Political realism criticises the putative abstraction, foundationalism and neglect of the agonistic dimension of political practice in the work of John Rawls. This paper argues that had Rawls not fully specified the implementation of his theory of justice in one particular form of political economy then he would be vulnerable to a realist critique. But he did present such an implementation: a property-owning democracy. An appreciation of Rawls s specificationist method undercuts the realist critique of his conception of justice as fairness.
AdornoTWGehlenA (1983) Ist die Soziologie eine Wissenschaft vom Menschen? In: Grenz (ed.) Adorno's Philosophie in Grundbegriffen: Auflösung einer Deutungsprobleme, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 225–251.
2.
Bavister-GouldA (2011) Bernard Williams: Political realism and the limits of legitimacy. European Journal of Philosophy21: 1–18.
3.
CohenGA (2008) Rescuing Justice and Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
DennettDC (1991) Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy88: 27–51.
5.
DePaulM (1986) Reflective equilibrium and foundationalism. American Philosophical Quarterly23: 59–69.
6.
DworkinR (2002) Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
EbertzR (1993) Is reflective equilibrium a coherentist model?Canadian Journal of Philosophy23: 193–214.
8.
EstlundD (1996) The survival of egalitarian justice in John Rawls's Political Liberalism. The Journal of Political Philosophy4: 68–78.
9.
ForresterK (2012) Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and political realism. European Journal of Political Theory11: 247–272.
10.
FreyenhagenF (2011) Taking reasonable pluralism seriously: an internal critique of political liberalism. Philosophy, Politics and Economics10: 323–342.
11.
FreyenhagenF (2013) Adorno's Practical Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly, Cambridge University Press.
12.
FrickerM (2000) Confidence and irony. In: HarcourtE (ed.) Morality, Reflection and Ideology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–112.
13.
GeussR (2005) Outside Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
GeussR (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
GeussR (2010) Politics and the Imagination, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
GeussR (2014a) Did Williams do ethics?A World Without Why, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 175–194.
GledhillJ (2012) Rawls and realism. Social Theory and Practice3: 55–82.
19.
Hall E (2015) Bernard Williams and the basic legitimation demand: A defence. Early View. Political Studies, 63(2): 466–480.
20.
HardimonM (1994) Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Jubb R (2015) Playing Kant at the Court of King Arthur. Early View. Political Studies, 63(4): 919–934.
22.
KitcherP (2001) Science, Truth and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
LarmoreC (2012) What is political philosophy?Journal of Moral Philosophy10: 276–306.
24.
McGinnM (1989) Sense and Certainty, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
MooreA (2006) Maxims and thick ethical concepts. Ratio19: 129–147.
26.
Nagel T (2000) Personal rights and public space. In: Koh H and Slye RC (eds) Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press pp.33–48.
27.
NinoCS (1991) Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
29.
O’Neill O (1989) Constructivisms in ethics. In: Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–218.
30.
RawlsJ (1971/1999) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Rawls J (1983) Papers of John Rawls, Series: IV. Letter box files, 1958–1994 and undated, Lecture notes on Bernard Williams, ‘Conflict of Values’ (1983) in L. Letter box file 12. Contemporary Moral Philosophy, 1983, 1985. HUM 48 Box 38:14 Harvard University Archives.
32.
RawlsJ (1993/1996) Political Liberalism, Cambridge, MA: Columbia University Press.
33.
RawlsJ (1995/1996) Reply to Habermas. Journal of Philosophy92: 132–180. Reprinted in the paperback edition of Rawls (1993/1996).
34.
RawlsJ (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
RawlsJ (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
RichardsonHS (1994) Practical Reasoning about Final Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
RipsteinA (2010) Critical notice: G. A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy40: 669–700.
38.
RossiE (2010) Reality and imagination in political theory and practice: On Raymond Geuss's Realism. European Journal of Political Theory9: 504–512.
39.
RossiE (2012) Justice, legitimacy, and (normative) authority for political realists. Critical Review of Social and International Political Philosophy15: 149–164.
40.
RossiE (2013) Consensus, compromise, justice and legitimacy. Critical Review of Social and International Political Philosophy16: 557–572.
41.
SangiovanniA (2008) Justice and the priority of politics to morality. The Journal of Political Philosophy16: 137–164.
42.
ScanlonT (1998) What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
ScanlonT (2000) Intention and permissibility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society74: 301–317.
44.
SchefflerS (1987) Morality through thick and thin. The Philosophical Review96: 411–434.
45.
ShklarJ (1992) The Faces of Injustice, New Haven: Yale University Press.
46.
SimmonsAJ (1999) Justification and legitimacy. Ethics109: 739–771.
47.
SleatM (2010) Bernard Williams and the possibility of a realist political theory. European Journal of Political Theory9: 485–503.
48.
SleatM (2011) Liberal realism: A liberal response to the realist critique. The Review of Politics73: 469–496.
49.
SleatM. (2015) Justice and legitimacy in contemporary liberal thought: A critique. Social Theory and Practice. 41: 230–52.
50.
ThomasA (2006) Value and Context: The Nature of Moral and Political Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
ThomasA (2011) Cohen's critique of Rawls: A ‘Double-Counting’ objection. Mind120: 1099–1141.
52.
van ParijsP (2002) Difference principles. In: FreemanS (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–240.
53.
WestphalKR (2005) Kant, Hegel and determining our duties. Annual Review of Law and Ethics13: 335–354.
54.
Williams B (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.
55.
WilliamsB (1993) A fair state: Review of John Rawls. Political Liberalism', London Review of Books. May 13.
56.
WilliamsB (1997) Forward to basics. In: FranklinJ (ed.) Equality, Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 49–58.
57.
Williams B (2002) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
WilliamsB (2005) In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
WittgensteinL (1975) On Certainty, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
