Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The most successful historical arguments are expressed in a voice unmistakeably the author’s own, yet this numbers among the most difficult skills to accomplish. In this article, I discuss a series of seminars which I ran in University College London’s History Department in order to help undergraduate historians develop their authorial voice. Some of these seminars were held under the aegis of University College London’s Writing and Learning Mentor Programme; others were held as a series of classes taken by all first-year undergraduate historians. The aim was to encourage students to think carefully about how historical research can be articulated, and about the links between different types of history and different types of argument. In order to define historical argument, we studied the characteristics of several different but very established historians, and used this as a springboard to focus on the authorial voices of the students themselves.

Keywords

argument historiography history mentors Writing in the Disciplines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adkins, R. ( 2004) Nelson’s Trafalgar: The Battle that Changed the World. London: Penguin.

Arrian (1976) Anabasis, trans. P.A. Brunt. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

Bosworth, A.B. ( 1988) From Arrian to Alexander. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carlyle, T. ( 2002 [1837]) The French Revolution: A History. New York: The Modern Library.

Elbow, P. ( 1998) Writing Without Teachers: 25th Anniversary Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Figes, O. ( 2006) ‘Afterword’, in Tolstoy, L. (ed.) War and Peace. London : Penguin.

Furet, F. ( 1981) Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbon, E. ( 2000 [1776-1788]) The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, abr. and ed. Womersley D. London: Penguin.

Greenwood, E. ( 2006) Thucydides and the Shaping of History. London: Duckworth.

10.

Griffiths, A. ( 2006) ‘Stories and storytelling in the Histories’ , in Dewald, C. and Maricola, J. (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus , pp. 130-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Hall, C. ( 2002) Civilising Subjects. Cambridge: Polity Press.

12.

Hornblower, S. ( 1987) Thucydides. London: Duckworth.

13.

Khaldûn, I. ( 2004) The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. abridged edition, trans. Rosenthal, F. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

LaCapra, D. ( 2002) ‘Writing history, writing trauma’, in Monroe, J. (ed.) Writing and Revising the Disciplines, pp. 147-80. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

15.

Momigliano, A. ( 1954) ‘A hundred years after Ranke’, Diogenes 2: 52-8.

16.

Momigliano, A. ( 1975) Alien Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Momigliano, A. ( 1990) The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.

18.

Monroe, J. ( 2002) ‘Introduction: the shapes of fields’, in Monroe, J. (ed.) Writing and Revising the Disciplines. pp. 1-14. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

19.

Rosenberg, J.D. ( 1985) Carlyle and the Burden of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Seigel, J.P. ( 1971) Thomas Carlyle: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge.

21.

Tosh, J. ( 2006) The Pursuit of History. 4th edn, with S. Lang. Edinburgh : Pearson Education.

Students rewriting Gibbon,and other stories

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References