This paper discusses how language games might facilitate a reimagining of learning conversations in art education, by comparing them with Socratic, Kantian and post-structuralist dialogical perspectives that inform group critique. It proposes that language games may facilitate the construction of more personal and layered modes of conversation, instead of prescribing processes intended to seek universal truths, authentic self-knowledge, or disruptive critical scepticism. It argues that they promote the recognition of all co-learners as people who come with their own valuable original ideas and backgrounds.
Bakhtin MM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (Holquist MH ed). Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
BelenkyMFClinchyBMGoldbergerNRet al. (1986) Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, New York: Basic Books.
3.
BishopC (2004) Antagonism and relational aesthetics. October110: 51–79.
4.
BishopC (2006) The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. ArtforumFebruary: 179–185.
5.
BourriaudN (2002) Relational Aesthetics, France: les presses du réel.
6.
CavellS (1966) The availability of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In: PitcherG (ed.) Wittgenstein – The Philosophical Investigations: Modern Studies in Philosophy, a Collection of Critical Essays, London: Macmillan, pp. 151–185.
7.
DaelemansSMaranhãoT (1990) Psychoanalytic dialogue and the dialogical principle. In: MaranhãoT (ed.) The Interpretation of Dialogue, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 219–241.
8.
ElkinsJ (2001) Why Art Cannot Be Taught: A Handbook for Art Students, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
ElkinsJCotterMCurtinTet al. (2006) Why art cannot be taught: A conversation. In: SteinerSJoyceT (eds) Cork Caucus: On art, Possibility & Democracy, Cork: National Sculpture Factory and Revolver, pp. 247–259.
10.
FaubionJDMarcusGE (2008) Constructionism in anthropology. In: HolsteinJAGubriumJF (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 67–84.
11.
FosterH (1996) The Return of the Real: The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
12.
FreireP (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
13.
FutterD (2009) The concept of persuasion in Plato’s early and middle dialogues. South African Journal of Philosophy28(2): 102–113.
14.
GeorgeF (1980) A vendre: Yau de poêle usage. Les temps modernes411: 722–726.
15.
GillickLWeinerL (2005/2006) Between Artists, New York: Art Resources Transfer.
16.
GubriumJFHolsteinJA (2008) Introduction: The constructionist mosaic. In: HolsteinJAGubriumJF (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 3–12.
17.
Hamilton E and Cairns H (eds) (1961) Plato: The Collected Dialogues, Including the Letters. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
18.
HolsteinJAGubriumJF (2008) Constructionist impulses in ethnographic fieldwork. In: HolsteinJAGubriumJF (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 373–398.
19.
JacobsM (2006) The Presenting Past: The Core of Psychodynamic Counselling and Therapy, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
20.
KesterGH (1997) Aesthetics after the end of art: An interview with Susan Buck-Morss. Art Journal, Aesthetics and the Body Politic56(1): 38–45.
21.
KesterGH (2004) Conversation Pieces: Community + Communication in Modern Art, Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
KesterGH (2011) The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context, Durham: Duke University Press.
LeighF (2007) Platonic dialogue, maieutic method and critical thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education41(3): 309–323.
25.
LockeK (2007) Rational control and irrational free-play: Dual-thinking modes as necessary tension in grounded theorizing. In: BryantACharmazK (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 565–579.
26.
LundbergC (2012) Lacan in Public: Psychoanalysis and the Science of Rhetoric, Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
27.
MitchellS (2006) Socratic dialogue, the humanities and the art of the question. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education5(2): 181–197.
SmithJH (1985) Dialogic midwifery in Kleist’s Marquise von O and the hermeneutics of telling the untold in Kant and Plato. PMLA: The Journal of the Modern Language Association of America100(2): 203–219.
30.
SteinbergL (1972) Other Criteria: Confrontations with Twentieth-Century Art, London: Oxford University Press.
31.
StrathernM (1997) Improving ratings: Audit in the British university system. European Review5(3): 305–321.
32.
StrathernM (2000) Afterword: Accountability… and ethnography. In: StrathernM (ed.) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 279–304.
33.
WainwrightL (2010) Foreword. In: JacobMJGrabnerM (eds) The Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. ix–x.
34.
WittgensteinL (1958) The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
35.
WorthamSJacksonK (2008) Educational constructionisms. In: HolsteinJAGubriumJF (eds) Handbook of Constructionist Research, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 107–128.
