Educators and researchers are increasingly calling for the processes of writing and knowledge construction to be an integral part of disciplinary learning. This article contributes to the literature by presenting an empirical analysis of a programme that was designed to expose students to the complexities of academic practices in conjunction with disciplinary concepts. The impact of the programme was evaluated through analysis of student grades before and after its implementation and student and tutor perception of its effect. Data collected included surveys, interviews and focus groups. The data showed that the programme generated student engagement with the processes of knowledge construction and reflected better thinking in the subject. This was evidenced by effective utilisation of feedback and improved grades in written assignments. The findings suggest that similar programmes are of value potentially to any discipline.
AndersonCHounsellD (2007) Knowledge practices: ‘Doing the subject’ in undergraduate courses. Curriculum Journal18(4): 463–78.
2.
BurnsRB (1997) Introduction to Research Methods, 3rd edn.Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Longman Australia.
3.
CarlessD (2006) Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 219–33.
4.
GayLRMillsGEAirasianP (2006) Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 8th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
5.
GeeJ (1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologues in Discourses, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palmer Press.
6.
GreenlawS (2003) Using writing to enhance student learning in undergraduate economics. International Review of Economics Education1(1): 61–70.
7.
HaggisT (2006) Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education31(5): 521–35.
8.
HansenWL (1998) Integrating the practice of writing into economics education instruction. In: BeckerWEWattsM (eds) Teaching Economics to Undergraduates: Alternatives to Chalk and Talk. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 79–118.
9.
HigginsRHartleyPSkeltonA (2002) The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education27(1): 53–64.
10.
HounsellDMcCuneVHounsellJ. (2008) The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development27(1): 55–67.
11.
HunterK (2006) Embedding academic literacy development into the curriculum: A University of Technology, Sydney, case study. In: GriggGBondC (eds) Supporting Learning in the 21st Century: Refereed Proceedings of the 2005 ATLAANZ Conference. Auckland: ATLAANZ, pp. 115–128.
12.
HunterKDochertyP (2011) Reducing variation in the assessment of student writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education36(1): 109–24.
13.
JacobsC (2005) On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education10(4): 475–487.
14.
KnoblaunchCHBrannonL (1983) Writing as learning through the curriculum. College English45(5): 465–74.
15.
LeaMStreetB (1998) Student writing in higher education: And academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education23(2): 157–72.
16.
MitchellSEvisonA (2006) Exploiting the potential of writing for educational change at Queen Mary, University of London. In: Ganobcsik-WilliamsL (ed.) Teaching Academic Writing in Higher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 68–84.
17.
MonroeJ (2003) Writing and the disciplines. Peer Review6: 4–7.
18.
MorleyJ (2008) Writing support in British higher education: An institutional case study. In: FriedrichP (ed.) Teaching Academic Writing. London: Continuum, pp. 125–46.
19.
MurrayR (2006) If not rhetoric and composition, then what? Teaching teachers to teach writing. In: Ganobcsik-WilliamsL (ed.) Teaching Academic Writing in Higher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 124–33.
20.
NorthedgeA (2003a) Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education8(2): 169–80.
21.
NorthedgeA (2003b) Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education8(1): 17–32.
22.
O’DonovanBPriceMRustC (2004) Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education9(3): 325–35.
23.
SimJS (1998) Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing28(2): 345–52.
24.
ThiesLC (2012) Increasing student participation and success: Collaborating to embed academic literacies into the curriculum. Journal of Academic Language and Learning6(1): A15–31.
25.
WingateU (2006) Doing away with study skills. Teaching in Higher Education11(4): 457–69.
26.
WingateUAndonNCogoA (2011) Embedding academic writing instruction into subject teaching: A case study. Active Learning in Higher Education12(1): 69–81.
27.
WingateUTribbleC (2012) The best of both worlds? Towards an English for academic purposes/academic literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education37(4): 481–95.
