For several decades, public political discourses on ‘welfare dependency’ have failed to recognise that welfare states are not the source of economic dependence, but rather reconfigure economic dependencies in a specific way. This article distinguishes four senses of ‘economic dependence’ that can help to clarify what is missing from these discourses, and what is at stake in political and legal decisions about how we may economically depend upon one another. While feminist, republican and egalitarian philosophical work has examined the problems of dependence on states, in families and in markets, the present approach adds a further dimension to our cultural and political concerns with economic dependence: it argues that it is reasonable and useful to consider the economic dependence of the economically powerful. Doing so requires a clarification of the ‘varieties of dependence’ that exist in contemporary societies and economies, and the recognition that legal and political choices regarding social and economic justice are often about choosing between varieties of dependence, not about escaping dependence entirely.
BeckertJ (2007)
The longue durée of inheritance law: Discourses and institutional development in France, Germany, and the United States since 1800. European Journal of Sociology48: 79–120.
2.
BerlinI (1969) Two concepts of liberty. In: Berlin I Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–172.
Centre for Social Justice (2013) Signed On, Written Off.
London:
Centre for Social Justice.
12.
ClaassenRHerzogL (2019)
Why economic agency matters: An account of structural domination in the economic realm. European Journal of Political Theory. Epub ahead of print 9 March 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1474885119832181.
Cockburn P J L (2018a) The Politics of Dependence: Economic Parasites and Vulnerable Lives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
Cockburn P J L (2018b) Proprietors and parasites: Dependence and the power to accumulate. Philosophy and Social Criticism 44(2): 179–199.
17.
CohenM (1978) Property and sovereignty. In: Macpherson CB (ed.) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 153–171.
18.
CooperM (2017) Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and New Social Conservatism.
New York:
Zone Books.
19.
DanzigerSGottschalkP (1985)
The poverty of losing ground. Challenge28(2): 32–38.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
22.
FinemanM (2004) The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency.
New York:
The New Press.
23.
FinemanM (2008)
The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism20(1): 1–23.
24.
FolbreN (1991)
The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in nineteenth-century economic thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society16(3): 463–484.
25.
FraserNGordonL (1994)
A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S.welfare state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society19(2): 309–336.
26.
GallieWB (1955)
Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56: 167–198.
27.
GoodinRE (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsbilities.
Chicago, IL and London:
Chicago University Press.
28.
GoodinRE (1988) Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
29.
GourevitchA (2013)
Labor republicanism and the transformation of work. Political Theory41(4): 591–617.
30.
GourevitchA (2016)
The limits of a basic income: Means and ends of workplace democracy. Basic Income Studies11(1): 17–28.
31.
HaleRL (1943)
Bargaining duress and economic liberty. Columbia Law Review43(5): 603–628.
32.
HochschildA (2013) So How’s the Family? And Other Essays.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
33.
HøjrupT (2003) State, Culture and Life-Modes: The Foundations of Life-Mode Analysis.
Aldershot:
Ashgate.
34.
HudsonM (2015) Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy.
Dresden:
ISLET Verlag.
35.
KittayEF (1998)
Welfare, dependency, and a public ethic of care. Social Justice25(1): 123–145.
36.
KittayEF (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency.
New York:
Routledge.
37.
KittayEFFederEF (2002) Introduction. In: Kittay EF and Feder EF (eds) The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 4–10.
38.
KohnM (2019)
Radical republican solidarity. European Journal of Political Theory. Epub ahead of print 14 October 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1474885119881313
39.
LukesS (2002) Power: A radical view. In: Lukes S Power: A Radical View. 2nd edn. London: Red Globe Press, pp. 14–59.
40.
MackenzieCRogersWDoddsS (eds) (2014) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
41.
MarxK (1990) Capital. Vol 1. Trans. B Fowkes. London: Penguin.
42.
MarxK (1993 [1857]) Grundrisse. Trans. M Nicolaus. London: Penguin.
43.
MeadL (1998)
Telling the poor what to do. The Public Interest132: 97–112.
44.
Meiksins WoodE (2002)
The question of market dependence. Journal of Agrarian Change2(1): 50–87.
45.
MoynihanDP (1965) The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.
Washington, DC:
Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.
46.
MuldoonJ (2019) A socialist republican theory of freedom and government. Political Theory. EPub ahead of print 20 May 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1474885119847606
47.
MusolffA (2014)
From social to biological parasites and back: The conceptual career of a metaphor. Contributions to the History of Concepts9(2): 18–32.
48.
O’ConnorB (2001)
The intellectual origins of ‘welfare dependency’. Australian Journal of Social Issues36(3): 221–236.
49.
PatemanC (1989) The Disorder of Women.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
50.
PatemanC (2004)
Democratizng citizenship: Some advantages of a universal basic income. Politics & Society32(1): 89–105.
51.
PatemanC (2011) Carole Pateman: Democracy, Feminism, Welfare. Edited by T Carver and S Chambers. London and New York: Routledge.
52.
PettitP (2007)
A republican right to basic income?Basic Income Studies2(2): 1–8.
53.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the 21st Century. Trans. A Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
54.
PurdyJ (2007)
People as resources: Recruitment and reciprocity in the freedom-promoting approach to property. Duke Law Journal56: 1047–1117.
55.
SayerA (2015) Why We Can’t Afford the Rich.
Bristol:
Policy Press.
56.
SayerA (2016) Moral economy, unearned income, and legalized corruption. In: Whyte D and Wiegratz J (eds) Neoliberalism and the Moral Economy of Fraud. London: Routledge, pp.44–56.
57.
SimmelG (1978 [1900]) The Philosophy of Money. Trans. T Bottomore and D Frisby. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
58.
SmileyM (2001)
Welfare dependence: The power of a concept. Thesis Eleven64: 21–38.
59.
SmithA (1986 [1776]) The Wealth of Nations.
Toronto:
Penguin.
60.
SwiftAWhiteS (2008) Political theory, social science, and real politics. In: Leopold D and Stears M (eds) Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.49–69.
61.
ThompsonMJ (2019)
The radical republican structure of Marx’s critique of capitalist society. Critique47(3): 391–409.
62.
TrumpDJ (2011) Time to Get Tough: Making America Great Again.
Washington, DC:
Regnery Publishing.
63.
ZelizerV (1989)
The social meaning of money: “Special monies”. The American Journal of Sociology95(2): 342–377.
64.
ZelizerV (2000)
The purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry25(3): 817–848.
