This article considers the way we talk about learning and teaching the humanities in higher education in the UK. By using the tools of the arts and humanities within the scholarship of learning and teaching, and examining a personal perspective, the author explores the transformational impact of French language learning and teaching. Close textual analysis of literary language learning memoirs highlight the sensual and physical effects of language learning that can remain muted in our everyday conversations. As a result, the author suggests that rather than lament the death of the humanities in 21st century higher education, learning and teaching a language offers a pedagogy of desire that embodies the transformation aspect of our disciplines, as we deal with the business of being human.
Barnett R (2014) Imagining the humanities – amid the inhuman. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, special issue 13(1–2): 43–54.
2.
BassRLinkonSL (2008) On the evidence of theory: Close reading as a disciplinary model for writing about teaching and learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7(3): 245–261.
3.
BovillCCook-SatherAFeltenP (2011) Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development16(2): 133–145.
4.
ChickNHasselHHaynieA (2009) ‘Pressing an ear against the hive’: Reading literature for complexity. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture9(3): 399–422.
5.
ColemanJ (2014) French Studies in the United Kingdom: How did we get here and where are we going?French Studies Bulletin35(130): 1–6.
6.
ColliniS (2012) What are Universities for?, London: Penguin.
7.
EpsteinM (2012) Transformative Humanities: A manifesto, New York: Bloomsbury.
8.
GunnV (2014) Present teaching stories as re-membering the humanities. Humanities3: 264–282.
9.
HargreavesNForsdickCMurphyD (2010) Transnational French Studies: Postcolonialism and Littérature-Monde, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
10.
HoffmanE (1998) Lost in Translation – A life in a New Language, London: Vintage.
11.
HustonN (1999) Perdre le Nord Suivi de Douze France, Arles: Actes Sud.
12.
IngoldT (2011) Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London: Routledge.
13.
JonesA (1996) Desire, sexual harassment, and pedagogy in the university classroom. Theory into Practice35(2): 102–109.
14.
KaplanA (1993) French Lessons – A memoir, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
15.
Kelan E (2011) Moving bodies and minds – the quest for embodiment in teaching and learning. Higher Education Research Network Journal 3: 39–46.
16.
KramschC (2009) The Multilingual Subject, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
LoadsD (2013) Collaborative close reading of teaching texts: One way of helping academics to make sense of their practice. Teaching in Higher Education18(8): 950–957.
18.
MeyerJLandR (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education49(3): 373–388.
19.
PhippsA (2007) The sound of higher education: Sensuous epistemologies and the mess of knowing. London Review of Education5(1): 1–13.
20.
Phipps A and Gonzalez M (2004) Modern languages: Learning and teaching in an intercultural field. London: Sage.
21.
SchonD (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
ShulmanL (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus134(3): 52–59.
23.
SwordH (2009) Writing higher education differently: A manifesto in style. Studies in Higher Education34(3): 319–336.
24.
TrethewayA (2004) Sexuality, eros, and pedagogy: Desiring laughter in the classroom. Women in Language27(1): 34–39.
25.
Trowler P (2013) Can approaches to research in Art and Design be beneficially adapted for research into higher education? Higher Education Research & Development 32 (1): 56–69.
