The severity of the global economic crisis has put the spotlight firmly on measuring academic and research performance and productivity and assessing its contribution, value, impact and benefit. While, traditionally, research output and impact were measured by peer-publications and citations, there is increased emphasis on a ‘market-driven approach’, which favours the bio-, medical and technological sciences, and has helped reinforce a disciplinary hierarchy in which arts and humanities research has struggled for attention. This article charts the changing policy environment across Ireland, the Netherlands and Norway. It draws on evidence from the HERAVALUE project that studied how different stakeholders value arts and humanities research; almost 100 interviews were conducted with representatives from the academy, policymakers and civil society in these three countries. Although the arts and culture have played a distinctive nation-forming role, and continue to do so, each country has adopted very different policy responses towards arts and humanities research.
BakhshiHSchneiderPWalkerC (2008) Arts and Humanities Research and Innovation, Bristol: AHRC.
4.
Bangemann M, Fonseca E, Davis P, et al. (1994) Bangemann Report Recommendations to the European Council. Europe. The Global Information Society. Brussels: European Commission, pp.1–40.
5.
BeckerGS (1964, 1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BelfioreEBennettO (2007) Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy13(2): 135–151.
7.
Benneworth P (2012) Thirty years of crisis? The disputed public value humanities research in the Netherlands 1982-2012. Unpublished Netherlands National Report, HERAVALUE. Twente: University of Twente.
8.
BiggsM (2007) Modelling experiential knowledge for research. In: MäkeläMRoutarinneS (eds) The Art of Research: Research Practices in Art and Design, Helsinki: University of Art and Design, pp. 180–204.
9.
Bod R (2012) How the humanities changed the world. In: HERAVALUE symposium and evidence session, Amsterdam, 30 May.
BricMJ (1999) The humanities and the social sciences: a case for a research council. A report to the Minister for education and science, Dublin: Higher Education Authority.
CastellsM (1994) The University system: Engine of development in the New World Economy. In: SalmiJVespoorAM (eds) Revitalizing Higher Education, Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 14–40.
15.
CastellsM (1996) Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
16.
CoopersLybrand (1994) The employment and economic significance of the cultural industries in Ireland, Dublin: Corporate Finance Service.
GriffinG (2006) Balancing Agendas: Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education5(3): 219–241.
27.
Gulbrandsen M and Aanstad S (2013) Arts and humanities research in Norway – perspectives on value, relevance and utility. Unpublished Norway National Report, HERAVALUE. Oslo: University of Oslo.
28.
GulbrandsenMNerdrumL (2009) Public R&D and industrial innovation in Norway: A historical perspective. In: FagerbergJMoweryDCVerspagenB (eds) Innovation, Path-Dependency and Policy: The Norwegian Case, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–88.
29.
HarpurJ (2010) Innovation, Profit and the Common Good in Higher Education, The New Alchemy, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
30.
HazelkornE (2001) The dynamics of cultural production in Ireland: Economic strategy, digital technology and public policy making. In: ErnstKHalbertsmaMJanssenS (eds) Trends and Strategies in the Arts and Cultural Industries, Rotterdam: Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn & Co.’s.
31.
HazelkornE (2011) Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World Class Excellence, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
HEA (2010) Playing to Our Strengths. The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences and Implications for Public Policy. Dublin: Higher Education Authority. Available at: http://goo.gl/4G7j6m (accessed 26 April 2014).
37.
HicksD (2009) Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation. Higher Education57(4): 393–404.
IRCHSS (2010) Mosaic: A Celebration of Irish Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Dublin: Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences.
NussbaumM (2010) Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
O’Donnell R (2011) Making the case for the role of arts, humanities and social sciences. In: Presentation to the HERAVALUE seminar, Dublin.
46.
O’Riain S (2004) State, competition and industrial change in Ireland 1991-1999. The Economic and Social Review35(1): 27–53.
47.
Royal Irish Academy (2009) Developing Performance Indicators for the Humanities. A report of a meeting convened by the Royal Irish Academy and the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Dublin: RIA.
SantiagoPTremblayKBasriE (2008) Tertiary Education for the Knowledge SocietyVol. 2Paris: OECD.
51.
SaundersMTrowlerPBamberV (2011) Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education. The Practice Turn, Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
52.
SlaughterSLeslieL (1997) Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
Velzing EJ (2013) Innovatiepolitiek – een reconstructie van het innovatiebeleid van het ministerie van Economische Zaken van 1976 tot en met 2010. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
