The Home-Heart-Walk study,a self-administered walk test on perceived physical functioning,and self-care behaviour in people with stable chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2018
The Home-Heart-Walk study,a self-administered walk test on perceived physical functioning,and self-care behaviour in people with stable chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial
Adherence to self-care recommendations is associated with improved patient outcomes and improved quality of life for people living with heart failure. The Home-Heart-Walk (HHW) is an intervention to promote physical activity adapting the elements of a six minute walk test, a reliable and valid measure. This adaptation was designed to support self-monitoring of physical functioning and promote the self-care of people with heart failure. The primary outcome of the Home-Heart-Walk was perceived physical functioning and the secondary outcomes were six-minute walk test distance, health related quality of life, self-care behaviour, self-efficacy and physical activity level.
Methods:
A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Participants (N=132) were recruited from three academic hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Participants were randomized to either the Home-Heart-Walk group or the control group. Perceived physical functioning, health related quality of life, self-care behaviour, exercise self-efficacy and physical activity level were measured at baseline and at three- and six-month follow-up.
Results:
After adjusting for baseline scores, there were no statistically significant between-group differences in perceived physical functioning, six-minute walk test distance, health related quality of life and exercise self-efficacy at follow-up. The intervention group had improvement in self-care behaviour (F(1,129) = 4.75, p = 0.031) and physical activity level (U = 1713, z = −2.12, p = 0.034) at the six-month follow-up compared with the control group.
Conclusion:
The Home-Heart-Walk did not improve the perceived physical functioning of the intervention group. Although the feasibility and acceptability of this strategy to support self-monitoring and improve self-care behaviour was demonstrated, self-reported adherence was unreliable; newer technologies may offer better assessment of adherence.
ZiaeianBFonarowGC.Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol2016; 13: 368–378.
2.
FarmakisDStafylasPGiamouzisGet al. The medical and socioeconomic burden of heart failure: A comparative delineation with cancer. Int J Cardiol2016; 203: 279–281.
3.
LainscakMBlueLClarkALet al. Self-care management of heart failure: Practical recommendations from the patient care committee of the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail2011; 13: 115–126.
4.
SetoEMPLeonardKJPMBACafazzoJAPPet al. Self-care and quality of life of heart failure patients at a multidisciplinary heart function clinic. J Cardiovasc Nurs2011; 26: 377–385.
5.
DavidsonPMInglisSCNewtonPJ.Self-care in patients with chronic heart failure. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2013; 13: 351–359.
6.
RiegelBMoserDKAnkerSDet al. State of the science: Promoting self-care in persons with heart failure: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2009; 120: 1141–1163.
7.
RiegelBDicksonVVCameronJet al. Symptom recognition in elders with heart failure. J Nurs Scholarsh2010; 42: 92–100.
8.
SiabaniSLeederSRDavidsonPM.Barriers and facilitators to self-care in chronic heart failure: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Springerplus2013; 2: 320.
9.
DuHNewtonPJSalamonsonYSet al. A review of the 6-minute walk test: Its implications as a self-administered tool. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2008; 8: 2–8.
10.
GaydaMTemfemoAChoquetDet al. Cardiorespiratory requirements and reproducibility of the six-minute walk test in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 1538–1543.
11.
DemersCMcKelvieRSNegassaAet al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J2001; 142: 698–703.
12.
OlssonLGSwedbergKClarkALet al. Six minute corridor walk test as an outcome measure for the assessment of treatment in randomized, blinded intervention trials of chronic heart failure: A systematic review. Eur Heart J2005; 26: 778–793.
13.
CrapoROEnrightPLZeballosRJ.ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2002; 166: 111–117.
14.
HaradaNDChiuVStewartAL.Mobility-related function in older adults: Assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 837–841.
15.
LordSRMenzHB.Physiologic, psychologic, and health predictors of 6-minute walk performance in older people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 907–911.
16.
DuHDavidsonPSalamonsonYet al. Assessment of a self-administered, adapted 6-minute walk test. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev2009; 30: 116–120.
17.
ClarkNMZimmermanBJ.A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning about health. Health Educ Behav2014; 41: 485–491.
18.
DuHYNewtonPJZecchinRet al. An intervention to promote physical activity and self-management in people with stable chronic heart failure The Home-Heart-Walk study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials2011; 12: 63.
19.
GilderS.World Medical Association meets in Helsinki. Br Med J1964; 2: 299–300.
20.
DuHDavidsonPMEverettBet al. Correlation between a self-administered walk test and a standardised Six Minute Walk Test in adults. Nurs Health Sci2011; 13: 114–117.
21.
WareJJSherbourneCD.The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992; 30: 473–483.
22.
RectorTSTschumperlinLKKuboSHet al. Use of the Lving with Heart Failure questionnaire to ascertain patients’ perspectives on improvement in quality of life versus risk of drug-induced death. J Card Fail1995; 1: 201–206.
23.
DunderdaleKThompsonDRMilesJNVet al. Quality-of-life measurement in chronic heart failure: Do we take account of the patient perspective?Eur J Heart Fail2005; 7: 572–582.
24.
SkiCFThompsonDR.Quality of life in cardiovascular disease: What is it and why and how should we measure it?Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2010; 9: 201–202.
25.
SmithBJMarshallALHuangN.Screening for physical activity in family practice: Evaluation of two brief assessment tools. Am J Prev Med2005; 29: 256–264.
26.
JaarsmaTStrombergAMartenssonJet al. Development and testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale. Eur J Heart Fail2003; 5: 363–370.
27.
EverettBSalamonsonYDavidsonPM.Bandura’s exercise self-efficacy scale: Validation in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation setting. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46: 824–829.
28.
JaarsmaTvan der WalMHLLesman-LeegteIet al. Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med2008; 168: 316–323.
29.
JuengerJSchellbergDKraemerSet al. Health related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure: Comparison with other chronic diseases and relation to functional variables. Heart2002; 87: 235–241.
30.
IqbalJFrancesLReidJet al. Quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure and their carers: A 3-year follow-up study assessing hospitalization and mortality. Eur J Heart Fail2010; 12: 1002–1008.
31.
HollandRRechelBStepienKet al. Patients’ self-assessed functional status in heart failure by New York Heart Association Class: A prognostic predictor of hospitalization, quality of life and death. J Card Fail2010; 16: 150–156.
32.
GradyKLde LeonMKozakATet al. Does self-management counseling in patients with heart failure improve quality of life? Findings from the Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART). Qual Life Res2014; 23: 31–38.
33.
De Silva SaccomannICRCintraFAGallaniMCBJ.Health-related quality of life among the elderly with heart failure: A generic measurement. Sao Paulo Med J2010; 128: 192–196.
34.
SmeuldersESTvan HaastregtJCMAmbergenTet al. Nurse-led self-management group programme for patients with congestive heart failure: Randomised controlled trial. J Adv Nurs2010; 66: 1487–1499.
35.
RasekabaTLeeALNaughtonMTet al. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Intern Med J2009; 39: 495–501.
36.
CahalinLPArenaRLabateVet al. Heart rate recovery after the 6 min walk test rather than distance ambulated is a powerful prognostic indicator in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Eur J Heart Fail2013; 15: 519–527.
37.
BarbourKAMillerNH.Adherence to exercise training in heart failure: A review. Heart Fail Rev2008; 13: 81–89.
38.
GuazziMDicksteinKVicenziMet al. Six-minute walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure. A comparative analysis on clinical and prognostic insights. Circ Heart Fail2009; 2: 549–55.
39.
GardnerPJCampagnaPD.Pedometers as measurement tools and motivational devices: New insights for researchers and practitioners. Health Promot Pract2011; 12: 55–62.
40.
SchmidtMDBlizzardCLVennAJet al. Practical considerations when using pedometers to assess physical activity in population studies: Lessons from the Burnie Take Heart Study. Res Q Exerc Sport2007; 78: 162–170.
41.
WangJA.Wearable sensor (Fitbit One) and text-messaging to promote physical activity and participants’ level of engagement (A randomised controlled feasibility trial). Ann Arbor: San Diego State University, 2014.
42.
WarrenJMEkelundUBessonH.Assessment of physical activity-a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol2010; 17: 127–39.
