Methods to identify multiple trajectories of change over time are of great interest in nursing and in related health research. Latent growth mixture modeling is a data-centered analytic strategy that allows us to study questions about distinct trajectories of change in key measures or outcomes of interest. In this article, a worked example of latent growth mixture modeling is presented to help expose researchers to the use and appeal of this analytic strategy.
StampKDPrasunMLeeCS, et al. Nursing research in heart failure care: A position statement of the American Association of Heart Failure Nurses (AAHFN). Heart Lung2018; 47: 169–175.
2.
KentDMRothwellPMIoannidisJP, et al. Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: A proposal. Trials2010; 11: 85.
3.
JungTWickramaKA. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Personal Psychol Compass2008; 2: 302–317.
LeeCSMuddJOHiattSO, et al. Trajectories of heart failure self-care management and changes in quality of life. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2015; 14: 486–494.
6.
CreberRMLeeCSLennieTA, et al. Using growth mixture modeling to identify classes of sodium adherence in adults with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs2014; 29: 209–217.
7.
PancaniLAusiliDGrecoA, et al. Trajectories of self-care confidence and maintenance in adults with heart failure: A latent class growth analysis. Int J Behav Med2018; 25: 399–409.
8.
PucciarelliGLeeCSLyonsKS, et al. Quality of life trajectories among stroke survivors and the related changes in caregiver outcomes: A growth mixture study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 433–440.e431.
9.
LeeCSMuddJOGelowJM, et al. Background and design of the profiling biobehavioral responses to mechanical support in advanced heart failure study. J Cardiovasc Nurs2014; 29: 405–415.
10.
HansenLLyonsKSDieckmannNF, et al. Background and design of the symptom burden in end-stage liver disease patient-caregiver dyad study. Res Nurs Health2017; 40: 398–413.
11.
RiegelBLeeCSRatcliffeSJ, et al. Predictors of objectively measured medication nonadherence in adults with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail2012; 5: 430–436.
12.
LanzaSTDziakJJHuangL, et al. PROC LCA & PROC LTA users’ guide (Version 1.3.2). University Park, PA: The Methodology Center, Penn State, 2015.
13.
StataCorp. Stata structural equation modeling reference manual release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2019.
RamNGrimmKJ. Methods and measures: Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. Int J Behav Dev2009; 33: 565–576.
16.
JurgensCYLeeCSRiegelB. Psychometric analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a measure of patient symptom perception. J Cardiovasc Nurs2017; 32: 140–147.
GradyKLMeyerPMDresslerD, et al. Longitudinal change in quality of life and impact on survival after left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg2004; 77: 1321–1327.
19.
LeeCSGelowJMChienCV, et al. Implant strategy-specific changes in symptoms in response to left ventricular assist devices. J Cardiovasc Nurs2018; 33: 144–151.
20.
NylundKLAsparouhovTMuthenB. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling2007; 14: 535–569.
21.
LoYMendellNRRubinDB. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika2001; 88: 767–778.
22.
ChenQLuoWPalardyJP, et al. The efficacy of common fit indices for enumerating classes in growth mixture models when nested data structure is ignored: A Monte Carlo study. SAGE Open2017; 7. DOI: 10.1177/2158244017700459.
23.
LubkeGNealeMC. Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood?Multivariate Behav Res2006; 41: 499–532.
24.
RiegelBLeeCSGlaserD, et al. Patterns of change in cognitive function over six months in adults with chronic heart failure. Cardiol Res Pract2012; 2012: 631075.
25.
TsaiMFTsaySLMoserD, et al. Examining symptom trajectories that predict worse outcomes in post-CABG patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2019; 18: 204–214.
26.
MacCallumRCWidamanKFZhangS, et al. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods1999; 4: 84–99.
27.
DziakJJLanzaSTTanX. Effect size, statistical power and sample size requirements for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test in latent class analysis. Struct Equ Modeling2014; 21: 534–552.
