Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What does it mean to find echoes of an innovatory moment in the past, or a discipline’s cutting edge in another’s worn down tool, or people in different fields quite unknown to one another following a similar intellectual trajectory over the same three or four years? A short case study of what looks uncannily like ‘independent invention’ is prefaced by reflections on replicatory practice in the social sciences. Some US sociological theorizing on the workings of fractal distinctions within disciplines, specifically across many foundational arguments in social science, finds a counterpart in UK anthropological theorizing on scale and replication in social phenomena at large. The conjunction is amusing; it could well be instructive. In any event, there is a challenge here to comparisons across disciplines.

Keywords

disciplinary distinctions fractals relations repetition social knowledge practices social science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(2001) The Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Amsterdamska

(2008) Practices, peoples, and places. In: Hackett

Amsterdamska

Lynch

Macjman

(eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–209.

Barry

Born

Weszkalnys

(2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37: 20–49.

Beer

(1996) Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Born

(1998) Anthropology, Kleinian psychoanalysis, and the subject in culture. American Anthropologist 100: 373–386.

Camic

Gross

Lamont

(2011) Introduction to Camic C. In: Gross

Lamont

(eds) Social Knowledge in the Making, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–40.

Du Gay P (2006) Re-instating an ethic of office? Office, ethos and persona in public management. Working Paper no. 13, ESRC Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.

Du Gay

(2008) Max Weber and the moral economy of office. Journal of Cultural Economy 1(2): 129–144.

Galison

(1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

10.

Green

(2005) Notes from the Balkans: Locating Marginality and Ambiguity on the Greek-Albanian Border, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

11.

Irvine

Gal

(2000) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In: Kroskrity

(eds) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–83.

12.

Jasanoff

(2004) The idiom of co-production, and Ordering society, ordering knowledge. In: Jasanoff

(eds) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, Abingdon: Routledge.

13.

Lederman

(2005) Unchosen grounds: Cultivating cross-subfield accents for a public voice. In: Segal

Yanagisako

(eds) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 49–77.

14.

Lemov

(2011) Filing the total human: Anthropological archives from 1928 to 1963. In: Camic

Gross

Lamont

(eds) Social Knowledge in the Making, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–150.

15.

Osborne

(2002) History, theory, disciplinarity. In: Joyce

(eds) The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences, London: Routledge.

16.

Segal

Yanagisako

(2005) Unwrapping the Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

17.

Strathern

(1995) The relation: Issues in complexity and scale. Prickly Pear Pamphlet no. 6 , Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.

18.

Strathern

(2004 [1991]) Partial Connections, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

19.

Strathern

(2008/9) The disappearing of an office. Cambridge Anthropology 28(3): 127–138.

20.

Strathern

(2011) Binary license. Common Knowledge 17(1): 87–103.

21.

Wagner

(1991) The fractal person. In: Godelier

Strathern

(eds) Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–173.

22.

Yanagisako

(2005) Flexible disciplinarity: Beyond the Americanist tradition. In: Segal

Yanagisako

(eds) Unwrapping The Sacred Bundle: Reflections on the Disciplining of Anthropology, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 78–98.

Innovation or replication? Crossing and criss-crossing in social science

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References