Background: A coronary angiogram, a diagnostic tool to visualize the coronary anatomy, has traditionally been accessed through the femoral artery. However, in the last 20 years, the radial artery has gained more popularity among physicians and patients, offering an alternative to the femoral approach. Various methods of applying compression to the radial puncture site have been used, but no research has been done to demonstrate the most effective way of achieving hemostasis while limiting complications and ensuring the efficient use of nursing and medical resources.
Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to compare two devices and three methods for achieving hemostasis after a transradial angiogram while assessing vascular complications and time endpoints.
Design and methods: A mechanical device (Terumo™ wristband) and a hydrophilic wound dressing (Clo-Sur P.A.D.) were used. The Terumo band was studied twice, using the current method and a fast-release method.
Results: Taking into account the small sample size of this pilot study (N = 25 per group), statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.005) are seen in time to discharge in the fast-release Terumo (134.0 minutes) and Clo-Sur P.A.D. groups (113.7 minutes), as compared with the control Terumo group (178.2 minutes), without increasing vascular complications.
FarisPDGrantFCGalbraithPDGongYGhaliWA. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization and revasculariza tion rates for coronary heart disease. Can J Cardiol2004; 30: 391–397
2.
DeulingJHVermeulenRPAnthonioRAvan den HeuvelAFJaarsmaTJessurunG. Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: A comparison of angio-seal, StarClose, and manual compression. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2008; 71: 518–523.
3.
Hildick-SmithDJRLoweMDWalshJTLudmanPFStephensNGSchofieldPM. Coronary angiography from the radial artery – experience, complications and limitations. Int J Cardiol1998; 64: 231–239.
4.
WalkerSClearySHigginsM. Comparison of the femostop device and manual pressure in reducing groin puncture site complications following coronary angioplasty, and coronary stent placement. Int J Nurs Pract2001; 7: 366–375.
5.
McAlpine BensonLWunderlyDPerryBKabboordJWenkTBirdsallB. Determining best practice: Comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures. Heart Lung2005; 34: 115.
6.
ChanLLSaboJSavikK. Effects of three groin compression methods on patient discomfort, distress, and vascular complications following a percutaneous coronary intervention procedure. Nurs Res2005; 54: 391.
7.
SmithTTLabriolaR. Developing best practice in arterial sheath removal for registered nurses. J Nurs Care Qual2001; 16: 61–67.
8.
BrasseletCTassanSNazeyrollasPHamonMMetzD. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: Results of the FARMI trial. Heart2007; 93: 1556–1561.
9.
BurzottaFTraniCTodaroDRomagnoliENiccoliGGinnicoF. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiographic evaluation in patients with internal mammary artery grafts. J Cardiovasc Med2008; 9: 263–266.
10.
SaitoSMiyakeSHosokawaGTanakaSKawamitsuKKanedaH. Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv1999; 46: 37–41.
11.
AgostoniPBiondi-ZoccaiGGde BenedictisMLRigattieriSTurriMAnselmiM. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol2004; 44: 349–356.
12.
MoriceMCDumasPLefevreTLoubeyreCLouvardYPiechaudJF. Systematic use of transradial approach or suture of the femoral artery after angioplasty: Attempt at achieving zero access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2000; 51: 417–421.
13.
ChoiEYKoYGKimJBRheeJParkSChoiD. Hemostatic efficacy of hydrophilic wound dressing after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol2005; 17: 459–462.
BalzerJOSchwarzWThalhammerAEichlerKSchmitz-RixenTVoglTJ. Postinterventional percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites using the Clo-Sur PAD device: Initial findings. Eur Radiol2007; 17: 693–700.
16.
MlekuschWDickPHaumerMSabetiSMinarESchillingerM. Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (clo-sur P.A.D.) versus conventional manual compression: A randomized control trial. J Endovasc Ther2006; 13: 23–31.
17.
GhuranAVDixonGHolmbergSde BelderAHildick-SmithD. (2007). Transradial coronary intervention without pre-screening for a dual palmar blood supply. Int Journal of Cardiol, 121(3): 320–322.
