This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation of a taut-moored wave energy converter system with a point-absorber type of wave energy converter. The wave energy converter system consists of a buoy, a unique three-leg two-segment mooring system with submerged floaters, and a power take-off system designed for the current experiment as a heave plate. The main objective of the study is to validate a numerical simulation model against experiments carried out in an ocean basin laboratory. Two physical models in model scales 1:20 and 1:36 were built and tested. The detailed experimental testing programme encompasses tests of mooring system stiffness, decay tests, and different sea state conditions for ocean current, regular, and irregular waves. A numerical model in the model scale 1:20 was developed to simulate coupled hydrodynamic and structural response analyses of the wave energy converter system, primarily using potential flow theory, boundary element method, finite element method, and the Morison equation. Several numerical simulations are presented for each part of the experimental testing programme. Results for the wave energy converter buoy motions under operational conditions from the experiments and the numerical simulations were compared. This study shows that the simulation model can satisfactorily predict the dynamic motion responses of the wave energy converter system at non-resonant conditions, while at resonant conditions additional calibration is needed to capture the damping present during the experiment. A discussion on simulation model calibration with regard to linear and non-linear damping highlights the challenge to estimate these damping values if measurement data are not available.
International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC). ITTC recommended guidelines: wave energy converter model test experiments. In: 27th international towing tank conference, Copenhagen, 31 August–5 September 2014. https://ittc.info/media/4168/75-02-07-037.pdf
SarmentoAThomasG. Guidelines for laboratory testing of WECs. In: CruzJ (ed.) Ocean wave energy: current status and future perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp.160–169.
8.
BraccoGCagnineiAGiorcelliE. Experimental validation of the ISWEC wave to PTO model. Ocean Eng2016; 120: 40–51.
9.
RhinefrankKSchacherAPrudellJ. Numerical analysis and scaled high resolution tank testing of a novel wave energy converter. J Offshore Mech Arct2013; 135: 041901.
10.
StansbyPMorenoECStallardT. Capture width of the three-float multi-mode multi-resonance broadband wave energy line absorber M4 from laboratory studies with irregular waves of different spectral shape and directional spread. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy2015; 1: 287–298.
11.
TodalshaugJHÁsgeirssonGSHjálmarssonE. Tank testing of an inherently phase-controlled wave energy converter. Int J Mar Energy2016; 15: 68–84.
12.
BeattySJHallMBuckhamBJ. Experimental and numerical comparisons of self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters in regular waves. Ocean Eng2015; 104: 370–386.
13.
SunLZangJStansbyP. Linear diffraction analysis of the three-float multi-mode wave energy converter M4 for power capture and structural analysis in irregular waves with experimental validation. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy2017; 3: 51–68.
14.
MahnamfarFAltunkaynakA. Comparison of numerical and experimental analyses for optimizing the geometry of OWC systems. Ocean Eng2017; 130: 10–24.
15.
ShengWFlanneryBLewisA. Experimental studies of a floating cylindrical OWC WEC. In: ASME 2012 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and artic engineering (OMAE2012), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–6 July 2012, pp.169–178. New York: ASME.
16.
ZanuttighBAngelelliEKofoedJP. Effects of mooring systems on the performance of a wave activated body energy converter. Renew Energ2013; 57: 422–431.
17.
GaoZMoanTWanL. Comparative numerical and experimental study of two combined wind and wave energy concepts. J Ocean Eng Sci2016; 1: 36–51.
18.
ParedesGMPalmJEskilssonC. Experimental investigation of mooring configurations for wave energy converters. Int J Mar Energy2016; 15: 56–67.
19.
HarnoisVWellerSDJohanningL. Numerical model validation for mooring systems: method and application for wave energy converters. Renew Energ2015; 75: 869–887.
20.
YangS-HRingsbergJWJohnsonE. A comparison of coupled and de-coupled simulation procedures for the fatigue analysis of wave energy converter mooring lines. Ocean Eng2016; 117: 332–345.
21.
CasaubieilhPThiebautFShengW. Performance improvements of mooring systems for wave energy converters. In: Guedes SoaresC (ed.) Renewable Energies Offshore (RENEW2014), Lisbon, 24–26 November 2014, pp.897–903. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
22.
FitzgeraldJBergdahlL. Considering mooring cables for offshore wave energy conversion. In: 7th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC2007), Porto, 11–13 September 2007.
23.
BosmaBThiebautFShengW. Comparison of a catenary and compliant taut mooring system for marine energy systems. In: 11th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC2015), Nantes, 6–11 September 2015.
24.
BarltropNVaryaniKSGrantA. Wave-current interactions in marine current turbines. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering Maritime Environment2006; 220: 195–203.
25.
MazarakosTPMavrakosSA. Wave–current interaction on a vertical truncated cylinder floating in finite-depth waters. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering Maritime Environment2013; 227: 243–255.
26.
SaruwatariAIngramDMCraddenL. Wave–current interaction effects on marine energy converters. Ocean Eng2013; 73: 106–118.
27.
PayneGSTaylorJRMBruceT. Assessment of boundary-element method for modelling a free-floating sloped wave energy device. Part 2: experimental validation. Ocean Eng2008; 35: 342–357.
28.
ParmeggianiSKofoedJPFriis-MadsenE. Experimental update of the overtopping model used for the Wave Dragon wave energy converter. Energies2013; 6: 1961–1992.
29.
ShengWAlcornRLewisA. Assessment of primary energy conversions of oscillating water columns. II. Power take-off and validations. J Renew Sustain Ener2014; 6: 053114.
30.
SunLStansbyPZangJ. Linear diffraction analysis for optimisation of the three-float multi-mode wave energy converter M4 in regular waves including small arrays. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy2016; 2: 429–438.
31.
MichailidesCGaoZMoanT. Experimental and numerical study of the response of the offshore combined wind/wave energy concept SFC in extreme environmental conditions. Mar Struct2016; 50: 35–54.
32.
MichailidesCGaoZMoanT. Experimental study of the functionality of a semisubmersible wind turbine combined with flap-type wave energy converters. Renew Energ2016; 93: 675–690.
33.
WanLGaoZMoanT. Experimental and numerical comparisons of hydrodynamic responses for a combined wind and wave energy converter concept under operational conditions. Renew Energ2016; 93: 87–100.
34.
Mercadé RuizPFerriFKofoedJP. Experimental validation of a wave energy converter array hydrodynamics tool. Sustainability2017; 9: 115.
35.
LiYYuY-H. A synthesis of numerical methods for modeling wave energy converter-point absorbers. Renew Sust Energ Rev2012; 16: 4352–4364.
36.
CombourieuALawsonMBabaritA. WEC3: wave energy converter code comparison project. In: 11th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC2015), Nantes, 6–11 September 2015.
37.
DavidsonJRingwoodJV. Mathematical modelling of mooring systems for wave energy converters – a review. Energies2017; 10: 666.
38.
ThomsenJBEskilssonCFerriF. Assessment of available numerical tools for dynamic mooring analysis: wP1.2 & M1. Technical Report no. 220, 2017. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
39.
JohanningLSmithGHWolframJ. Measurements of static and dynamic mooring line damping and their importance for floating WEC devices. Ocean Eng2007; 34: 1918–1934.
40.
VickersAW. Improve the understanding of uncertainties in numerical analysis of moored floating wave energy converters. PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, 2012.
41.
PalmJEskilssonCParedesGM. Coupled mooring analysis for floating wave energy converters using CFD: formulation and validation. Int J Mar Energy2016; 16: 83–99.
42.
BhinderMAKarimiradMWellerS. Modelling mooring line non-linearities (material and geometric effects) for a wave energy converter using AQWA, SIMA and Orcaflex. In: 11th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC2015), Nantes, 6–11 September 2015.
43.
YangS-HRingsbergJWJohnsonE. Parametric study of the dynamic motions and mechanical characteristics of power cables for wave energy converters. J Mar Sci Technol. Epub ahead of print 28April2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00773–017–0451–0.
44.
YangS-HRingsbergJWJohnsonE. Biofouling on mooring lines and power cables used in wave energy converter systems – analysis of fatigue life and energy performance. Appl Ocean Res2017; 65: 166–177.
ForestierJ-MHolmesBBarrettS. Value and validation of small scale physical model tests of floating wave energy converters. In: 7th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC2007), Porto, 11–13 September 2007.
48.
ShengWAlcornRLewisT. Physical modelling of wave energy converters. Ocean Eng2014; 84: 29–36.
FalnesJ. Wave-energy absorption by oscillating bodies. In: Ocean waves and oscillating systems: linear interactions including wave-energy extraction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002; pp.196–224.
51.
DeanRGDalrympleRA. Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 1991.
52.
ChakrabartiSK. Hydrodynamics of offshore structures. Southampton: WIT Press, 1987.
WheelerJD. Method for calculating forces produced by irregular waves. In: Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, 18–21 May 1969, vol.I, pp.71–82.
56.
AstrupOC. DeepC – deep water coupled analysis tool. A white paper. Rev 3, May2004. Høvik: Det Norske Veritas.
57.
PazMLeighW. Damped single-degree-of-freedom system. In: Structural dynamics: theory and computation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004; pp.31–48.
58.
FitzgeraldJBergdahlL. Including moorings in the assessment of a generic offshore wave energy converter: a frequency domain approach. Mar Struct2008; 21: 23–46.
59.
YangS-HRingsbergJWJohnsonE. Analysis of mooring lines for wave energy converters — a comparison of de-coupled and coupled simulation procedures. In: ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and artic engineering (OMAE2014), San Francisco, CA, 8–13 June 2014, pp.V04AT02A034. New York: ASME.
60.
MobergG. Wave forces on a vertical slender cylinder. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 1988.
