High stakes assessments are commonly used at the end of secondary school to select students for higher education. However, growing concerns about the preparedness of new undergraduates for university study have led to an increased focus on the form of assessments used at upper secondary level. This study compared the structure and format of assessments used at upper secondary level (GCE A level qualifications), and the first year of undergraduate study of English literature in England. Greater diversity of assessment was found at university compared to A level, while there was little difference in the level of scaffolding and guidance provided in assessment materials. We conclude that it seems inevitable that some students will meet forms of assessment with which they are unfamiliar at university. Implications for the design of first-year undergraduate courses are discussed.
BassettDCawstonTThravesL (2009) A New Level, London: Reform.
2.
CrispV (2008) Improving students' capacity to show their knowledge, understanding and skills in exams by using combined question and answer papers. Research Papers in Education23(1): 69–84.
3.
EllisD (2008) In at the Deep End? The First Year of Undergraduate English, London: Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for English.
4.
First Year Shock Absorber Project (2010) The first year shock absorber project. Final Report, Higher Education Academy National Teaching Fellowship Scheme, November.
GreenA (2005) Four Perspectives on Transition: English Literature from Sixth Form to University. Report Series, London: Higher Education Academy English Subject Centre.
7.
GreenA (2006) Transition and Acculturation. Changing Expectations in the Move Between A level and University, Middlesex: School of Sport and Education, Brunel University.
8.
IannonePSimpsonA (2012) A survey of current assessment practices. In: IannonePSimpsonA (eds) Mapping University Mathematics Assessment Practices, Norwich: UEA, pp. 3–16. .
9.
Jansen EWA and Meer J (2012) Ready for university? A cross-national study of students’ perceived preparedness for university. The Australian Educational Researcher, 39(1): 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s13384-011-0044-6.
MehtaSSutoIBrownS (2012) How effective are curricula for 16 to 19 year olds as a preparation for university? An investigation of lecturers’ views. In: European conference of educational research, 17–21 September. Cadiz, Spain. .
PriceM (2013) Assessment literacy: Making the link between satisfaction and learning. In: 4th assessment in higher education, 26–27 June. Birmingham, UK. .
SmithKHopkinsC (2005) Great expectations. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education4(3): 304–318.
20.
StruyvenKDochyFJanssensS (2005) Students' perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education30(4): 325–341.
21.
SutoI (2012) How well prepared are new undergraduates for university study? An investigation of lecturers’ perceptions and experiences. In: Society for research into higher education, 12–14 December. Newport, Wales. .
22.
Taber KS (2003) Examining structure and context – questioning the nature and purpose of summative assessment. In: Paper presented at the Cambridge International Examinations, Conference, July. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate.
23.
TorenbeekMJansenEHofmanA (2010) The effect of the fit between secondary and university education on first-year student achievement. Studies in Higher Education35(6): 659–675.
WingateU (2006) Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education11(4): 457–469.
26.
WintersonJRussM (2009) Understanding the transition from school to university in music and music technology. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education8(3): 339–354.
