
SihGCTzouDY. Three dimensional transverse fatigue crack growth in railhead. Theor Appl Fract Mec1984; 1: 103–115.
13.
WallentinMBjarnehedHLLundénR. Cracks around railway wheel flats exposed to rolling contact loads and residual stresses. Wear2005; 258: 1319–1329.
14.
CanadincDSehitogluHVerzalK. Analysis of surface crack growth under rolling contact fatigue. Int J Fatigue2008; 30: 1678–1689.
15.
MohammadzadehSSharaviMKeshavarzianH. Reliability analysis of fatigue crack initiation of railhead in bolted rail joint. Eng Fail Anal2012; 29: 132–148.
16.
LiuYLiuLStratmanB. Multiaxial fatigue reliability analysis of railroad wheels. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2008; 93: 456–467.
17.
VaidyaPRausandM. Remaining useful life, technical health, and life extension. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2012; 225(2): 219–231.
18.
ChateauneufACocheteuxFDeffargesF. Reliability analysis of screwed connections in high-speed trains, considering fatigue, corrosion, and imperfect maintenance operations. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2011; 225(3): 293–306.
19.
BS EN 13146-4:2012. Railway applications. Track. Test methods for fastening systems. Effect of repeated loading (Standard, CEN).
20.
RichardHH. Fastener assemblies for railway rails. European Patent application EP0811720A3, 1997.
21.
HauschildGVorderbruckDBudaR. System for fastening a rail for a rail vehicle. Patent US 7,854,392 B2, USA, 2010.
22.
GutierrezMJEdwardsJRBarkanCHPL. Advancements in fastening system design for North Americans concrete crossties in heavy-haul service. In: AREMA 2010 annual conference and exposition, Orlando, FL, 29 August–1 September 2010.
23.
MohammadzadehSAhadiSNouriM. Stress-based fatigue reliability analysis of the rail fastening spring clip under traffic loads. Lat Am J Solids Stru2014; 11(6): 993–1011.
24.
MohammadzadehSGhahremaniS. Estimation of train derailment probability using rail profile alterations. Struct Infrastruct E2012; 8(11): 1034–1053.
25.
LarssonT. Material and fatigue properties of old metal bridges. PhD Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 2006.
Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS). The probabilistic model code, http://www.jcss.ethz.ch (2001).
28.
BannantineJAComerJHandrockJL. Fundamentals of metal fatigue analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
29.
NewmanJCRajuIS. Stress-intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads. New York: Langley Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1984.
30.
NowakASCollinsKR. Reliability of structures. Second edition, Taylor & Francis, USA, 2013.
31.
StraubD. Generic approaches to risk based inspection planning for steel structures. Zurich: Institute of Structural Engineering, ETH Zurich, 2004.
32.
SiddiquiNAAhmadS. Fatigue and fracture reliability of TLP tethers under random loading. Mar Struct2001; 14: 331–352.
33.
SunYQDhanasekarM. A dynamic model for the vertical interaction of the rail track and wagon system. Int J Solids Struct2002; 39: 1337–1359.
34.
NewtonSGClarkRA. An investigation into the dynamic effects on the track of wheelflats on railway vehicles. J Mech Eng Sci1979; 21(4): 287–297.
35.
DukkipatiRVDongRG. Impact loads due to wheel flats and shells. Vehicle Syst Dyn1999; 31(1): 1–22.
36.
DahlbergT. Vertical dynamic train/track interaction—verifying a theoretical model by full-scale experiments. Vehicle Syst Dyn1995; 24: 45–57.
37.
ZakeriJAXiaHFanJJ. Dynamic responses of train-track system to single rail irregularity. Lat Am J Solids Stru2009; 6: 89–104.
38.
EsmaeiliMNoghabiH. Investigating seismic behavior of ballasted railway track in earthquake excitation using FEM in three dimensional space. J Transport Eng2013; 139: 697–708.
39.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures. USA: Prentice Hall, 1996.
40.
ZienkiewiczOCTaylorRL. The finite element method. Sixth edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, Canada, 2005.
