In this essay, the author connects research on student learning in writing studies with the theory of signature pedagogies first presented by Shulman in 2005. In particular, the author unpacks how peer critique (also called peer review) develops the habits of mind of the discipline articulated in the “Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing”(Hansen, 2012). By looking through the lens of Shulman’s structural definition of signature pedagogies, the author shows how peer critique develops the “habits of head, hand, and heart” of writing studies (Ciccone, 2009).
Adler-KassnerLDownsE (2015) Naming What We Know—Threshold Concepts in Writing Studies, Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press.
2.
ArmstrongSLPaulsonEJ (2008) Whither ‘peer review?’ Terminology matters for the writing classroom. Teaching English in the Two-Year College35(4): 398–407.
3.
ChickNLHaynieAGurungRAR (2009) From generic to signature pedagogies. In: GurungRARChickNLHaynieA (eds) Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. 1–16.
4.
CicconeT (2009) Foreword. In: GurungRARChickNLHaynieA (eds) Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. xi–xvi.
5.
Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project (2011) “Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing” Council of Writing Program Administrators. Web, 10 February 2015.
6.
DownsDWardleE (2007) Teaching about writing, righting misconceptions: (re)envisioning ‘first-year composition’ as ‘introduction to writing studies.’. College Composition and Communication58(4): 552–584.
HansenK (2012) The framework for success in postsecondary writing: Better than the competition, still not all we need. College English74(6): 520–553.
9.
McCormickK (2006) Do you believe in magic? Collaboration and the demystification of research. In: SullivanPTinbergH (eds) What is “College-Level” Writing?, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 199–230.
10.
ShulmanL (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus134: 52–59.
11.
SommersNSaltzL (2004) The novice as expert: Writing the freshmen year. College Composition and Communication56(1): 124–149.
12.
SullivanP (2003) An essential question: What is “college-level” writing? In: SullivanPTinbergH (eds) What is “College-Level” Writing?, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, pp. 1–24.
